Dismissals on capability grounds
In this guide:
- Dismissing employees
- Types of employee dismissal
- Fair dismissal
- Unfair dismissal
- Unfair dismissal: employee eligibility
- Dismissals on capability grounds
- Dismissals relating to industrial action
- Dismissal due to illness
- Dismissals on conduct grounds
- Whistleblowing and dismissal
- Whistleblowing: Qualifying disclosures
- Whistleblowing: Exceptionally serious failures
- Whistleblowing: Right of complaint to an industrial tribunal
Types of employee dismissal
The different types of staff dismissal and unfair dismissal claims.
There are several types of staff dismissal:
- fair dismissal
- unfair dismissal
- constructive dismissal
- wrongful dismissal
Fair and unfair dismissal
A dismissal is fair or unfair depending on your reason or reasons for dismissal and whether you act reasonably during the dismissal process. Industrial tribunals/arbitrators follow previous legal decisions in deciding what is reasonable. What is unfair dismissal and what is fair dismissal?
Constructive dismissal
Constructive dismissal occurs where an employee resigns because you have substantially breached their employment contract, for example:
- cutting wages without agreement
- unlawfully demoting them
- allowing colleagues to subject them to harassment, bullying, victimisation, humiliation or discrimination
- unfairly increasing their workload
- changing the location of their workplace without contractual authority
- making them work in dangerous conditions
The breach of contract can result from either a single serious event or the last in a series of less serious events.
An individual may claim constructive unfair dismissal. A constructive dismissal is not necessarily an unfair one but it's hard for an employer to show that an action in breach of the contract was, in fact, fair.
Wrongful dismissal
Wrongful dismissal is where a contractual term is broken in the dismissal process, for example, dismissing an employee without giving them proper notice.
For further information see the Employers' Handbook Section 18: Disciplinary issues and dismissal (PDF, 95K).
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/types-employee-dismissal
Links
Fair dismissal
You must have a valid reason for dismissing an employee - understand the reasons that constitute a fair dismissal.
To dismiss an employee fairly, you must first have a fair reason for doing so. Potential reasons for fair dismissal include:
- conduct
- capability
- redundancy
- a statutory requirement which could prevent the employment continuing, such as a driver losing their driving licence
- some other substantial reason - any other potentially fair reasons fall into this category
An example of 'some other substantial reason' would be the dismissal of an employee who was taken on as a temporary replacement for an employee on maternity leave. For such a dismissal to be fair, you must have told the replacement employee at the beginning of their employment that the job was only temporary.
In order for any dismissal to be fair, you must also act reasonably and fairly during the dismissal procedure.
Acting reasonably
There is no statutory definition of 'reasonableness'. Reasonableness will be judged taking into account the employer's size and resources and will also consider whether the employer:
- raised and dealt with the issue promptly and consistently throughout the process
- genuinely believed that the reason for dismissal was a potentially fair one
- had reasonable grounds for that belief
- carried out proper and reasonable investigations where appropriate
- followed statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures
- informed the employee in writing why they were being considered for dismissal and listened to their views
- allowed the employee to be accompanied at disciplinary/dismissal hearings and appeals
- gave the employee the chance to appeal against the decision to dismiss
Reasonableness may also depend on whether the employee could be expected to understand the consequences of their behaviour.
Dismissal and disciplinary procedures
You must set out your dismissal and disciplinary rules and procedures in writing. Sample dismissal procedures (DOC, 14K).
There is a minimum statutory procedure that must be followed when you decide to dismiss an employee. Failure to follow this procedure may result in a finding of automatic unfair dismissal.
If you fail to follow the statutory procedure, where it applies, and the issue is subsequently heard by a tribunal, any compensation awarded to the employee could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
You should follow the good practice advice set out in the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance.
Additional advice, including sample procedures, can be found in the LRA guidance on advice on handling discipline and grievances at work.
Though tribunals/arbitrators do not have to take this booklet into account, it provides more detail and guidance which may be helpful.
Summary dismissals
Summary dismissal is the dismissal of an employee without notice or pay in lieu of notice - this occurs when they have committed an act of gross misconduct.
You should investigate the circumstances of the misconduct before dismissing the employee.
However, if you feel that you have no choice but to dismiss an employee, you must still follow statutory procedures.
Staff probationary periods
If you decide to dismiss an employee during their probationary period, you must follow at least the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure.
Third-party pressure to dismiss an employee
If a customer or client threatens to withdraw their business unless you dismiss one of your employees, only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can determine whether or not such a dismissal is fair. Such dismissals are normally categorised as 'some other substantial reason'.
You cannot however take into account pressure exerted by a trade union by the calling or threatening of industrial action.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/fair-dismissal
Links
Unfair dismissal
Reasons that automatically constitute the unfair dismissal of an employee.
Even if you think you have dismissed an employee fairly, they could decide to bring an unfair dismissal claim because they believe that:
- the reason you gave for the dismissal wasn't the real one
- you dismissed them for an unfair reason - see unfair dismissal
- you acted unreasonably, eg by failing to give the employee plenty of warning in the run-up to taking the decision to dismiss them
How to fairly dismiss an employee fairly
If you think you may have to dismiss an employee, make sure that you:
- Have a fair reason for dismissal.
- Follow - at the very least - the statutory dismissal procedure. If you unreasonably fail to follow the statutory dismissal procedure and the issue is heard at tribunal, any compensation awarded to the employee could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
- Follow any contractual disciplinary/dismissal procedure you may have, as well as the guidance outlined in the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance Procedures. Your contractual procedure should comply with the code.
See fair dismissal.
Penalties for unfair dismissals
If an employee has been unfairly dismissed, the employer may be ordered to reinstate or reengage the employee. This however is an exceptional outcome.
Invariably, a tribunal or arbitrator will award compensation, made up of a basic award that depends on the employee's age, gross weekly pay, length of service, and a compensatory award.
They can also make an additional award if you fail to follow an order to reinstate or re-engage the employee.
Apart from in health and safety and whistleblowing cases, there is a limit on the amount which can be awarded for unfair dismissal. For the latest limits on awards, see our table of current tribunal and arbitration compensation limits.
The Labour Relations Agency Arbitration Scheme
The Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Arbitration Scheme provides an alternative to having a case heard by a tribunal to resolve an employment-related dispute (for example, claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract or discrimination, etc).
The scheme is quicker, confidential, non-legalistic, less formal, and more cost-effective than a tribunal hearing.
Under the scheme, an arbitrator's decision is binding as a matter of law and has the same effect as a tribunal.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/unfair-dismissal
Links
Unfair dismissal: employee eligibility
Employer consequences if you dismiss someone unfairly.
Employees can usually only claim unfair dismissal if they have worked for you for at least one year.
There are a number of reasons for dismissal that are automatically unfair. Most of these do not require the employee to have a minimum of one year's service, ie the employee will be able to claim unfair dismissal from day one of employment.
Who cannot complain to a tribunal about unfair dismissal?
The right to complain to a tribunal about unfair dismissal is also not available to:
- Self-employed people.
- Those who are not employees, eg casual workers, independent contractors or freelance agents.
- Members of the armed forces.
- Employees who have reached a settlement with their employer via Labour Relations Agency (LRA) conciliation.
- Individuals working under an illegal contract, eg a barman who is under the age of 18 years old or employees in receipt of untaxed monies.
- Employees covered by a dismissal procedure agreement that has been exempted from the unfair dismissal provisions by legislation. This is a rarely exercised legal provision.
- Employees taking part in unofficial industrial action (unless the dismissal is for certain specified reasons, eg taking family leave or making a protected disclosure). For more information, see the page in this guide on dismissals relating to industrial action.
- The police (although police staff may make unfair dismissal claims where the dismissal relates to health and safety or the making of a protected disclosure).
- Those employed as a master - or as a member of the crew - of a fishing vessel where the individual is paid only by a share in the profits or gross earnings of the vessel.
- Employees who have reached a settlement with their employer via a 'compromise agreement'. This is an agreement reached, with the benefit of a relevant independent advisor who has professional indemnity insurance, in which the employee waives their right to make a complaint in relation to the dispute to which the settlement relates. This means that the agreement must specify the legal basis for the dispute - it cannot state that it covers all the possible employment-related claims.
Exemption from the unfair dismissal provisions
The parties to a dismissal-procedures agreement can apply jointly to the Department for the Economy to substitute provisions of the unfair dismissal legislation. Such substitution may be allowed if all the following points are satisfied:
- every trade union which is a party to the agreement is independent
- the agreement has a procedure to be followed if an employee claims to have been unfairly dismissed
- the procedure is non-discriminatory and available to all relevant employees
- the procedure gives employees a similar level of protection to that provided by the legislation
- the agreement includes provision either for arbitration in every case or allows arbitration in cases where a decision can't be reached or where a decision raises a question of law
- the agreement clearly defines which employees it applies to
Lay-offs and short-time working
You may temporarily lay off an employee or put them on short-time working, eg because of a downturn in work. This does not necessarily amount to a redundancy dismissal. You can only do this if the terms of their contract of employment allow it or by agreement with the employee. See Employers' Handbook Section 23: Lay-off and short time working (PDF, 33K).
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/unfair-dismissal-employee-eligibility
Links
Dismissals on capability grounds
How to dismiss an employee fairly when they are incapable of doing their job properly or commit some form of misconduct.
Sometimes an employee is incapable of doing their job to the required standard. This may be because they don't have the right skills or aptitude for the job.
They may also be capable of doing their job, but unwilling or reluctant to do it properly. In these particular circumstances, you would deal with the issue as one of misconduct and follow your company disciplinary procedures and the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures (if they apply). Otherwise capability is a separate dismissal category to misconduct. See dismissals on conduct grounds.
In most cases involving capability, you can help an employee improve by taking informal action, eg by offering training/mentoring or another suitable job (you would only redeploy to another suitable job if this is something that they agree to at this stage).
Capability dismissals: lack of skills/aptitude
To ensure that any resulting capability dismissal is fair when formal action is taken - you should:
- Inform the employee in writing of the performance issues that exist and invite them to a meeting to discuss these issues.
- Following the meeting, give an employee who is found to be performing unsatisfactorily a written note, as a summary and explanation ideally, setting out the performance problems identified at the meeting, the improvement that is required, a reasonable timescale for achieving this improvement, a review date and any identified measures of support you will provide to assist them to meet the required standards.
- Inform your employee that the note represents the first stage of a formal procedure and that failure to improve could lead to a final written warning and, ultimately, dismissal. You should keep a copy of the note and use it as the basis for monitoring and reviewing performance over the specified timescale - see managing staff performance. You should also inform the employee that they may appeal at any stage of the formal process.
- If there is a failure to improve in the timescale outlined, repeat the above procedure and issue a final written warning.
- If again there is a failure to improve within the timescale set out in the final written warning, this may result in dismissal.
- Finally, you should note that some exceptional acts of incapability can merit summary dismissal.
- Throughout the formal process, employees have the right to be accompanied to all meetings and appeal meetings and to appeal to a more senior manager - ideally one not involved in the initial meetings. To read more on the right to be accompanied, read the LRA Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-capability-grounds
Links
Dismissal due to illness
How to handle dismissing an employee due to long-term ill health.
Dismissal due to capability may also include instances where the employer dismisses because the employee is no longer capable of doing the job they were employed to do because of illness.
Occasionally an employee may have to leave your employment because of long-term ill health. Sometimes the employee will simply choose to resign. However, you might eventually have to consider dismissing them.
In order for a dismissal to be potentially fair, you must ensure that you regularly communicate and consult with the employee, take appropriate medical advice, consider the effects of the absence on the business, consider alternatives to dismissal and, if appropriate, take account of any reasonable adjustments as required under disability discrimination legislation. See employ and support people with disabilities.
Finally, before dismissing an employee you must also ensure you comply with the statutory dismissal procedures.
Prior to dismissal due to illness
Before dismissing an employee, you should consider as many ways as possible to help them back to work - dismissal is a last resort and could be unfair if not handled properly. It is also very important that you determine whether or not they are disabled under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
You can consider getting a medical report from their GP (with their written permission), or an occupational health assessment. Remember to ask the questions that are relevant to the job, as this will enable you to get the information you need to make an informed decision. The employee has the right to see the GP report before you and may choose not to disclose some information.
If their continued employment is no longer feasible because there are no reasonable adjustments that can be made, it may be fair for you to dismiss them.
During any dismissal procedure, you should treat all employees with sensitivity. You should also act fairly and reasonably. Your dismissal procedure must follow the statutory dismissal requirements.
If you unreasonably fail to follow the statutory dismissal procedures when dismissing and the employee is successful in unfair dismissal proceedings, any compensation awarded by the tribunal or arbitrator could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
If the employee who is subject to the procedure is disabled, you will also have to consider making any possible reasonable adjustments to allow for their needs; you have to address disability discrimination laws, so this is important.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissal-due-illness
Links
Dismissals relating to industrial action
How to ensure that you dismiss an employee fairly for reasons relating to industrial action.
It is automatically unfair to dismiss workers for taking part in official industrial action:
- In the 12-week period from the day the industrial action starts.
- That lasts longer than 12 weeks - but only if you haven't taken reasonable steps to resolve the dispute. Only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can decide whether or not you've taken the necessary steps to resolve the dispute.
Subject to some exceptions (see below), an employee dismissed while taking part in unofficial industrial action can't generally claim unfair dismissal.
For the difference between official and unofficial industrial action, see our guide on industrial disputes.
If you 'lock-out' employees taking industrial action, the days of the lock-out are not included in the calculation of the 12-week protected period. A lock-out is where you prevent employees from getting to their workplace, eg by locking the doors to the premises.
Apart from this - subject to some exceptions (see below) - an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can't hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while taking part in official industrial action as long as you have:
- dismissed all those who were taking part in the action on the same date that you dismissed the person complaining of unfair dismissal
- not offered re-engagement to any dismissed employee within three months of the dismissal date without making the person complaining of unfair dismissal a similar offer
Exceptions
The exceptions are that a tribunal/arbitrator can hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while taking part in industrial action - either official or unofficial - if the main reason:
- was that the employee took certain specified types of action on health and safety grounds
- related to maternity/paternity/adoption/parental/shared parental/parental bereavement leave, pregnancy or time off for a dependant
- was that the employee exercised their rights under the Working Time Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016
- related to the right to request flexible working arrangements
- was that the employee had been summoned or took time off work for jury service
- was that the employee took certain specified types of action as an employee representative or as a candidate to become one, or taking part in the election of such a representative
An industrial tribunal/arbitrator can also hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while participating in unofficial industrial action if the reason or main reason for the dismissal was that the employee made a protected disclosure.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-relating-industrial-action
Links
Dismissals on conduct grounds
How to dismiss employees involved in incidents of misconduct.
If you find that an employee has been involved in an incident of misconduct, the action you take depends on how serious it is. For example:
- If the misconduct relates to a minor issue, the penalty for a first offence would normally be a verbal warning. This would be followed by a written warning if the offence is repeated within a specified timescale. Further occurrences would result in a final written warning and ultimately dismissal if repeated again.
- If the misconduct relates to a more serious issue, the employer may issue a final written warning for a first offence followed by dismissal for any further repeat of the offence within a specified time scale.
- The Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice applies the statutory procedures to the issue of warnings as a matter of good practice.
- If the misconduct is of a very serious nature, the employer may dismiss for a first offence.
- No disciplinary action should be taken until there has been a thorough investigation into the alleged misconduct.
- Details of the alleged misconduct should be set out in writing and given to the employee prior to any hearing taking place.
- The employee must be offered the right to appeal against any decision taken within the formal procedure
- Throughout the formal process, employees have the right to be accompanied to all meetings and appeal meetings and to appeal to a more senior manager - ideally one not involved in the initial meetings
- The LRA Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures recommends that verbal warnings remain on file for a six-month period and written warnings for a 12-month period.
Discipline and dismissal have a statutory procedure which must be followed and if it is not, where it applies, this may result in a finding of automatic unfair dismissal.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-conduct-grounds
Links
Whistleblowing and dismissal
Protection from dismissal or detrimental treatment for workers who disclose a suspected relevant failure at work.
Workers who suspect wrongdoing and 'blow the whistle' to disclose these concerns to their employer are protected from dismissal or other negative consequences - as long as certain criteria are met. This law intends to help businesses quickly identify and resolve such problems.
The term 'workers' refers to those who work under:
- a contract of employment, eg employees
- some other contract to perform work personally, eg casual workers
It does not cover the genuinely self-employed.
The whistleblowing law also covers NHS practitioners, such as:
- GPs
- certain dentists
- pharmacists
- opticians
It also covers:
- agency workers
- certain categories of trainee
- those who contract to provide services to the Department of Health
- those who contract to provide services to a business via their own limited company - even if introduced via an employment agency or employment business
- student nurses and student midwives who undertake work experience as part of a course of education or training approved by, or under arrangements with, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC)
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-and-dismissal
Links
Whistleblowing: Qualifying disclosures
The types of disclosure that are eligible for protection from dismissal.
The types of disclosure that are eligible for protection are known as 'qualifying disclosures'.
These are where the worker reasonably believes that the disclosure is being made in the public interest and at least one 'relevant failure' is currently happening, took place in the past, or is likely to happen in the future.
Relevant failures can be:
- a criminal offence
- a miscarriage of justice
- damage to the environment
- the breach of a legal obligation
- a danger to the health or safety of any individual
- the deliberate covering up of information tending to show any of these matters
The same protection applies even if the qualifying disclosure concerns a relevant failure overseas or where the applicable law is not that of the UK.
Disclosures that can be characterised as being of a personal rather than public interest, will not be protected.
The belief does not need to be correct. The worker only needs to show that they held the belief and that it was a reasonable belief in the circumstances at the time they made the disclosure.
The disclosure is not a qualifying disclosure if:
- by making the disclosure, the worker has committed an offence, eg under the Official Secrets Act 1989
- the information should be protected from disclosure because of legal professional privilege, eg the disclosure has been made by a legal adviser (or their secretary) who has acquired the information in the course of providing legal advice
Qualifying disclosures made internally
A worker is protected if they make a qualifying disclosure to either:
- their employer - either directly or by using a procedure authorised by the employer for that purpose
- to another person who the worker reasonably believes to be solely or mainly responsible for the relevant failure
Ideally, you should have a whistleblowing policy that includes a procedure to follow if a worker wishes to make a qualifying disclosure.
Qualifying disclosures made externally
A worker is protected if they make a qualifying disclosure to an appropriate 'prescribed person'. These are certain statutory bodies - or people within them - who have the authority to receive disclosures relevant to the role of that particular body. Breaches in health and safety law, for example, can be brought to the attention of the Health and Safety Executive for Northern Ireland or the appropriate local council.
Public Interest Disclosure guidance.
For the disclosure to be protected, the worker must:
- reasonably believe the information and any allegation it contains are substantially true and are in the public interest to disclose
- reasonably believe they are making the disclosure to the relevant person or body
A qualifying disclosure is also a protected disclosure if it is made:
- to a government minister or a Northern Ireland Department Permanent Secretary by someone working in a government-appointed organisation - this could be directly or via departmental officials and in the public interest to disclose
- to a legal adviser in the course of obtaining legal advice - there are no further conditions attached
Other circumstances where an external disclosure is protected
A qualifying disclosure continues to be a protected disclosure if the conditions below are met.
Firstly, the worker must:
- not act for personal gain
- reasonably believe the information - and any allegation contained in it - is substantially true
In addition, one or more of the following conditions must be met:
- the worker must have previously disclosed the same information to their employer or to a prescribed person
- the worker reasonably believed they would be subjected to a detriment by their employer if the disclosure was made to the employer or a prescribed person
- in the absence of an appropriate prescribed person, the worker reasonably believed that disclosure to the employer would result in the destruction or concealment of information about the wrongdoing
Finally, it must be reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure. An industrial tribunal/arbitrator will decide whether the worker acted reasonably in all the circumstances, particularly taking into account:
- the seriousness of the relevant failure
- whether the relevant failure is continuing or likely to occur again
- whether the worker followed any internal procedures approved by the employer
- what action has, or might reasonably be expected to have, been taken where a previous disclosure was made to the employer or a prescribed person
- whether the disclosure breaches the employer's duty of confidentiality to others
- the identity of the person to whom the disclosure was made
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-qualifying-disclosures
Links
Whistleblowing: Exceptionally serious failures
How workers are protected when reporting an exceptionally serious failure in the workplace.
If the relevant failure is exceptionally serious, any qualifying disclosure made externally will be protected if the worker:
- does not act for personal gain
- reasonably believes the information disclosed, and any allegation contained in it, are substantially true
Also, it must be reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure in view of all the circumstances - with particular regard to the identity of the person to whom the disclosure is made.
Only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can decide whether or not the relevant failure is exceptionally serious. This will be a matter of fact and not simply a matter of the worker reasonably believing it to be exceptionally serious.
Raising a grievance and making protected disclosures
Employees do not necessarily have to raise a grievance in order to make a protected disclosure.
For more information about grievance procedures, see our guide on handling grievances.
There may be good reasons why a worker wishes their identity to remain confidential. The law does not compel an organisation to protect the confidentiality of a whistleblower. However, it is considered best practice to maintain that confidentiality, unless required by law to disclose it.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-exceptionally-serious-failures
Links
Whistleblowing: Right of complaint to an industrial tribunal
If an employee is dismissed for making a protected disclosure, they may bring a claim to an employment tribunal.
An employee may bring a claim for unfair dismissal if they are dismissed for making a protected disclosure. A tribunal/arbitrator will find any such dismissal to be automatically unfair.
An employee or other worker who believes they have been subjected to a detriment for making a protected disclosure can bring a complaint of detrimental treatment.
A worker subjected to a detriment by a co-worker in the course of that co-worker's employment with the employer, on the grounds that the worker made a protected disclosure, may be able to take a case to an Industrial Tribunal against both the co-worker and their employer.
A detriment can be either an act or a deliberate decision not to act by the employer. Whether an employee or other worker has suffered a detriment will be decided by the tribunal/arbitrator.
Examples of detrimental treatment include:
- threats of dismissal
- withholding a pay rise
- discrimination in promotion, transfer, or training opportunities
- failure to confer a benefit on a person who failed to accept an unlawful inducement that would have been conferred on them had they accepted the offer
Workers who are not employees cannot claim unfair dismissal. However, their dismissal could amount to a detriment and therefore they could still bring a detrimental treatment claim.
Remedies
Where a tribunal or arbitrator finds that an employee's complaint of unfair dismissal is justified, they will order either:
- reinstatement/re-employment
- the payment of compensation
Where an employee or other worker complains they have been subjected to a detriment and the tribunal or arbitrator finds the complaint well-founded, they will make a declaration to that effect and may order the payment of compensation.
An industrial tribunal will have the discretion to reduce a compensatory award by up to 25% in the event that it finds the disclosure has not been made in good faith.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-right-complaint-industrial-tribunal
Links
Unfair dismissal: employee eligibility
In this guide:
- Dismissing employees
- Types of employee dismissal
- Fair dismissal
- Unfair dismissal
- Unfair dismissal: employee eligibility
- Dismissals on capability grounds
- Dismissals relating to industrial action
- Dismissal due to illness
- Dismissals on conduct grounds
- Whistleblowing and dismissal
- Whistleblowing: Qualifying disclosures
- Whistleblowing: Exceptionally serious failures
- Whistleblowing: Right of complaint to an industrial tribunal
Types of employee dismissal
The different types of staff dismissal and unfair dismissal claims.
There are several types of staff dismissal:
- fair dismissal
- unfair dismissal
- constructive dismissal
- wrongful dismissal
Fair and unfair dismissal
A dismissal is fair or unfair depending on your reason or reasons for dismissal and whether you act reasonably during the dismissal process. Industrial tribunals/arbitrators follow previous legal decisions in deciding what is reasonable. What is unfair dismissal and what is fair dismissal?
Constructive dismissal
Constructive dismissal occurs where an employee resigns because you have substantially breached their employment contract, for example:
- cutting wages without agreement
- unlawfully demoting them
- allowing colleagues to subject them to harassment, bullying, victimisation, humiliation or discrimination
- unfairly increasing their workload
- changing the location of their workplace without contractual authority
- making them work in dangerous conditions
The breach of contract can result from either a single serious event or the last in a series of less serious events.
An individual may claim constructive unfair dismissal. A constructive dismissal is not necessarily an unfair one but it's hard for an employer to show that an action in breach of the contract was, in fact, fair.
Wrongful dismissal
Wrongful dismissal is where a contractual term is broken in the dismissal process, for example, dismissing an employee without giving them proper notice.
For further information see the Employers' Handbook Section 18: Disciplinary issues and dismissal (PDF, 95K).
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/types-employee-dismissal
Links
Fair dismissal
You must have a valid reason for dismissing an employee - understand the reasons that constitute a fair dismissal.
To dismiss an employee fairly, you must first have a fair reason for doing so. Potential reasons for fair dismissal include:
- conduct
- capability
- redundancy
- a statutory requirement which could prevent the employment continuing, such as a driver losing their driving licence
- some other substantial reason - any other potentially fair reasons fall into this category
An example of 'some other substantial reason' would be the dismissal of an employee who was taken on as a temporary replacement for an employee on maternity leave. For such a dismissal to be fair, you must have told the replacement employee at the beginning of their employment that the job was only temporary.
In order for any dismissal to be fair, you must also act reasonably and fairly during the dismissal procedure.
Acting reasonably
There is no statutory definition of 'reasonableness'. Reasonableness will be judged taking into account the employer's size and resources and will also consider whether the employer:
- raised and dealt with the issue promptly and consistently throughout the process
- genuinely believed that the reason for dismissal was a potentially fair one
- had reasonable grounds for that belief
- carried out proper and reasonable investigations where appropriate
- followed statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures
- informed the employee in writing why they were being considered for dismissal and listened to their views
- allowed the employee to be accompanied at disciplinary/dismissal hearings and appeals
- gave the employee the chance to appeal against the decision to dismiss
Reasonableness may also depend on whether the employee could be expected to understand the consequences of their behaviour.
Dismissal and disciplinary procedures
You must set out your dismissal and disciplinary rules and procedures in writing. Sample dismissal procedures (DOC, 14K).
There is a minimum statutory procedure that must be followed when you decide to dismiss an employee. Failure to follow this procedure may result in a finding of automatic unfair dismissal.
If you fail to follow the statutory procedure, where it applies, and the issue is subsequently heard by a tribunal, any compensation awarded to the employee could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
You should follow the good practice advice set out in the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance.
Additional advice, including sample procedures, can be found in the LRA guidance on advice on handling discipline and grievances at work.
Though tribunals/arbitrators do not have to take this booklet into account, it provides more detail and guidance which may be helpful.
Summary dismissals
Summary dismissal is the dismissal of an employee without notice or pay in lieu of notice - this occurs when they have committed an act of gross misconduct.
You should investigate the circumstances of the misconduct before dismissing the employee.
However, if you feel that you have no choice but to dismiss an employee, you must still follow statutory procedures.
Staff probationary periods
If you decide to dismiss an employee during their probationary period, you must follow at least the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure.
Third-party pressure to dismiss an employee
If a customer or client threatens to withdraw their business unless you dismiss one of your employees, only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can determine whether or not such a dismissal is fair. Such dismissals are normally categorised as 'some other substantial reason'.
You cannot however take into account pressure exerted by a trade union by the calling or threatening of industrial action.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/fair-dismissal
Links
Unfair dismissal
Reasons that automatically constitute the unfair dismissal of an employee.
Even if you think you have dismissed an employee fairly, they could decide to bring an unfair dismissal claim because they believe that:
- the reason you gave for the dismissal wasn't the real one
- you dismissed them for an unfair reason - see unfair dismissal
- you acted unreasonably, eg by failing to give the employee plenty of warning in the run-up to taking the decision to dismiss them
How to fairly dismiss an employee fairly
If you think you may have to dismiss an employee, make sure that you:
- Have a fair reason for dismissal.
- Follow - at the very least - the statutory dismissal procedure. If you unreasonably fail to follow the statutory dismissal procedure and the issue is heard at tribunal, any compensation awarded to the employee could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
- Follow any contractual disciplinary/dismissal procedure you may have, as well as the guidance outlined in the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance Procedures. Your contractual procedure should comply with the code.
See fair dismissal.
Penalties for unfair dismissals
If an employee has been unfairly dismissed, the employer may be ordered to reinstate or reengage the employee. This however is an exceptional outcome.
Invariably, a tribunal or arbitrator will award compensation, made up of a basic award that depends on the employee's age, gross weekly pay, length of service, and a compensatory award.
They can also make an additional award if you fail to follow an order to reinstate or re-engage the employee.
Apart from in health and safety and whistleblowing cases, there is a limit on the amount which can be awarded for unfair dismissal. For the latest limits on awards, see our table of current tribunal and arbitration compensation limits.
The Labour Relations Agency Arbitration Scheme
The Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Arbitration Scheme provides an alternative to having a case heard by a tribunal to resolve an employment-related dispute (for example, claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract or discrimination, etc).
The scheme is quicker, confidential, non-legalistic, less formal, and more cost-effective than a tribunal hearing.
Under the scheme, an arbitrator's decision is binding as a matter of law and has the same effect as a tribunal.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/unfair-dismissal
Links
Unfair dismissal: employee eligibility
Employer consequences if you dismiss someone unfairly.
Employees can usually only claim unfair dismissal if they have worked for you for at least one year.
There are a number of reasons for dismissal that are automatically unfair. Most of these do not require the employee to have a minimum of one year's service, ie the employee will be able to claim unfair dismissal from day one of employment.
Who cannot complain to a tribunal about unfair dismissal?
The right to complain to a tribunal about unfair dismissal is also not available to:
- Self-employed people.
- Those who are not employees, eg casual workers, independent contractors or freelance agents.
- Members of the armed forces.
- Employees who have reached a settlement with their employer via Labour Relations Agency (LRA) conciliation.
- Individuals working under an illegal contract, eg a barman who is under the age of 18 years old or employees in receipt of untaxed monies.
- Employees covered by a dismissal procedure agreement that has been exempted from the unfair dismissal provisions by legislation. This is a rarely exercised legal provision.
- Employees taking part in unofficial industrial action (unless the dismissal is for certain specified reasons, eg taking family leave or making a protected disclosure). For more information, see the page in this guide on dismissals relating to industrial action.
- The police (although police staff may make unfair dismissal claims where the dismissal relates to health and safety or the making of a protected disclosure).
- Those employed as a master - or as a member of the crew - of a fishing vessel where the individual is paid only by a share in the profits or gross earnings of the vessel.
- Employees who have reached a settlement with their employer via a 'compromise agreement'. This is an agreement reached, with the benefit of a relevant independent advisor who has professional indemnity insurance, in which the employee waives their right to make a complaint in relation to the dispute to which the settlement relates. This means that the agreement must specify the legal basis for the dispute - it cannot state that it covers all the possible employment-related claims.
Exemption from the unfair dismissal provisions
The parties to a dismissal-procedures agreement can apply jointly to the Department for the Economy to substitute provisions of the unfair dismissal legislation. Such substitution may be allowed if all the following points are satisfied:
- every trade union which is a party to the agreement is independent
- the agreement has a procedure to be followed if an employee claims to have been unfairly dismissed
- the procedure is non-discriminatory and available to all relevant employees
- the procedure gives employees a similar level of protection to that provided by the legislation
- the agreement includes provision either for arbitration in every case or allows arbitration in cases where a decision can't be reached or where a decision raises a question of law
- the agreement clearly defines which employees it applies to
Lay-offs and short-time working
You may temporarily lay off an employee or put them on short-time working, eg because of a downturn in work. This does not necessarily amount to a redundancy dismissal. You can only do this if the terms of their contract of employment allow it or by agreement with the employee. See Employers' Handbook Section 23: Lay-off and short time working (PDF, 33K).
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/unfair-dismissal-employee-eligibility
Links
Dismissals on capability grounds
How to dismiss an employee fairly when they are incapable of doing their job properly or commit some form of misconduct.
Sometimes an employee is incapable of doing their job to the required standard. This may be because they don't have the right skills or aptitude for the job.
They may also be capable of doing their job, but unwilling or reluctant to do it properly. In these particular circumstances, you would deal with the issue as one of misconduct and follow your company disciplinary procedures and the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures (if they apply). Otherwise capability is a separate dismissal category to misconduct. See dismissals on conduct grounds.
In most cases involving capability, you can help an employee improve by taking informal action, eg by offering training/mentoring or another suitable job (you would only redeploy to another suitable job if this is something that they agree to at this stage).
Capability dismissals: lack of skills/aptitude
To ensure that any resulting capability dismissal is fair when formal action is taken - you should:
- Inform the employee in writing of the performance issues that exist and invite them to a meeting to discuss these issues.
- Following the meeting, give an employee who is found to be performing unsatisfactorily a written note, as a summary and explanation ideally, setting out the performance problems identified at the meeting, the improvement that is required, a reasonable timescale for achieving this improvement, a review date and any identified measures of support you will provide to assist them to meet the required standards.
- Inform your employee that the note represents the first stage of a formal procedure and that failure to improve could lead to a final written warning and, ultimately, dismissal. You should keep a copy of the note and use it as the basis for monitoring and reviewing performance over the specified timescale - see managing staff performance. You should also inform the employee that they may appeal at any stage of the formal process.
- If there is a failure to improve in the timescale outlined, repeat the above procedure and issue a final written warning.
- If again there is a failure to improve within the timescale set out in the final written warning, this may result in dismissal.
- Finally, you should note that some exceptional acts of incapability can merit summary dismissal.
- Throughout the formal process, employees have the right to be accompanied to all meetings and appeal meetings and to appeal to a more senior manager - ideally one not involved in the initial meetings. To read more on the right to be accompanied, read the LRA Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-capability-grounds
Links
Dismissal due to illness
How to handle dismissing an employee due to long-term ill health.
Dismissal due to capability may also include instances where the employer dismisses because the employee is no longer capable of doing the job they were employed to do because of illness.
Occasionally an employee may have to leave your employment because of long-term ill health. Sometimes the employee will simply choose to resign. However, you might eventually have to consider dismissing them.
In order for a dismissal to be potentially fair, you must ensure that you regularly communicate and consult with the employee, take appropriate medical advice, consider the effects of the absence on the business, consider alternatives to dismissal and, if appropriate, take account of any reasonable adjustments as required under disability discrimination legislation. See employ and support people with disabilities.
Finally, before dismissing an employee you must also ensure you comply with the statutory dismissal procedures.
Prior to dismissal due to illness
Before dismissing an employee, you should consider as many ways as possible to help them back to work - dismissal is a last resort and could be unfair if not handled properly. It is also very important that you determine whether or not they are disabled under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
You can consider getting a medical report from their GP (with their written permission), or an occupational health assessment. Remember to ask the questions that are relevant to the job, as this will enable you to get the information you need to make an informed decision. The employee has the right to see the GP report before you and may choose not to disclose some information.
If their continued employment is no longer feasible because there are no reasonable adjustments that can be made, it may be fair for you to dismiss them.
During any dismissal procedure, you should treat all employees with sensitivity. You should also act fairly and reasonably. Your dismissal procedure must follow the statutory dismissal requirements.
If you unreasonably fail to follow the statutory dismissal procedures when dismissing and the employee is successful in unfair dismissal proceedings, any compensation awarded by the tribunal or arbitrator could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
If the employee who is subject to the procedure is disabled, you will also have to consider making any possible reasonable adjustments to allow for their needs; you have to address disability discrimination laws, so this is important.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissal-due-illness
Links
Dismissals relating to industrial action
How to ensure that you dismiss an employee fairly for reasons relating to industrial action.
It is automatically unfair to dismiss workers for taking part in official industrial action:
- In the 12-week period from the day the industrial action starts.
- That lasts longer than 12 weeks - but only if you haven't taken reasonable steps to resolve the dispute. Only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can decide whether or not you've taken the necessary steps to resolve the dispute.
Subject to some exceptions (see below), an employee dismissed while taking part in unofficial industrial action can't generally claim unfair dismissal.
For the difference between official and unofficial industrial action, see our guide on industrial disputes.
If you 'lock-out' employees taking industrial action, the days of the lock-out are not included in the calculation of the 12-week protected period. A lock-out is where you prevent employees from getting to their workplace, eg by locking the doors to the premises.
Apart from this - subject to some exceptions (see below) - an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can't hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while taking part in official industrial action as long as you have:
- dismissed all those who were taking part in the action on the same date that you dismissed the person complaining of unfair dismissal
- not offered re-engagement to any dismissed employee within three months of the dismissal date without making the person complaining of unfair dismissal a similar offer
Exceptions
The exceptions are that a tribunal/arbitrator can hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while taking part in industrial action - either official or unofficial - if the main reason:
- was that the employee took certain specified types of action on health and safety grounds
- related to maternity/paternity/adoption/parental/shared parental/parental bereavement leave, pregnancy or time off for a dependant
- was that the employee exercised their rights under the Working Time Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016
- related to the right to request flexible working arrangements
- was that the employee had been summoned or took time off work for jury service
- was that the employee took certain specified types of action as an employee representative or as a candidate to become one, or taking part in the election of such a representative
An industrial tribunal/arbitrator can also hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while participating in unofficial industrial action if the reason or main reason for the dismissal was that the employee made a protected disclosure.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-relating-industrial-action
Links
Dismissals on conduct grounds
How to dismiss employees involved in incidents of misconduct.
If you find that an employee has been involved in an incident of misconduct, the action you take depends on how serious it is. For example:
- If the misconduct relates to a minor issue, the penalty for a first offence would normally be a verbal warning. This would be followed by a written warning if the offence is repeated within a specified timescale. Further occurrences would result in a final written warning and ultimately dismissal if repeated again.
- If the misconduct relates to a more serious issue, the employer may issue a final written warning for a first offence followed by dismissal for any further repeat of the offence within a specified time scale.
- The Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice applies the statutory procedures to the issue of warnings as a matter of good practice.
- If the misconduct is of a very serious nature, the employer may dismiss for a first offence.
- No disciplinary action should be taken until there has been a thorough investigation into the alleged misconduct.
- Details of the alleged misconduct should be set out in writing and given to the employee prior to any hearing taking place.
- The employee must be offered the right to appeal against any decision taken within the formal procedure
- Throughout the formal process, employees have the right to be accompanied to all meetings and appeal meetings and to appeal to a more senior manager - ideally one not involved in the initial meetings
- The LRA Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures recommends that verbal warnings remain on file for a six-month period and written warnings for a 12-month period.
Discipline and dismissal have a statutory procedure which must be followed and if it is not, where it applies, this may result in a finding of automatic unfair dismissal.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-conduct-grounds
Links
Whistleblowing and dismissal
Protection from dismissal or detrimental treatment for workers who disclose a suspected relevant failure at work.
Workers who suspect wrongdoing and 'blow the whistle' to disclose these concerns to their employer are protected from dismissal or other negative consequences - as long as certain criteria are met. This law intends to help businesses quickly identify and resolve such problems.
The term 'workers' refers to those who work under:
- a contract of employment, eg employees
- some other contract to perform work personally, eg casual workers
It does not cover the genuinely self-employed.
The whistleblowing law also covers NHS practitioners, such as:
- GPs
- certain dentists
- pharmacists
- opticians
It also covers:
- agency workers
- certain categories of trainee
- those who contract to provide services to the Department of Health
- those who contract to provide services to a business via their own limited company - even if introduced via an employment agency or employment business
- student nurses and student midwives who undertake work experience as part of a course of education or training approved by, or under arrangements with, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC)
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-and-dismissal
Links
Whistleblowing: Qualifying disclosures
The types of disclosure that are eligible for protection from dismissal.
The types of disclosure that are eligible for protection are known as 'qualifying disclosures'.
These are where the worker reasonably believes that the disclosure is being made in the public interest and at least one 'relevant failure' is currently happening, took place in the past, or is likely to happen in the future.
Relevant failures can be:
- a criminal offence
- a miscarriage of justice
- damage to the environment
- the breach of a legal obligation
- a danger to the health or safety of any individual
- the deliberate covering up of information tending to show any of these matters
The same protection applies even if the qualifying disclosure concerns a relevant failure overseas or where the applicable law is not that of the UK.
Disclosures that can be characterised as being of a personal rather than public interest, will not be protected.
The belief does not need to be correct. The worker only needs to show that they held the belief and that it was a reasonable belief in the circumstances at the time they made the disclosure.
The disclosure is not a qualifying disclosure if:
- by making the disclosure, the worker has committed an offence, eg under the Official Secrets Act 1989
- the information should be protected from disclosure because of legal professional privilege, eg the disclosure has been made by a legal adviser (or their secretary) who has acquired the information in the course of providing legal advice
Qualifying disclosures made internally
A worker is protected if they make a qualifying disclosure to either:
- their employer - either directly or by using a procedure authorised by the employer for that purpose
- to another person who the worker reasonably believes to be solely or mainly responsible for the relevant failure
Ideally, you should have a whistleblowing policy that includes a procedure to follow if a worker wishes to make a qualifying disclosure.
Qualifying disclosures made externally
A worker is protected if they make a qualifying disclosure to an appropriate 'prescribed person'. These are certain statutory bodies - or people within them - who have the authority to receive disclosures relevant to the role of that particular body. Breaches in health and safety law, for example, can be brought to the attention of the Health and Safety Executive for Northern Ireland or the appropriate local council.
Public Interest Disclosure guidance.
For the disclosure to be protected, the worker must:
- reasonably believe the information and any allegation it contains are substantially true and are in the public interest to disclose
- reasonably believe they are making the disclosure to the relevant person or body
A qualifying disclosure is also a protected disclosure if it is made:
- to a government minister or a Northern Ireland Department Permanent Secretary by someone working in a government-appointed organisation - this could be directly or via departmental officials and in the public interest to disclose
- to a legal adviser in the course of obtaining legal advice - there are no further conditions attached
Other circumstances where an external disclosure is protected
A qualifying disclosure continues to be a protected disclosure if the conditions below are met.
Firstly, the worker must:
- not act for personal gain
- reasonably believe the information - and any allegation contained in it - is substantially true
In addition, one or more of the following conditions must be met:
- the worker must have previously disclosed the same information to their employer or to a prescribed person
- the worker reasonably believed they would be subjected to a detriment by their employer if the disclosure was made to the employer or a prescribed person
- in the absence of an appropriate prescribed person, the worker reasonably believed that disclosure to the employer would result in the destruction or concealment of information about the wrongdoing
Finally, it must be reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure. An industrial tribunal/arbitrator will decide whether the worker acted reasonably in all the circumstances, particularly taking into account:
- the seriousness of the relevant failure
- whether the relevant failure is continuing or likely to occur again
- whether the worker followed any internal procedures approved by the employer
- what action has, or might reasonably be expected to have, been taken where a previous disclosure was made to the employer or a prescribed person
- whether the disclosure breaches the employer's duty of confidentiality to others
- the identity of the person to whom the disclosure was made
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-qualifying-disclosures
Links
Whistleblowing: Exceptionally serious failures
How workers are protected when reporting an exceptionally serious failure in the workplace.
If the relevant failure is exceptionally serious, any qualifying disclosure made externally will be protected if the worker:
- does not act for personal gain
- reasonably believes the information disclosed, and any allegation contained in it, are substantially true
Also, it must be reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure in view of all the circumstances - with particular regard to the identity of the person to whom the disclosure is made.
Only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can decide whether or not the relevant failure is exceptionally serious. This will be a matter of fact and not simply a matter of the worker reasonably believing it to be exceptionally serious.
Raising a grievance and making protected disclosures
Employees do not necessarily have to raise a grievance in order to make a protected disclosure.
For more information about grievance procedures, see our guide on handling grievances.
There may be good reasons why a worker wishes their identity to remain confidential. The law does not compel an organisation to protect the confidentiality of a whistleblower. However, it is considered best practice to maintain that confidentiality, unless required by law to disclose it.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-exceptionally-serious-failures
Links
Whistleblowing: Right of complaint to an industrial tribunal
If an employee is dismissed for making a protected disclosure, they may bring a claim to an employment tribunal.
An employee may bring a claim for unfair dismissal if they are dismissed for making a protected disclosure. A tribunal/arbitrator will find any such dismissal to be automatically unfair.
An employee or other worker who believes they have been subjected to a detriment for making a protected disclosure can bring a complaint of detrimental treatment.
A worker subjected to a detriment by a co-worker in the course of that co-worker's employment with the employer, on the grounds that the worker made a protected disclosure, may be able to take a case to an Industrial Tribunal against both the co-worker and their employer.
A detriment can be either an act or a deliberate decision not to act by the employer. Whether an employee or other worker has suffered a detriment will be decided by the tribunal/arbitrator.
Examples of detrimental treatment include:
- threats of dismissal
- withholding a pay rise
- discrimination in promotion, transfer, or training opportunities
- failure to confer a benefit on a person who failed to accept an unlawful inducement that would have been conferred on them had they accepted the offer
Workers who are not employees cannot claim unfair dismissal. However, their dismissal could amount to a detriment and therefore they could still bring a detrimental treatment claim.
Remedies
Where a tribunal or arbitrator finds that an employee's complaint of unfair dismissal is justified, they will order either:
- reinstatement/re-employment
- the payment of compensation
Where an employee or other worker complains they have been subjected to a detriment and the tribunal or arbitrator finds the complaint well-founded, they will make a declaration to that effect and may order the payment of compensation.
An industrial tribunal will have the discretion to reduce a compensatory award by up to 25% in the event that it finds the disclosure has not been made in good faith.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-right-complaint-industrial-tribunal
Links
Unfair dismissal
In this guide:
- Dismissing employees
- Types of employee dismissal
- Fair dismissal
- Unfair dismissal
- Unfair dismissal: employee eligibility
- Dismissals on capability grounds
- Dismissals relating to industrial action
- Dismissal due to illness
- Dismissals on conduct grounds
- Whistleblowing and dismissal
- Whistleblowing: Qualifying disclosures
- Whistleblowing: Exceptionally serious failures
- Whistleblowing: Right of complaint to an industrial tribunal
Types of employee dismissal
The different types of staff dismissal and unfair dismissal claims.
There are several types of staff dismissal:
- fair dismissal
- unfair dismissal
- constructive dismissal
- wrongful dismissal
Fair and unfair dismissal
A dismissal is fair or unfair depending on your reason or reasons for dismissal and whether you act reasonably during the dismissal process. Industrial tribunals/arbitrators follow previous legal decisions in deciding what is reasonable. What is unfair dismissal and what is fair dismissal?
Constructive dismissal
Constructive dismissal occurs where an employee resigns because you have substantially breached their employment contract, for example:
- cutting wages without agreement
- unlawfully demoting them
- allowing colleagues to subject them to harassment, bullying, victimisation, humiliation or discrimination
- unfairly increasing their workload
- changing the location of their workplace without contractual authority
- making them work in dangerous conditions
The breach of contract can result from either a single serious event or the last in a series of less serious events.
An individual may claim constructive unfair dismissal. A constructive dismissal is not necessarily an unfair one but it's hard for an employer to show that an action in breach of the contract was, in fact, fair.
Wrongful dismissal
Wrongful dismissal is where a contractual term is broken in the dismissal process, for example, dismissing an employee without giving them proper notice.
For further information see the Employers' Handbook Section 18: Disciplinary issues and dismissal (PDF, 95K).
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/types-employee-dismissal
Links
Fair dismissal
You must have a valid reason for dismissing an employee - understand the reasons that constitute a fair dismissal.
To dismiss an employee fairly, you must first have a fair reason for doing so. Potential reasons for fair dismissal include:
- conduct
- capability
- redundancy
- a statutory requirement which could prevent the employment continuing, such as a driver losing their driving licence
- some other substantial reason - any other potentially fair reasons fall into this category
An example of 'some other substantial reason' would be the dismissal of an employee who was taken on as a temporary replacement for an employee on maternity leave. For such a dismissal to be fair, you must have told the replacement employee at the beginning of their employment that the job was only temporary.
In order for any dismissal to be fair, you must also act reasonably and fairly during the dismissal procedure.
Acting reasonably
There is no statutory definition of 'reasonableness'. Reasonableness will be judged taking into account the employer's size and resources and will also consider whether the employer:
- raised and dealt with the issue promptly and consistently throughout the process
- genuinely believed that the reason for dismissal was a potentially fair one
- had reasonable grounds for that belief
- carried out proper and reasonable investigations where appropriate
- followed statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures
- informed the employee in writing why they were being considered for dismissal and listened to their views
- allowed the employee to be accompanied at disciplinary/dismissal hearings and appeals
- gave the employee the chance to appeal against the decision to dismiss
Reasonableness may also depend on whether the employee could be expected to understand the consequences of their behaviour.
Dismissal and disciplinary procedures
You must set out your dismissal and disciplinary rules and procedures in writing. Sample dismissal procedures (DOC, 14K).
There is a minimum statutory procedure that must be followed when you decide to dismiss an employee. Failure to follow this procedure may result in a finding of automatic unfair dismissal.
If you fail to follow the statutory procedure, where it applies, and the issue is subsequently heard by a tribunal, any compensation awarded to the employee could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
You should follow the good practice advice set out in the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance.
Additional advice, including sample procedures, can be found in the LRA guidance on advice on handling discipline and grievances at work.
Though tribunals/arbitrators do not have to take this booklet into account, it provides more detail and guidance which may be helpful.
Summary dismissals
Summary dismissal is the dismissal of an employee without notice or pay in lieu of notice - this occurs when they have committed an act of gross misconduct.
You should investigate the circumstances of the misconduct before dismissing the employee.
However, if you feel that you have no choice but to dismiss an employee, you must still follow statutory procedures.
Staff probationary periods
If you decide to dismiss an employee during their probationary period, you must follow at least the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure.
Third-party pressure to dismiss an employee
If a customer or client threatens to withdraw their business unless you dismiss one of your employees, only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can determine whether or not such a dismissal is fair. Such dismissals are normally categorised as 'some other substantial reason'.
You cannot however take into account pressure exerted by a trade union by the calling or threatening of industrial action.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/fair-dismissal
Links
Unfair dismissal
Reasons that automatically constitute the unfair dismissal of an employee.
Even if you think you have dismissed an employee fairly, they could decide to bring an unfair dismissal claim because they believe that:
- the reason you gave for the dismissal wasn't the real one
- you dismissed them for an unfair reason - see unfair dismissal
- you acted unreasonably, eg by failing to give the employee plenty of warning in the run-up to taking the decision to dismiss them
How to fairly dismiss an employee fairly
If you think you may have to dismiss an employee, make sure that you:
- Have a fair reason for dismissal.
- Follow - at the very least - the statutory dismissal procedure. If you unreasonably fail to follow the statutory dismissal procedure and the issue is heard at tribunal, any compensation awarded to the employee could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
- Follow any contractual disciplinary/dismissal procedure you may have, as well as the guidance outlined in the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance Procedures. Your contractual procedure should comply with the code.
See fair dismissal.
Penalties for unfair dismissals
If an employee has been unfairly dismissed, the employer may be ordered to reinstate or reengage the employee. This however is an exceptional outcome.
Invariably, a tribunal or arbitrator will award compensation, made up of a basic award that depends on the employee's age, gross weekly pay, length of service, and a compensatory award.
They can also make an additional award if you fail to follow an order to reinstate or re-engage the employee.
Apart from in health and safety and whistleblowing cases, there is a limit on the amount which can be awarded for unfair dismissal. For the latest limits on awards, see our table of current tribunal and arbitration compensation limits.
The Labour Relations Agency Arbitration Scheme
The Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Arbitration Scheme provides an alternative to having a case heard by a tribunal to resolve an employment-related dispute (for example, claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract or discrimination, etc).
The scheme is quicker, confidential, non-legalistic, less formal, and more cost-effective than a tribunal hearing.
Under the scheme, an arbitrator's decision is binding as a matter of law and has the same effect as a tribunal.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/unfair-dismissal
Links
Unfair dismissal: employee eligibility
Employer consequences if you dismiss someone unfairly.
Employees can usually only claim unfair dismissal if they have worked for you for at least one year.
There are a number of reasons for dismissal that are automatically unfair. Most of these do not require the employee to have a minimum of one year's service, ie the employee will be able to claim unfair dismissal from day one of employment.
Who cannot complain to a tribunal about unfair dismissal?
The right to complain to a tribunal about unfair dismissal is also not available to:
- Self-employed people.
- Those who are not employees, eg casual workers, independent contractors or freelance agents.
- Members of the armed forces.
- Employees who have reached a settlement with their employer via Labour Relations Agency (LRA) conciliation.
- Individuals working under an illegal contract, eg a barman who is under the age of 18 years old or employees in receipt of untaxed monies.
- Employees covered by a dismissal procedure agreement that has been exempted from the unfair dismissal provisions by legislation. This is a rarely exercised legal provision.
- Employees taking part in unofficial industrial action (unless the dismissal is for certain specified reasons, eg taking family leave or making a protected disclosure). For more information, see the page in this guide on dismissals relating to industrial action.
- The police (although police staff may make unfair dismissal claims where the dismissal relates to health and safety or the making of a protected disclosure).
- Those employed as a master - or as a member of the crew - of a fishing vessel where the individual is paid only by a share in the profits or gross earnings of the vessel.
- Employees who have reached a settlement with their employer via a 'compromise agreement'. This is an agreement reached, with the benefit of a relevant independent advisor who has professional indemnity insurance, in which the employee waives their right to make a complaint in relation to the dispute to which the settlement relates. This means that the agreement must specify the legal basis for the dispute - it cannot state that it covers all the possible employment-related claims.
Exemption from the unfair dismissal provisions
The parties to a dismissal-procedures agreement can apply jointly to the Department for the Economy to substitute provisions of the unfair dismissal legislation. Such substitution may be allowed if all the following points are satisfied:
- every trade union which is a party to the agreement is independent
- the agreement has a procedure to be followed if an employee claims to have been unfairly dismissed
- the procedure is non-discriminatory and available to all relevant employees
- the procedure gives employees a similar level of protection to that provided by the legislation
- the agreement includes provision either for arbitration in every case or allows arbitration in cases where a decision can't be reached or where a decision raises a question of law
- the agreement clearly defines which employees it applies to
Lay-offs and short-time working
You may temporarily lay off an employee or put them on short-time working, eg because of a downturn in work. This does not necessarily amount to a redundancy dismissal. You can only do this if the terms of their contract of employment allow it or by agreement with the employee. See Employers' Handbook Section 23: Lay-off and short time working (PDF, 33K).
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/unfair-dismissal-employee-eligibility
Links
Dismissals on capability grounds
How to dismiss an employee fairly when they are incapable of doing their job properly or commit some form of misconduct.
Sometimes an employee is incapable of doing their job to the required standard. This may be because they don't have the right skills or aptitude for the job.
They may also be capable of doing their job, but unwilling or reluctant to do it properly. In these particular circumstances, you would deal with the issue as one of misconduct and follow your company disciplinary procedures and the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures (if they apply). Otherwise capability is a separate dismissal category to misconduct. See dismissals on conduct grounds.
In most cases involving capability, you can help an employee improve by taking informal action, eg by offering training/mentoring or another suitable job (you would only redeploy to another suitable job if this is something that they agree to at this stage).
Capability dismissals: lack of skills/aptitude
To ensure that any resulting capability dismissal is fair when formal action is taken - you should:
- Inform the employee in writing of the performance issues that exist and invite them to a meeting to discuss these issues.
- Following the meeting, give an employee who is found to be performing unsatisfactorily a written note, as a summary and explanation ideally, setting out the performance problems identified at the meeting, the improvement that is required, a reasonable timescale for achieving this improvement, a review date and any identified measures of support you will provide to assist them to meet the required standards.
- Inform your employee that the note represents the first stage of a formal procedure and that failure to improve could lead to a final written warning and, ultimately, dismissal. You should keep a copy of the note and use it as the basis for monitoring and reviewing performance over the specified timescale - see managing staff performance. You should also inform the employee that they may appeal at any stage of the formal process.
- If there is a failure to improve in the timescale outlined, repeat the above procedure and issue a final written warning.
- If again there is a failure to improve within the timescale set out in the final written warning, this may result in dismissal.
- Finally, you should note that some exceptional acts of incapability can merit summary dismissal.
- Throughout the formal process, employees have the right to be accompanied to all meetings and appeal meetings and to appeal to a more senior manager - ideally one not involved in the initial meetings. To read more on the right to be accompanied, read the LRA Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-capability-grounds
Links
Dismissal due to illness
How to handle dismissing an employee due to long-term ill health.
Dismissal due to capability may also include instances where the employer dismisses because the employee is no longer capable of doing the job they were employed to do because of illness.
Occasionally an employee may have to leave your employment because of long-term ill health. Sometimes the employee will simply choose to resign. However, you might eventually have to consider dismissing them.
In order for a dismissal to be potentially fair, you must ensure that you regularly communicate and consult with the employee, take appropriate medical advice, consider the effects of the absence on the business, consider alternatives to dismissal and, if appropriate, take account of any reasonable adjustments as required under disability discrimination legislation. See employ and support people with disabilities.
Finally, before dismissing an employee you must also ensure you comply with the statutory dismissal procedures.
Prior to dismissal due to illness
Before dismissing an employee, you should consider as many ways as possible to help them back to work - dismissal is a last resort and could be unfair if not handled properly. It is also very important that you determine whether or not they are disabled under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
You can consider getting a medical report from their GP (with their written permission), or an occupational health assessment. Remember to ask the questions that are relevant to the job, as this will enable you to get the information you need to make an informed decision. The employee has the right to see the GP report before you and may choose not to disclose some information.
If their continued employment is no longer feasible because there are no reasonable adjustments that can be made, it may be fair for you to dismiss them.
During any dismissal procedure, you should treat all employees with sensitivity. You should also act fairly and reasonably. Your dismissal procedure must follow the statutory dismissal requirements.
If you unreasonably fail to follow the statutory dismissal procedures when dismissing and the employee is successful in unfair dismissal proceedings, any compensation awarded by the tribunal or arbitrator could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
If the employee who is subject to the procedure is disabled, you will also have to consider making any possible reasonable adjustments to allow for their needs; you have to address disability discrimination laws, so this is important.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissal-due-illness
Links
Dismissals relating to industrial action
How to ensure that you dismiss an employee fairly for reasons relating to industrial action.
It is automatically unfair to dismiss workers for taking part in official industrial action:
- In the 12-week period from the day the industrial action starts.
- That lasts longer than 12 weeks - but only if you haven't taken reasonable steps to resolve the dispute. Only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can decide whether or not you've taken the necessary steps to resolve the dispute.
Subject to some exceptions (see below), an employee dismissed while taking part in unofficial industrial action can't generally claim unfair dismissal.
For the difference between official and unofficial industrial action, see our guide on industrial disputes.
If you 'lock-out' employees taking industrial action, the days of the lock-out are not included in the calculation of the 12-week protected period. A lock-out is where you prevent employees from getting to their workplace, eg by locking the doors to the premises.
Apart from this - subject to some exceptions (see below) - an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can't hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while taking part in official industrial action as long as you have:
- dismissed all those who were taking part in the action on the same date that you dismissed the person complaining of unfair dismissal
- not offered re-engagement to any dismissed employee within three months of the dismissal date without making the person complaining of unfair dismissal a similar offer
Exceptions
The exceptions are that a tribunal/arbitrator can hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while taking part in industrial action - either official or unofficial - if the main reason:
- was that the employee took certain specified types of action on health and safety grounds
- related to maternity/paternity/adoption/parental/shared parental/parental bereavement leave, pregnancy or time off for a dependant
- was that the employee exercised their rights under the Working Time Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016
- related to the right to request flexible working arrangements
- was that the employee had been summoned or took time off work for jury service
- was that the employee took certain specified types of action as an employee representative or as a candidate to become one, or taking part in the election of such a representative
An industrial tribunal/arbitrator can also hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while participating in unofficial industrial action if the reason or main reason for the dismissal was that the employee made a protected disclosure.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-relating-industrial-action
Links
Dismissals on conduct grounds
How to dismiss employees involved in incidents of misconduct.
If you find that an employee has been involved in an incident of misconduct, the action you take depends on how serious it is. For example:
- If the misconduct relates to a minor issue, the penalty for a first offence would normally be a verbal warning. This would be followed by a written warning if the offence is repeated within a specified timescale. Further occurrences would result in a final written warning and ultimately dismissal if repeated again.
- If the misconduct relates to a more serious issue, the employer may issue a final written warning for a first offence followed by dismissal for any further repeat of the offence within a specified time scale.
- The Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice applies the statutory procedures to the issue of warnings as a matter of good practice.
- If the misconduct is of a very serious nature, the employer may dismiss for a first offence.
- No disciplinary action should be taken until there has been a thorough investigation into the alleged misconduct.
- Details of the alleged misconduct should be set out in writing and given to the employee prior to any hearing taking place.
- The employee must be offered the right to appeal against any decision taken within the formal procedure
- Throughout the formal process, employees have the right to be accompanied to all meetings and appeal meetings and to appeal to a more senior manager - ideally one not involved in the initial meetings
- The LRA Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures recommends that verbal warnings remain on file for a six-month period and written warnings for a 12-month period.
Discipline and dismissal have a statutory procedure which must be followed and if it is not, where it applies, this may result in a finding of automatic unfair dismissal.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-conduct-grounds
Links
Whistleblowing and dismissal
Protection from dismissal or detrimental treatment for workers who disclose a suspected relevant failure at work.
Workers who suspect wrongdoing and 'blow the whistle' to disclose these concerns to their employer are protected from dismissal or other negative consequences - as long as certain criteria are met. This law intends to help businesses quickly identify and resolve such problems.
The term 'workers' refers to those who work under:
- a contract of employment, eg employees
- some other contract to perform work personally, eg casual workers
It does not cover the genuinely self-employed.
The whistleblowing law also covers NHS practitioners, such as:
- GPs
- certain dentists
- pharmacists
- opticians
It also covers:
- agency workers
- certain categories of trainee
- those who contract to provide services to the Department of Health
- those who contract to provide services to a business via their own limited company - even if introduced via an employment agency or employment business
- student nurses and student midwives who undertake work experience as part of a course of education or training approved by, or under arrangements with, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC)
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-and-dismissal
Links
Whistleblowing: Qualifying disclosures
The types of disclosure that are eligible for protection from dismissal.
The types of disclosure that are eligible for protection are known as 'qualifying disclosures'.
These are where the worker reasonably believes that the disclosure is being made in the public interest and at least one 'relevant failure' is currently happening, took place in the past, or is likely to happen in the future.
Relevant failures can be:
- a criminal offence
- a miscarriage of justice
- damage to the environment
- the breach of a legal obligation
- a danger to the health or safety of any individual
- the deliberate covering up of information tending to show any of these matters
The same protection applies even if the qualifying disclosure concerns a relevant failure overseas or where the applicable law is not that of the UK.
Disclosures that can be characterised as being of a personal rather than public interest, will not be protected.
The belief does not need to be correct. The worker only needs to show that they held the belief and that it was a reasonable belief in the circumstances at the time they made the disclosure.
The disclosure is not a qualifying disclosure if:
- by making the disclosure, the worker has committed an offence, eg under the Official Secrets Act 1989
- the information should be protected from disclosure because of legal professional privilege, eg the disclosure has been made by a legal adviser (or their secretary) who has acquired the information in the course of providing legal advice
Qualifying disclosures made internally
A worker is protected if they make a qualifying disclosure to either:
- their employer - either directly or by using a procedure authorised by the employer for that purpose
- to another person who the worker reasonably believes to be solely or mainly responsible for the relevant failure
Ideally, you should have a whistleblowing policy that includes a procedure to follow if a worker wishes to make a qualifying disclosure.
Qualifying disclosures made externally
A worker is protected if they make a qualifying disclosure to an appropriate 'prescribed person'. These are certain statutory bodies - or people within them - who have the authority to receive disclosures relevant to the role of that particular body. Breaches in health and safety law, for example, can be brought to the attention of the Health and Safety Executive for Northern Ireland or the appropriate local council.
Public Interest Disclosure guidance.
For the disclosure to be protected, the worker must:
- reasonably believe the information and any allegation it contains are substantially true and are in the public interest to disclose
- reasonably believe they are making the disclosure to the relevant person or body
A qualifying disclosure is also a protected disclosure if it is made:
- to a government minister or a Northern Ireland Department Permanent Secretary by someone working in a government-appointed organisation - this could be directly or via departmental officials and in the public interest to disclose
- to a legal adviser in the course of obtaining legal advice - there are no further conditions attached
Other circumstances where an external disclosure is protected
A qualifying disclosure continues to be a protected disclosure if the conditions below are met.
Firstly, the worker must:
- not act for personal gain
- reasonably believe the information - and any allegation contained in it - is substantially true
In addition, one or more of the following conditions must be met:
- the worker must have previously disclosed the same information to their employer or to a prescribed person
- the worker reasonably believed they would be subjected to a detriment by their employer if the disclosure was made to the employer or a prescribed person
- in the absence of an appropriate prescribed person, the worker reasonably believed that disclosure to the employer would result in the destruction or concealment of information about the wrongdoing
Finally, it must be reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure. An industrial tribunal/arbitrator will decide whether the worker acted reasonably in all the circumstances, particularly taking into account:
- the seriousness of the relevant failure
- whether the relevant failure is continuing or likely to occur again
- whether the worker followed any internal procedures approved by the employer
- what action has, or might reasonably be expected to have, been taken where a previous disclosure was made to the employer or a prescribed person
- whether the disclosure breaches the employer's duty of confidentiality to others
- the identity of the person to whom the disclosure was made
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-qualifying-disclosures
Links
Whistleblowing: Exceptionally serious failures
How workers are protected when reporting an exceptionally serious failure in the workplace.
If the relevant failure is exceptionally serious, any qualifying disclosure made externally will be protected if the worker:
- does not act for personal gain
- reasonably believes the information disclosed, and any allegation contained in it, are substantially true
Also, it must be reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure in view of all the circumstances - with particular regard to the identity of the person to whom the disclosure is made.
Only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can decide whether or not the relevant failure is exceptionally serious. This will be a matter of fact and not simply a matter of the worker reasonably believing it to be exceptionally serious.
Raising a grievance and making protected disclosures
Employees do not necessarily have to raise a grievance in order to make a protected disclosure.
For more information about grievance procedures, see our guide on handling grievances.
There may be good reasons why a worker wishes their identity to remain confidential. The law does not compel an organisation to protect the confidentiality of a whistleblower. However, it is considered best practice to maintain that confidentiality, unless required by law to disclose it.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-exceptionally-serious-failures
Links
Whistleblowing: Right of complaint to an industrial tribunal
If an employee is dismissed for making a protected disclosure, they may bring a claim to an employment tribunal.
An employee may bring a claim for unfair dismissal if they are dismissed for making a protected disclosure. A tribunal/arbitrator will find any such dismissal to be automatically unfair.
An employee or other worker who believes they have been subjected to a detriment for making a protected disclosure can bring a complaint of detrimental treatment.
A worker subjected to a detriment by a co-worker in the course of that co-worker's employment with the employer, on the grounds that the worker made a protected disclosure, may be able to take a case to an Industrial Tribunal against both the co-worker and their employer.
A detriment can be either an act or a deliberate decision not to act by the employer. Whether an employee or other worker has suffered a detriment will be decided by the tribunal/arbitrator.
Examples of detrimental treatment include:
- threats of dismissal
- withholding a pay rise
- discrimination in promotion, transfer, or training opportunities
- failure to confer a benefit on a person who failed to accept an unlawful inducement that would have been conferred on them had they accepted the offer
Workers who are not employees cannot claim unfair dismissal. However, their dismissal could amount to a detriment and therefore they could still bring a detrimental treatment claim.
Remedies
Where a tribunal or arbitrator finds that an employee's complaint of unfair dismissal is justified, they will order either:
- reinstatement/re-employment
- the payment of compensation
Where an employee or other worker complains they have been subjected to a detriment and the tribunal or arbitrator finds the complaint well-founded, they will make a declaration to that effect and may order the payment of compensation.
An industrial tribunal will have the discretion to reduce a compensatory award by up to 25% in the event that it finds the disclosure has not been made in good faith.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-right-complaint-industrial-tribunal
Links
Fair dismissal
In this guide:
- Dismissing employees
- Types of employee dismissal
- Fair dismissal
- Unfair dismissal
- Unfair dismissal: employee eligibility
- Dismissals on capability grounds
- Dismissals relating to industrial action
- Dismissal due to illness
- Dismissals on conduct grounds
- Whistleblowing and dismissal
- Whistleblowing: Qualifying disclosures
- Whistleblowing: Exceptionally serious failures
- Whistleblowing: Right of complaint to an industrial tribunal
Types of employee dismissal
The different types of staff dismissal and unfair dismissal claims.
There are several types of staff dismissal:
- fair dismissal
- unfair dismissal
- constructive dismissal
- wrongful dismissal
Fair and unfair dismissal
A dismissal is fair or unfair depending on your reason or reasons for dismissal and whether you act reasonably during the dismissal process. Industrial tribunals/arbitrators follow previous legal decisions in deciding what is reasonable. What is unfair dismissal and what is fair dismissal?
Constructive dismissal
Constructive dismissal occurs where an employee resigns because you have substantially breached their employment contract, for example:
- cutting wages without agreement
- unlawfully demoting them
- allowing colleagues to subject them to harassment, bullying, victimisation, humiliation or discrimination
- unfairly increasing their workload
- changing the location of their workplace without contractual authority
- making them work in dangerous conditions
The breach of contract can result from either a single serious event or the last in a series of less serious events.
An individual may claim constructive unfair dismissal. A constructive dismissal is not necessarily an unfair one but it's hard for an employer to show that an action in breach of the contract was, in fact, fair.
Wrongful dismissal
Wrongful dismissal is where a contractual term is broken in the dismissal process, for example, dismissing an employee without giving them proper notice.
For further information see the Employers' Handbook Section 18: Disciplinary issues and dismissal (PDF, 95K).
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/types-employee-dismissal
Links
Fair dismissal
You must have a valid reason for dismissing an employee - understand the reasons that constitute a fair dismissal.
To dismiss an employee fairly, you must first have a fair reason for doing so. Potential reasons for fair dismissal include:
- conduct
- capability
- redundancy
- a statutory requirement which could prevent the employment continuing, such as a driver losing their driving licence
- some other substantial reason - any other potentially fair reasons fall into this category
An example of 'some other substantial reason' would be the dismissal of an employee who was taken on as a temporary replacement for an employee on maternity leave. For such a dismissal to be fair, you must have told the replacement employee at the beginning of their employment that the job was only temporary.
In order for any dismissal to be fair, you must also act reasonably and fairly during the dismissal procedure.
Acting reasonably
There is no statutory definition of 'reasonableness'. Reasonableness will be judged taking into account the employer's size and resources and will also consider whether the employer:
- raised and dealt with the issue promptly and consistently throughout the process
- genuinely believed that the reason for dismissal was a potentially fair one
- had reasonable grounds for that belief
- carried out proper and reasonable investigations where appropriate
- followed statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures
- informed the employee in writing why they were being considered for dismissal and listened to their views
- allowed the employee to be accompanied at disciplinary/dismissal hearings and appeals
- gave the employee the chance to appeal against the decision to dismiss
Reasonableness may also depend on whether the employee could be expected to understand the consequences of their behaviour.
Dismissal and disciplinary procedures
You must set out your dismissal and disciplinary rules and procedures in writing. Sample dismissal procedures (DOC, 14K).
There is a minimum statutory procedure that must be followed when you decide to dismiss an employee. Failure to follow this procedure may result in a finding of automatic unfair dismissal.
If you fail to follow the statutory procedure, where it applies, and the issue is subsequently heard by a tribunal, any compensation awarded to the employee could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
You should follow the good practice advice set out in the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance.
Additional advice, including sample procedures, can be found in the LRA guidance on advice on handling discipline and grievances at work.
Though tribunals/arbitrators do not have to take this booklet into account, it provides more detail and guidance which may be helpful.
Summary dismissals
Summary dismissal is the dismissal of an employee without notice or pay in lieu of notice - this occurs when they have committed an act of gross misconduct.
You should investigate the circumstances of the misconduct before dismissing the employee.
However, if you feel that you have no choice but to dismiss an employee, you must still follow statutory procedures.
Staff probationary periods
If you decide to dismiss an employee during their probationary period, you must follow at least the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure.
Third-party pressure to dismiss an employee
If a customer or client threatens to withdraw their business unless you dismiss one of your employees, only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can determine whether or not such a dismissal is fair. Such dismissals are normally categorised as 'some other substantial reason'.
You cannot however take into account pressure exerted by a trade union by the calling or threatening of industrial action.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/fair-dismissal
Links
Unfair dismissal
Reasons that automatically constitute the unfair dismissal of an employee.
Even if you think you have dismissed an employee fairly, they could decide to bring an unfair dismissal claim because they believe that:
- the reason you gave for the dismissal wasn't the real one
- you dismissed them for an unfair reason - see unfair dismissal
- you acted unreasonably, eg by failing to give the employee plenty of warning in the run-up to taking the decision to dismiss them
How to fairly dismiss an employee fairly
If you think you may have to dismiss an employee, make sure that you:
- Have a fair reason for dismissal.
- Follow - at the very least - the statutory dismissal procedure. If you unreasonably fail to follow the statutory dismissal procedure and the issue is heard at tribunal, any compensation awarded to the employee could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
- Follow any contractual disciplinary/dismissal procedure you may have, as well as the guidance outlined in the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance Procedures. Your contractual procedure should comply with the code.
See fair dismissal.
Penalties for unfair dismissals
If an employee has been unfairly dismissed, the employer may be ordered to reinstate or reengage the employee. This however is an exceptional outcome.
Invariably, a tribunal or arbitrator will award compensation, made up of a basic award that depends on the employee's age, gross weekly pay, length of service, and a compensatory award.
They can also make an additional award if you fail to follow an order to reinstate or re-engage the employee.
Apart from in health and safety and whistleblowing cases, there is a limit on the amount which can be awarded for unfair dismissal. For the latest limits on awards, see our table of current tribunal and arbitration compensation limits.
The Labour Relations Agency Arbitration Scheme
The Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Arbitration Scheme provides an alternative to having a case heard by a tribunal to resolve an employment-related dispute (for example, claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract or discrimination, etc).
The scheme is quicker, confidential, non-legalistic, less formal, and more cost-effective than a tribunal hearing.
Under the scheme, an arbitrator's decision is binding as a matter of law and has the same effect as a tribunal.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/unfair-dismissal
Links
Unfair dismissal: employee eligibility
Employer consequences if you dismiss someone unfairly.
Employees can usually only claim unfair dismissal if they have worked for you for at least one year.
There are a number of reasons for dismissal that are automatically unfair. Most of these do not require the employee to have a minimum of one year's service, ie the employee will be able to claim unfair dismissal from day one of employment.
Who cannot complain to a tribunal about unfair dismissal?
The right to complain to a tribunal about unfair dismissal is also not available to:
- Self-employed people.
- Those who are not employees, eg casual workers, independent contractors or freelance agents.
- Members of the armed forces.
- Employees who have reached a settlement with their employer via Labour Relations Agency (LRA) conciliation.
- Individuals working under an illegal contract, eg a barman who is under the age of 18 years old or employees in receipt of untaxed monies.
- Employees covered by a dismissal procedure agreement that has been exempted from the unfair dismissal provisions by legislation. This is a rarely exercised legal provision.
- Employees taking part in unofficial industrial action (unless the dismissal is for certain specified reasons, eg taking family leave or making a protected disclosure). For more information, see the page in this guide on dismissals relating to industrial action.
- The police (although police staff may make unfair dismissal claims where the dismissal relates to health and safety or the making of a protected disclosure).
- Those employed as a master - or as a member of the crew - of a fishing vessel where the individual is paid only by a share in the profits or gross earnings of the vessel.
- Employees who have reached a settlement with their employer via a 'compromise agreement'. This is an agreement reached, with the benefit of a relevant independent advisor who has professional indemnity insurance, in which the employee waives their right to make a complaint in relation to the dispute to which the settlement relates. This means that the agreement must specify the legal basis for the dispute - it cannot state that it covers all the possible employment-related claims.
Exemption from the unfair dismissal provisions
The parties to a dismissal-procedures agreement can apply jointly to the Department for the Economy to substitute provisions of the unfair dismissal legislation. Such substitution may be allowed if all the following points are satisfied:
- every trade union which is a party to the agreement is independent
- the agreement has a procedure to be followed if an employee claims to have been unfairly dismissed
- the procedure is non-discriminatory and available to all relevant employees
- the procedure gives employees a similar level of protection to that provided by the legislation
- the agreement includes provision either for arbitration in every case or allows arbitration in cases where a decision can't be reached or where a decision raises a question of law
- the agreement clearly defines which employees it applies to
Lay-offs and short-time working
You may temporarily lay off an employee or put them on short-time working, eg because of a downturn in work. This does not necessarily amount to a redundancy dismissal. You can only do this if the terms of their contract of employment allow it or by agreement with the employee. See Employers' Handbook Section 23: Lay-off and short time working (PDF, 33K).
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/unfair-dismissal-employee-eligibility
Links
Dismissals on capability grounds
How to dismiss an employee fairly when they are incapable of doing their job properly or commit some form of misconduct.
Sometimes an employee is incapable of doing their job to the required standard. This may be because they don't have the right skills or aptitude for the job.
They may also be capable of doing their job, but unwilling or reluctant to do it properly. In these particular circumstances, you would deal with the issue as one of misconduct and follow your company disciplinary procedures and the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures (if they apply). Otherwise capability is a separate dismissal category to misconduct. See dismissals on conduct grounds.
In most cases involving capability, you can help an employee improve by taking informal action, eg by offering training/mentoring or another suitable job (you would only redeploy to another suitable job if this is something that they agree to at this stage).
Capability dismissals: lack of skills/aptitude
To ensure that any resulting capability dismissal is fair when formal action is taken - you should:
- Inform the employee in writing of the performance issues that exist and invite them to a meeting to discuss these issues.
- Following the meeting, give an employee who is found to be performing unsatisfactorily a written note, as a summary and explanation ideally, setting out the performance problems identified at the meeting, the improvement that is required, a reasonable timescale for achieving this improvement, a review date and any identified measures of support you will provide to assist them to meet the required standards.
- Inform your employee that the note represents the first stage of a formal procedure and that failure to improve could lead to a final written warning and, ultimately, dismissal. You should keep a copy of the note and use it as the basis for monitoring and reviewing performance over the specified timescale - see managing staff performance. You should also inform the employee that they may appeal at any stage of the formal process.
- If there is a failure to improve in the timescale outlined, repeat the above procedure and issue a final written warning.
- If again there is a failure to improve within the timescale set out in the final written warning, this may result in dismissal.
- Finally, you should note that some exceptional acts of incapability can merit summary dismissal.
- Throughout the formal process, employees have the right to be accompanied to all meetings and appeal meetings and to appeal to a more senior manager - ideally one not involved in the initial meetings. To read more on the right to be accompanied, read the LRA Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-capability-grounds
Links
Dismissal due to illness
How to handle dismissing an employee due to long-term ill health.
Dismissal due to capability may also include instances where the employer dismisses because the employee is no longer capable of doing the job they were employed to do because of illness.
Occasionally an employee may have to leave your employment because of long-term ill health. Sometimes the employee will simply choose to resign. However, you might eventually have to consider dismissing them.
In order for a dismissal to be potentially fair, you must ensure that you regularly communicate and consult with the employee, take appropriate medical advice, consider the effects of the absence on the business, consider alternatives to dismissal and, if appropriate, take account of any reasonable adjustments as required under disability discrimination legislation. See employ and support people with disabilities.
Finally, before dismissing an employee you must also ensure you comply with the statutory dismissal procedures.
Prior to dismissal due to illness
Before dismissing an employee, you should consider as many ways as possible to help them back to work - dismissal is a last resort and could be unfair if not handled properly. It is also very important that you determine whether or not they are disabled under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
You can consider getting a medical report from their GP (with their written permission), or an occupational health assessment. Remember to ask the questions that are relevant to the job, as this will enable you to get the information you need to make an informed decision. The employee has the right to see the GP report before you and may choose not to disclose some information.
If their continued employment is no longer feasible because there are no reasonable adjustments that can be made, it may be fair for you to dismiss them.
During any dismissal procedure, you should treat all employees with sensitivity. You should also act fairly and reasonably. Your dismissal procedure must follow the statutory dismissal requirements.
If you unreasonably fail to follow the statutory dismissal procedures when dismissing and the employee is successful in unfair dismissal proceedings, any compensation awarded by the tribunal or arbitrator could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
If the employee who is subject to the procedure is disabled, you will also have to consider making any possible reasonable adjustments to allow for their needs; you have to address disability discrimination laws, so this is important.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissal-due-illness
Links
Dismissals relating to industrial action
How to ensure that you dismiss an employee fairly for reasons relating to industrial action.
It is automatically unfair to dismiss workers for taking part in official industrial action:
- In the 12-week period from the day the industrial action starts.
- That lasts longer than 12 weeks - but only if you haven't taken reasonable steps to resolve the dispute. Only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can decide whether or not you've taken the necessary steps to resolve the dispute.
Subject to some exceptions (see below), an employee dismissed while taking part in unofficial industrial action can't generally claim unfair dismissal.
For the difference between official and unofficial industrial action, see our guide on industrial disputes.
If you 'lock-out' employees taking industrial action, the days of the lock-out are not included in the calculation of the 12-week protected period. A lock-out is where you prevent employees from getting to their workplace, eg by locking the doors to the premises.
Apart from this - subject to some exceptions (see below) - an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can't hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while taking part in official industrial action as long as you have:
- dismissed all those who were taking part in the action on the same date that you dismissed the person complaining of unfair dismissal
- not offered re-engagement to any dismissed employee within three months of the dismissal date without making the person complaining of unfair dismissal a similar offer
Exceptions
The exceptions are that a tribunal/arbitrator can hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while taking part in industrial action - either official or unofficial - if the main reason:
- was that the employee took certain specified types of action on health and safety grounds
- related to maternity/paternity/adoption/parental/shared parental/parental bereavement leave, pregnancy or time off for a dependant
- was that the employee exercised their rights under the Working Time Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016
- related to the right to request flexible working arrangements
- was that the employee had been summoned or took time off work for jury service
- was that the employee took certain specified types of action as an employee representative or as a candidate to become one, or taking part in the election of such a representative
An industrial tribunal/arbitrator can also hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while participating in unofficial industrial action if the reason or main reason for the dismissal was that the employee made a protected disclosure.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-relating-industrial-action
Links
Dismissals on conduct grounds
How to dismiss employees involved in incidents of misconduct.
If you find that an employee has been involved in an incident of misconduct, the action you take depends on how serious it is. For example:
- If the misconduct relates to a minor issue, the penalty for a first offence would normally be a verbal warning. This would be followed by a written warning if the offence is repeated within a specified timescale. Further occurrences would result in a final written warning and ultimately dismissal if repeated again.
- If the misconduct relates to a more serious issue, the employer may issue a final written warning for a first offence followed by dismissal for any further repeat of the offence within a specified time scale.
- The Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice applies the statutory procedures to the issue of warnings as a matter of good practice.
- If the misconduct is of a very serious nature, the employer may dismiss for a first offence.
- No disciplinary action should be taken until there has been a thorough investigation into the alleged misconduct.
- Details of the alleged misconduct should be set out in writing and given to the employee prior to any hearing taking place.
- The employee must be offered the right to appeal against any decision taken within the formal procedure
- Throughout the formal process, employees have the right to be accompanied to all meetings and appeal meetings and to appeal to a more senior manager - ideally one not involved in the initial meetings
- The LRA Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures recommends that verbal warnings remain on file for a six-month period and written warnings for a 12-month period.
Discipline and dismissal have a statutory procedure which must be followed and if it is not, where it applies, this may result in a finding of automatic unfair dismissal.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-conduct-grounds
Links
Whistleblowing and dismissal
Protection from dismissal or detrimental treatment for workers who disclose a suspected relevant failure at work.
Workers who suspect wrongdoing and 'blow the whistle' to disclose these concerns to their employer are protected from dismissal or other negative consequences - as long as certain criteria are met. This law intends to help businesses quickly identify and resolve such problems.
The term 'workers' refers to those who work under:
- a contract of employment, eg employees
- some other contract to perform work personally, eg casual workers
It does not cover the genuinely self-employed.
The whistleblowing law also covers NHS practitioners, such as:
- GPs
- certain dentists
- pharmacists
- opticians
It also covers:
- agency workers
- certain categories of trainee
- those who contract to provide services to the Department of Health
- those who contract to provide services to a business via their own limited company - even if introduced via an employment agency or employment business
- student nurses and student midwives who undertake work experience as part of a course of education or training approved by, or under arrangements with, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC)
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-and-dismissal
Links
Whistleblowing: Qualifying disclosures
The types of disclosure that are eligible for protection from dismissal.
The types of disclosure that are eligible for protection are known as 'qualifying disclosures'.
These are where the worker reasonably believes that the disclosure is being made in the public interest and at least one 'relevant failure' is currently happening, took place in the past, or is likely to happen in the future.
Relevant failures can be:
- a criminal offence
- a miscarriage of justice
- damage to the environment
- the breach of a legal obligation
- a danger to the health or safety of any individual
- the deliberate covering up of information tending to show any of these matters
The same protection applies even if the qualifying disclosure concerns a relevant failure overseas or where the applicable law is not that of the UK.
Disclosures that can be characterised as being of a personal rather than public interest, will not be protected.
The belief does not need to be correct. The worker only needs to show that they held the belief and that it was a reasonable belief in the circumstances at the time they made the disclosure.
The disclosure is not a qualifying disclosure if:
- by making the disclosure, the worker has committed an offence, eg under the Official Secrets Act 1989
- the information should be protected from disclosure because of legal professional privilege, eg the disclosure has been made by a legal adviser (or their secretary) who has acquired the information in the course of providing legal advice
Qualifying disclosures made internally
A worker is protected if they make a qualifying disclosure to either:
- their employer - either directly or by using a procedure authorised by the employer for that purpose
- to another person who the worker reasonably believes to be solely or mainly responsible for the relevant failure
Ideally, you should have a whistleblowing policy that includes a procedure to follow if a worker wishes to make a qualifying disclosure.
Qualifying disclosures made externally
A worker is protected if they make a qualifying disclosure to an appropriate 'prescribed person'. These are certain statutory bodies - or people within them - who have the authority to receive disclosures relevant to the role of that particular body. Breaches in health and safety law, for example, can be brought to the attention of the Health and Safety Executive for Northern Ireland or the appropriate local council.
Public Interest Disclosure guidance.
For the disclosure to be protected, the worker must:
- reasonably believe the information and any allegation it contains are substantially true and are in the public interest to disclose
- reasonably believe they are making the disclosure to the relevant person or body
A qualifying disclosure is also a protected disclosure if it is made:
- to a government minister or a Northern Ireland Department Permanent Secretary by someone working in a government-appointed organisation - this could be directly or via departmental officials and in the public interest to disclose
- to a legal adviser in the course of obtaining legal advice - there are no further conditions attached
Other circumstances where an external disclosure is protected
A qualifying disclosure continues to be a protected disclosure if the conditions below are met.
Firstly, the worker must:
- not act for personal gain
- reasonably believe the information - and any allegation contained in it - is substantially true
In addition, one or more of the following conditions must be met:
- the worker must have previously disclosed the same information to their employer or to a prescribed person
- the worker reasonably believed they would be subjected to a detriment by their employer if the disclosure was made to the employer or a prescribed person
- in the absence of an appropriate prescribed person, the worker reasonably believed that disclosure to the employer would result in the destruction or concealment of information about the wrongdoing
Finally, it must be reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure. An industrial tribunal/arbitrator will decide whether the worker acted reasonably in all the circumstances, particularly taking into account:
- the seriousness of the relevant failure
- whether the relevant failure is continuing or likely to occur again
- whether the worker followed any internal procedures approved by the employer
- what action has, or might reasonably be expected to have, been taken where a previous disclosure was made to the employer or a prescribed person
- whether the disclosure breaches the employer's duty of confidentiality to others
- the identity of the person to whom the disclosure was made
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-qualifying-disclosures
Links
Whistleblowing: Exceptionally serious failures
How workers are protected when reporting an exceptionally serious failure in the workplace.
If the relevant failure is exceptionally serious, any qualifying disclosure made externally will be protected if the worker:
- does not act for personal gain
- reasonably believes the information disclosed, and any allegation contained in it, are substantially true
Also, it must be reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure in view of all the circumstances - with particular regard to the identity of the person to whom the disclosure is made.
Only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can decide whether or not the relevant failure is exceptionally serious. This will be a matter of fact and not simply a matter of the worker reasonably believing it to be exceptionally serious.
Raising a grievance and making protected disclosures
Employees do not necessarily have to raise a grievance in order to make a protected disclosure.
For more information about grievance procedures, see our guide on handling grievances.
There may be good reasons why a worker wishes their identity to remain confidential. The law does not compel an organisation to protect the confidentiality of a whistleblower. However, it is considered best practice to maintain that confidentiality, unless required by law to disclose it.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-exceptionally-serious-failures
Links
Whistleblowing: Right of complaint to an industrial tribunal
If an employee is dismissed for making a protected disclosure, they may bring a claim to an employment tribunal.
An employee may bring a claim for unfair dismissal if they are dismissed for making a protected disclosure. A tribunal/arbitrator will find any such dismissal to be automatically unfair.
An employee or other worker who believes they have been subjected to a detriment for making a protected disclosure can bring a complaint of detrimental treatment.
A worker subjected to a detriment by a co-worker in the course of that co-worker's employment with the employer, on the grounds that the worker made a protected disclosure, may be able to take a case to an Industrial Tribunal against both the co-worker and their employer.
A detriment can be either an act or a deliberate decision not to act by the employer. Whether an employee or other worker has suffered a detriment will be decided by the tribunal/arbitrator.
Examples of detrimental treatment include:
- threats of dismissal
- withholding a pay rise
- discrimination in promotion, transfer, or training opportunities
- failure to confer a benefit on a person who failed to accept an unlawful inducement that would have been conferred on them had they accepted the offer
Workers who are not employees cannot claim unfair dismissal. However, their dismissal could amount to a detriment and therefore they could still bring a detrimental treatment claim.
Remedies
Where a tribunal or arbitrator finds that an employee's complaint of unfair dismissal is justified, they will order either:
- reinstatement/re-employment
- the payment of compensation
Where an employee or other worker complains they have been subjected to a detriment and the tribunal or arbitrator finds the complaint well-founded, they will make a declaration to that effect and may order the payment of compensation.
An industrial tribunal will have the discretion to reduce a compensatory award by up to 25% in the event that it finds the disclosure has not been made in good faith.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-right-complaint-industrial-tribunal
Links
Types of employee dismissal
In this guide:
- Dismissing employees
- Types of employee dismissal
- Fair dismissal
- Unfair dismissal
- Unfair dismissal: employee eligibility
- Dismissals on capability grounds
- Dismissals relating to industrial action
- Dismissal due to illness
- Dismissals on conduct grounds
- Whistleblowing and dismissal
- Whistleblowing: Qualifying disclosures
- Whistleblowing: Exceptionally serious failures
- Whistleblowing: Right of complaint to an industrial tribunal
Types of employee dismissal
The different types of staff dismissal and unfair dismissal claims.
There are several types of staff dismissal:
- fair dismissal
- unfair dismissal
- constructive dismissal
- wrongful dismissal
Fair and unfair dismissal
A dismissal is fair or unfair depending on your reason or reasons for dismissal and whether you act reasonably during the dismissal process. Industrial tribunals/arbitrators follow previous legal decisions in deciding what is reasonable. What is unfair dismissal and what is fair dismissal?
Constructive dismissal
Constructive dismissal occurs where an employee resigns because you have substantially breached their employment contract, for example:
- cutting wages without agreement
- unlawfully demoting them
- allowing colleagues to subject them to harassment, bullying, victimisation, humiliation or discrimination
- unfairly increasing their workload
- changing the location of their workplace without contractual authority
- making them work in dangerous conditions
The breach of contract can result from either a single serious event or the last in a series of less serious events.
An individual may claim constructive unfair dismissal. A constructive dismissal is not necessarily an unfair one but it's hard for an employer to show that an action in breach of the contract was, in fact, fair.
Wrongful dismissal
Wrongful dismissal is where a contractual term is broken in the dismissal process, for example, dismissing an employee without giving them proper notice.
For further information see the Employers' Handbook Section 18: Disciplinary issues and dismissal (PDF, 95K).
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/types-employee-dismissal
Links
Fair dismissal
You must have a valid reason for dismissing an employee - understand the reasons that constitute a fair dismissal.
To dismiss an employee fairly, you must first have a fair reason for doing so. Potential reasons for fair dismissal include:
- conduct
- capability
- redundancy
- a statutory requirement which could prevent the employment continuing, such as a driver losing their driving licence
- some other substantial reason - any other potentially fair reasons fall into this category
An example of 'some other substantial reason' would be the dismissal of an employee who was taken on as a temporary replacement for an employee on maternity leave. For such a dismissal to be fair, you must have told the replacement employee at the beginning of their employment that the job was only temporary.
In order for any dismissal to be fair, you must also act reasonably and fairly during the dismissal procedure.
Acting reasonably
There is no statutory definition of 'reasonableness'. Reasonableness will be judged taking into account the employer's size and resources and will also consider whether the employer:
- raised and dealt with the issue promptly and consistently throughout the process
- genuinely believed that the reason for dismissal was a potentially fair one
- had reasonable grounds for that belief
- carried out proper and reasonable investigations where appropriate
- followed statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures
- informed the employee in writing why they were being considered for dismissal and listened to their views
- allowed the employee to be accompanied at disciplinary/dismissal hearings and appeals
- gave the employee the chance to appeal against the decision to dismiss
Reasonableness may also depend on whether the employee could be expected to understand the consequences of their behaviour.
Dismissal and disciplinary procedures
You must set out your dismissal and disciplinary rules and procedures in writing. Sample dismissal procedures (DOC, 14K).
There is a minimum statutory procedure that must be followed when you decide to dismiss an employee. Failure to follow this procedure may result in a finding of automatic unfair dismissal.
If you fail to follow the statutory procedure, where it applies, and the issue is subsequently heard by a tribunal, any compensation awarded to the employee could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
You should follow the good practice advice set out in the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance.
Additional advice, including sample procedures, can be found in the LRA guidance on advice on handling discipline and grievances at work.
Though tribunals/arbitrators do not have to take this booklet into account, it provides more detail and guidance which may be helpful.
Summary dismissals
Summary dismissal is the dismissal of an employee without notice or pay in lieu of notice - this occurs when they have committed an act of gross misconduct.
You should investigate the circumstances of the misconduct before dismissing the employee.
However, if you feel that you have no choice but to dismiss an employee, you must still follow statutory procedures.
Staff probationary periods
If you decide to dismiss an employee during their probationary period, you must follow at least the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedure.
Third-party pressure to dismiss an employee
If a customer or client threatens to withdraw their business unless you dismiss one of your employees, only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can determine whether or not such a dismissal is fair. Such dismissals are normally categorised as 'some other substantial reason'.
You cannot however take into account pressure exerted by a trade union by the calling or threatening of industrial action.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/fair-dismissal
Links
Unfair dismissal
Reasons that automatically constitute the unfair dismissal of an employee.
Even if you think you have dismissed an employee fairly, they could decide to bring an unfair dismissal claim because they believe that:
- the reason you gave for the dismissal wasn't the real one
- you dismissed them for an unfair reason - see unfair dismissal
- you acted unreasonably, eg by failing to give the employee plenty of warning in the run-up to taking the decision to dismiss them
How to fairly dismiss an employee fairly
If you think you may have to dismiss an employee, make sure that you:
- Have a fair reason for dismissal.
- Follow - at the very least - the statutory dismissal procedure. If you unreasonably fail to follow the statutory dismissal procedure and the issue is heard at tribunal, any compensation awarded to the employee could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
- Follow any contractual disciplinary/dismissal procedure you may have, as well as the guidance outlined in the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice on Discipline and Grievance Procedures. Your contractual procedure should comply with the code.
See fair dismissal.
Penalties for unfair dismissals
If an employee has been unfairly dismissed, the employer may be ordered to reinstate or reengage the employee. This however is an exceptional outcome.
Invariably, a tribunal or arbitrator will award compensation, made up of a basic award that depends on the employee's age, gross weekly pay, length of service, and a compensatory award.
They can also make an additional award if you fail to follow an order to reinstate or re-engage the employee.
Apart from in health and safety and whistleblowing cases, there is a limit on the amount which can be awarded for unfair dismissal. For the latest limits on awards, see our table of current tribunal and arbitration compensation limits.
The Labour Relations Agency Arbitration Scheme
The Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Arbitration Scheme provides an alternative to having a case heard by a tribunal to resolve an employment-related dispute (for example, claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract or discrimination, etc).
The scheme is quicker, confidential, non-legalistic, less formal, and more cost-effective than a tribunal hearing.
Under the scheme, an arbitrator's decision is binding as a matter of law and has the same effect as a tribunal.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/unfair-dismissal
Links
Unfair dismissal: employee eligibility
Employer consequences if you dismiss someone unfairly.
Employees can usually only claim unfair dismissal if they have worked for you for at least one year.
There are a number of reasons for dismissal that are automatically unfair. Most of these do not require the employee to have a minimum of one year's service, ie the employee will be able to claim unfair dismissal from day one of employment.
Who cannot complain to a tribunal about unfair dismissal?
The right to complain to a tribunal about unfair dismissal is also not available to:
- Self-employed people.
- Those who are not employees, eg casual workers, independent contractors or freelance agents.
- Members of the armed forces.
- Employees who have reached a settlement with their employer via Labour Relations Agency (LRA) conciliation.
- Individuals working under an illegal contract, eg a barman who is under the age of 18 years old or employees in receipt of untaxed monies.
- Employees covered by a dismissal procedure agreement that has been exempted from the unfair dismissal provisions by legislation. This is a rarely exercised legal provision.
- Employees taking part in unofficial industrial action (unless the dismissal is for certain specified reasons, eg taking family leave or making a protected disclosure). For more information, see the page in this guide on dismissals relating to industrial action.
- The police (although police staff may make unfair dismissal claims where the dismissal relates to health and safety or the making of a protected disclosure).
- Those employed as a master - or as a member of the crew - of a fishing vessel where the individual is paid only by a share in the profits or gross earnings of the vessel.
- Employees who have reached a settlement with their employer via a 'compromise agreement'. This is an agreement reached, with the benefit of a relevant independent advisor who has professional indemnity insurance, in which the employee waives their right to make a complaint in relation to the dispute to which the settlement relates. This means that the agreement must specify the legal basis for the dispute - it cannot state that it covers all the possible employment-related claims.
Exemption from the unfair dismissal provisions
The parties to a dismissal-procedures agreement can apply jointly to the Department for the Economy to substitute provisions of the unfair dismissal legislation. Such substitution may be allowed if all the following points are satisfied:
- every trade union which is a party to the agreement is independent
- the agreement has a procedure to be followed if an employee claims to have been unfairly dismissed
- the procedure is non-discriminatory and available to all relevant employees
- the procedure gives employees a similar level of protection to that provided by the legislation
- the agreement includes provision either for arbitration in every case or allows arbitration in cases where a decision can't be reached or where a decision raises a question of law
- the agreement clearly defines which employees it applies to
Lay-offs and short-time working
You may temporarily lay off an employee or put them on short-time working, eg because of a downturn in work. This does not necessarily amount to a redundancy dismissal. You can only do this if the terms of their contract of employment allow it or by agreement with the employee. See Employers' Handbook Section 23: Lay-off and short time working (PDF, 33K).
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/unfair-dismissal-employee-eligibility
Links
Dismissals on capability grounds
How to dismiss an employee fairly when they are incapable of doing their job properly or commit some form of misconduct.
Sometimes an employee is incapable of doing their job to the required standard. This may be because they don't have the right skills or aptitude for the job.
They may also be capable of doing their job, but unwilling or reluctant to do it properly. In these particular circumstances, you would deal with the issue as one of misconduct and follow your company disciplinary procedures and the statutory dismissal and disciplinary procedures (if they apply). Otherwise capability is a separate dismissal category to misconduct. See dismissals on conduct grounds.
In most cases involving capability, you can help an employee improve by taking informal action, eg by offering training/mentoring or another suitable job (you would only redeploy to another suitable job if this is something that they agree to at this stage).
Capability dismissals: lack of skills/aptitude
To ensure that any resulting capability dismissal is fair when formal action is taken - you should:
- Inform the employee in writing of the performance issues that exist and invite them to a meeting to discuss these issues.
- Following the meeting, give an employee who is found to be performing unsatisfactorily a written note, as a summary and explanation ideally, setting out the performance problems identified at the meeting, the improvement that is required, a reasonable timescale for achieving this improvement, a review date and any identified measures of support you will provide to assist them to meet the required standards.
- Inform your employee that the note represents the first stage of a formal procedure and that failure to improve could lead to a final written warning and, ultimately, dismissal. You should keep a copy of the note and use it as the basis for monitoring and reviewing performance over the specified timescale - see managing staff performance. You should also inform the employee that they may appeal at any stage of the formal process.
- If there is a failure to improve in the timescale outlined, repeat the above procedure and issue a final written warning.
- If again there is a failure to improve within the timescale set out in the final written warning, this may result in dismissal.
- Finally, you should note that some exceptional acts of incapability can merit summary dismissal.
- Throughout the formal process, employees have the right to be accompanied to all meetings and appeal meetings and to appeal to a more senior manager - ideally one not involved in the initial meetings. To read more on the right to be accompanied, read the LRA Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-capability-grounds
Links
Dismissal due to illness
How to handle dismissing an employee due to long-term ill health.
Dismissal due to capability may also include instances where the employer dismisses because the employee is no longer capable of doing the job they were employed to do because of illness.
Occasionally an employee may have to leave your employment because of long-term ill health. Sometimes the employee will simply choose to resign. However, you might eventually have to consider dismissing them.
In order for a dismissal to be potentially fair, you must ensure that you regularly communicate and consult with the employee, take appropriate medical advice, consider the effects of the absence on the business, consider alternatives to dismissal and, if appropriate, take account of any reasonable adjustments as required under disability discrimination legislation. See employ and support people with disabilities.
Finally, before dismissing an employee you must also ensure you comply with the statutory dismissal procedures.
Prior to dismissal due to illness
Before dismissing an employee, you should consider as many ways as possible to help them back to work - dismissal is a last resort and could be unfair if not handled properly. It is also very important that you determine whether or not they are disabled under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
You can consider getting a medical report from their GP (with their written permission), or an occupational health assessment. Remember to ask the questions that are relevant to the job, as this will enable you to get the information you need to make an informed decision. The employee has the right to see the GP report before you and may choose not to disclose some information.
If their continued employment is no longer feasible because there are no reasonable adjustments that can be made, it may be fair for you to dismiss them.
During any dismissal procedure, you should treat all employees with sensitivity. You should also act fairly and reasonably. Your dismissal procedure must follow the statutory dismissal requirements.
If you unreasonably fail to follow the statutory dismissal procedures when dismissing and the employee is successful in unfair dismissal proceedings, any compensation awarded by the tribunal or arbitrator could be increased by between 10% and 50%.
If the employee who is subject to the procedure is disabled, you will also have to consider making any possible reasonable adjustments to allow for their needs; you have to address disability discrimination laws, so this is important.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissal-due-illness
Links
Dismissals relating to industrial action
How to ensure that you dismiss an employee fairly for reasons relating to industrial action.
It is automatically unfair to dismiss workers for taking part in official industrial action:
- In the 12-week period from the day the industrial action starts.
- That lasts longer than 12 weeks - but only if you haven't taken reasonable steps to resolve the dispute. Only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can decide whether or not you've taken the necessary steps to resolve the dispute.
Subject to some exceptions (see below), an employee dismissed while taking part in unofficial industrial action can't generally claim unfair dismissal.
For the difference between official and unofficial industrial action, see our guide on industrial disputes.
If you 'lock-out' employees taking industrial action, the days of the lock-out are not included in the calculation of the 12-week protected period. A lock-out is where you prevent employees from getting to their workplace, eg by locking the doors to the premises.
Apart from this - subject to some exceptions (see below) - an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can't hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while taking part in official industrial action as long as you have:
- dismissed all those who were taking part in the action on the same date that you dismissed the person complaining of unfair dismissal
- not offered re-engagement to any dismissed employee within three months of the dismissal date without making the person complaining of unfair dismissal a similar offer
Exceptions
The exceptions are that a tribunal/arbitrator can hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while taking part in industrial action - either official or unofficial - if the main reason:
- was that the employee took certain specified types of action on health and safety grounds
- related to maternity/paternity/adoption/parental/shared parental/parental bereavement leave, pregnancy or time off for a dependant
- was that the employee exercised their rights under the Working Time Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016
- related to the right to request flexible working arrangements
- was that the employee had been summoned or took time off work for jury service
- was that the employee took certain specified types of action as an employee representative or as a candidate to become one, or taking part in the election of such a representative
An industrial tribunal/arbitrator can also hear a complaint of unfair dismissal from an employee dismissed while participating in unofficial industrial action if the reason or main reason for the dismissal was that the employee made a protected disclosure.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-relating-industrial-action
Links
Dismissals on conduct grounds
How to dismiss employees involved in incidents of misconduct.
If you find that an employee has been involved in an incident of misconduct, the action you take depends on how serious it is. For example:
- If the misconduct relates to a minor issue, the penalty for a first offence would normally be a verbal warning. This would be followed by a written warning if the offence is repeated within a specified timescale. Further occurrences would result in a final written warning and ultimately dismissal if repeated again.
- If the misconduct relates to a more serious issue, the employer may issue a final written warning for a first offence followed by dismissal for any further repeat of the offence within a specified time scale.
- The Labour Relations Agency (LRA) Code of Practice applies the statutory procedures to the issue of warnings as a matter of good practice.
- If the misconduct is of a very serious nature, the employer may dismiss for a first offence.
- No disciplinary action should be taken until there has been a thorough investigation into the alleged misconduct.
- Details of the alleged misconduct should be set out in writing and given to the employee prior to any hearing taking place.
- The employee must be offered the right to appeal against any decision taken within the formal procedure
- Throughout the formal process, employees have the right to be accompanied to all meetings and appeal meetings and to appeal to a more senior manager - ideally one not involved in the initial meetings
- The LRA Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures recommends that verbal warnings remain on file for a six-month period and written warnings for a 12-month period.
Discipline and dismissal have a statutory procedure which must be followed and if it is not, where it applies, this may result in a finding of automatic unfair dismissal.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dismissals-conduct-grounds
Links
Whistleblowing and dismissal
Protection from dismissal or detrimental treatment for workers who disclose a suspected relevant failure at work.
Workers who suspect wrongdoing and 'blow the whistle' to disclose these concerns to their employer are protected from dismissal or other negative consequences - as long as certain criteria are met. This law intends to help businesses quickly identify and resolve such problems.
The term 'workers' refers to those who work under:
- a contract of employment, eg employees
- some other contract to perform work personally, eg casual workers
It does not cover the genuinely self-employed.
The whistleblowing law also covers NHS practitioners, such as:
- GPs
- certain dentists
- pharmacists
- opticians
It also covers:
- agency workers
- certain categories of trainee
- those who contract to provide services to the Department of Health
- those who contract to provide services to a business via their own limited company - even if introduced via an employment agency or employment business
- student nurses and student midwives who undertake work experience as part of a course of education or training approved by, or under arrangements with, the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC)
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-and-dismissal
Links
Whistleblowing: Qualifying disclosures
The types of disclosure that are eligible for protection from dismissal.
The types of disclosure that are eligible for protection are known as 'qualifying disclosures'.
These are where the worker reasonably believes that the disclosure is being made in the public interest and at least one 'relevant failure' is currently happening, took place in the past, or is likely to happen in the future.
Relevant failures can be:
- a criminal offence
- a miscarriage of justice
- damage to the environment
- the breach of a legal obligation
- a danger to the health or safety of any individual
- the deliberate covering up of information tending to show any of these matters
The same protection applies even if the qualifying disclosure concerns a relevant failure overseas or where the applicable law is not that of the UK.
Disclosures that can be characterised as being of a personal rather than public interest, will not be protected.
The belief does not need to be correct. The worker only needs to show that they held the belief and that it was a reasonable belief in the circumstances at the time they made the disclosure.
The disclosure is not a qualifying disclosure if:
- by making the disclosure, the worker has committed an offence, eg under the Official Secrets Act 1989
- the information should be protected from disclosure because of legal professional privilege, eg the disclosure has been made by a legal adviser (or their secretary) who has acquired the information in the course of providing legal advice
Qualifying disclosures made internally
A worker is protected if they make a qualifying disclosure to either:
- their employer - either directly or by using a procedure authorised by the employer for that purpose
- to another person who the worker reasonably believes to be solely or mainly responsible for the relevant failure
Ideally, you should have a whistleblowing policy that includes a procedure to follow if a worker wishes to make a qualifying disclosure.
Qualifying disclosures made externally
A worker is protected if they make a qualifying disclosure to an appropriate 'prescribed person'. These are certain statutory bodies - or people within them - who have the authority to receive disclosures relevant to the role of that particular body. Breaches in health and safety law, for example, can be brought to the attention of the Health and Safety Executive for Northern Ireland or the appropriate local council.
Public Interest Disclosure guidance.
For the disclosure to be protected, the worker must:
- reasonably believe the information and any allegation it contains are substantially true and are in the public interest to disclose
- reasonably believe they are making the disclosure to the relevant person or body
A qualifying disclosure is also a protected disclosure if it is made:
- to a government minister or a Northern Ireland Department Permanent Secretary by someone working in a government-appointed organisation - this could be directly or via departmental officials and in the public interest to disclose
- to a legal adviser in the course of obtaining legal advice - there are no further conditions attached
Other circumstances where an external disclosure is protected
A qualifying disclosure continues to be a protected disclosure if the conditions below are met.
Firstly, the worker must:
- not act for personal gain
- reasonably believe the information - and any allegation contained in it - is substantially true
In addition, one or more of the following conditions must be met:
- the worker must have previously disclosed the same information to their employer or to a prescribed person
- the worker reasonably believed they would be subjected to a detriment by their employer if the disclosure was made to the employer or a prescribed person
- in the absence of an appropriate prescribed person, the worker reasonably believed that disclosure to the employer would result in the destruction or concealment of information about the wrongdoing
Finally, it must be reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure. An industrial tribunal/arbitrator will decide whether the worker acted reasonably in all the circumstances, particularly taking into account:
- the seriousness of the relevant failure
- whether the relevant failure is continuing or likely to occur again
- whether the worker followed any internal procedures approved by the employer
- what action has, or might reasonably be expected to have, been taken where a previous disclosure was made to the employer or a prescribed person
- whether the disclosure breaches the employer's duty of confidentiality to others
- the identity of the person to whom the disclosure was made
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-qualifying-disclosures
Links
Whistleblowing: Exceptionally serious failures
How workers are protected when reporting an exceptionally serious failure in the workplace.
If the relevant failure is exceptionally serious, any qualifying disclosure made externally will be protected if the worker:
- does not act for personal gain
- reasonably believes the information disclosed, and any allegation contained in it, are substantially true
Also, it must be reasonable for the worker to make the disclosure in view of all the circumstances - with particular regard to the identity of the person to whom the disclosure is made.
Only an industrial tribunal/arbitrator can decide whether or not the relevant failure is exceptionally serious. This will be a matter of fact and not simply a matter of the worker reasonably believing it to be exceptionally serious.
Raising a grievance and making protected disclosures
Employees do not necessarily have to raise a grievance in order to make a protected disclosure.
For more information about grievance procedures, see our guide on handling grievances.
There may be good reasons why a worker wishes their identity to remain confidential. The law does not compel an organisation to protect the confidentiality of a whistleblower. However, it is considered best practice to maintain that confidentiality, unless required by law to disclose it.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-exceptionally-serious-failures
Links
Whistleblowing: Right of complaint to an industrial tribunal
If an employee is dismissed for making a protected disclosure, they may bring a claim to an employment tribunal.
An employee may bring a claim for unfair dismissal if they are dismissed for making a protected disclosure. A tribunal/arbitrator will find any such dismissal to be automatically unfair.
An employee or other worker who believes they have been subjected to a detriment for making a protected disclosure can bring a complaint of detrimental treatment.
A worker subjected to a detriment by a co-worker in the course of that co-worker's employment with the employer, on the grounds that the worker made a protected disclosure, may be able to take a case to an Industrial Tribunal against both the co-worker and their employer.
A detriment can be either an act or a deliberate decision not to act by the employer. Whether an employee or other worker has suffered a detriment will be decided by the tribunal/arbitrator.
Examples of detrimental treatment include:
- threats of dismissal
- withholding a pay rise
- discrimination in promotion, transfer, or training opportunities
- failure to confer a benefit on a person who failed to accept an unlawful inducement that would have been conferred on them had they accepted the offer
Workers who are not employees cannot claim unfair dismissal. However, their dismissal could amount to a detriment and therefore they could still bring a detrimental treatment claim.
Remedies
Where a tribunal or arbitrator finds that an employee's complaint of unfair dismissal is justified, they will order either:
- reinstatement/re-employment
- the payment of compensation
Where an employee or other worker complains they have been subjected to a detriment and the tribunal or arbitrator finds the complaint well-founded, they will make a declaration to that effect and may order the payment of compensation.
An industrial tribunal will have the discretion to reduce a compensatory award by up to 25% in the event that it finds the disclosure has not been made in good faith.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/whistleblowing-right-complaint-industrial-tribunal
Links
Legal issues during industrial action
In this guide:
- Industrial disputes
- Avoiding disputes with your workforce
- Dealing with industrial disputes
- Statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action
- Lawful industrial action
- Legal issues during industrial action
- Legal issues following industrial action
- Conducting negotiations to resolve disputes
- The legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity
- Conducting industrial action ballots
Avoiding disputes with your workforce
How open communication can help create a conflict-free working environment and prevent disputes from arising.
Good relations between you and your staff are key to creating a productive working environment. You should, therefore, seek to encourage a workplace culture that prevents conflicts from arising.
If you fail to do so, collective grievances could arise, which could, in turn, lead to workers making tribunal claims or calling for industrial action. See staff motivation.
Informing and consulting your workforce and their representatives
It is good practice to develop channels for informing and consulting your workforce and/or their representatives on employment matters and business developments. Indeed, in some cases, you are legally obliged to inform and consult them, eg about collective redundancy situations. See engaging with staff.
Depending on the size of the business, you could set up:
- voluntary recognition with a trade union for collective bargaining purposes
- regular consultations with a recognised trade union - an effective working relationship with union officials can pick up problems before they escalate
- a staff forum or joint working group to pass on information to, collect ideas from, and consult with workers
- an employee consultative body to discuss major issues as they arise
- team and group meetings and feedback sessions
Many employers, especially those which recognise trade unions, have written procedures in place to discuss collective grievances with representatives and other significant issues affecting all or part of the workforce. Procedures are important as they can help you to structure and address problems at an early stage.
If you already have such procedures, you should ensure you follow them effectively and consistently.
If you don't have such procedures, you could consider putting some together in consultation with workers and/or their representatives.
See managing conflict.
The role of Labour Relations Agency (LRA) in preventing disputes
The LRA is an independent statutory body whose role is to improve working life through better employment relations.
The LRA not only helps to resolve a dispute once it arises but also helps employers and workers (or their representatives) work together to prevent disputes from arising in the first place.
The LRA's Good Practice Facilitation and Advisory services are dedicated to preventing workplace disputes where a problem has arisen but has not yet developed into a serious dispute. It will facilitate and offer services such as - assisted bargaining, collaborative working, and joint problem-solving parties, with a view to helping to prevent a dispute by facilitating sustainable solutions that are acceptable to all parties. See LRA dispute resolution services.
The LRA also delivers training and runs briefings, seminars, webinars, and workshops aimed at helping organisations adopt or develop better employment relations practices. LRA good practice seminars.
Employment document toolkit
The LRA has a free online employment document toolkit, once employers are registered they can unlock our free core employment guides to help them build documents, policies, and procedures for their own organisation. Find out about the LRA's free employment document toolkit.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/avoiding-disputes-your-workforce
Links
Dealing with industrial disputes
Ways to resolve disputes with groups of workers through mediation, conciliation, and arbitration.
If a dispute arises, you should meet with representatives of your workers to resolve the problem as soon as possible. Where you have agreed on procedures to meet and discuss such matters with a recognised trade union or other representatives, these procedures should be followed.
The initial concerns of the meeting should be to:
- define the actual cause of the dispute
- clarify who speaks for each side
- explore what options are available to resolve the dispute
In many cases, this meeting, or negotiations that follow it, will resolve the dispute. However, if negotiations become deadlocked, it may be necessary to call in outside help, possibly from the Labour Relations Agency (LRA). Its services are free.
LRA collective conciliation
Collective conciliation is a voluntary process where the LRA conciliators attempt to help employers and employees (normally via trade unions) discuss their differences and reach mutually acceptable settlements of their collective disputes. Outcomes are not imposed or judgements made on the rights and wrongs of the matter in dispute.
The main issues referred for collective conciliation include annual pay reviews; other terms and conditions eg shift hours, bonuses, changes in working practices, redundancy selection; and trade union recognition. Collective conciliation is normally only appropriate when the parties have exhausted their own internal procedures, or they agree it's required.
LRA collective conciliation explained.
LRA mediation service
The mediation service focuses on restoring productive working relationships between individuals and/or groups where those have broken down. Mediation is delivered by the LRA in-house accredited workplace mediators. Mediation is especially suitable when the aim is to maintain the employment relationship. It is often most effective if used in the early stages of a dispute.
LRA arbitration service
The LRA offers the following arbitration services for industrial disputes:
- Industrial arbitrations - these are arranged by the LRA in accordance with its statutory powers under Article 84 of the Industrial Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1992. In accepting such arbitrations the Agency must be satisfied that any negotiating procedures have been exhausted or are unlikely to resolve the issue and that the dispute cannot be settled by conciliation. This service is provided to employers and unions and, in exceptional circumstances, to individual employees.
- Procedural arbitrations - these are where national or sectoral negotiating procedures provide for arbitration as the final stage in the procedures.
Industrial arbitration is also voluntary but the parties accept in advance to be bound by the arbitrator's resolution, made within agreed terms of reference for the arbitrator. The decision, however, is not legally binding (unlike the LRA Arbitration Scheme, which is legally binding).
The decision to go to arbitration may be ad-hoc or may be an agreed stage in the parties' dispute resolution procedure.
LRA Arbitration and Independent Appeals.
Failure to resolve a collective workplace dispute
If you fail to resolve a dispute with a group of workers and/or their representatives, they may consider taking industrial action.
However, in order for such action to be lawful, it must meet a number of conditions. See lawful industrial action.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dealing-industrial-disputes
Links
Statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action
The statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action.
A union or individual must meet certain statutory conditions when organising industrial action.
1. The need for there to be a trade dispute
A person or trade union who calls for, threatens to call for, or otherwise organises industrial action, has immunity from civil action for inducing a breach of contract or interfering with a contract's performance only if acting in contemplation or furtherance of a 'trade dispute'.
For there to be a trade dispute:
- there must be a dispute between workers and their own employer
- the dispute must be wholly or mainly about specified employment-related matters such as:
(a) terms and conditions of employment, or the physical conditions in which any workers are required to work
(b) engagement or non-engagement, or termination or suspension of employment or the duties of employment, of one or more workers
(c) allocation of work or the duties of employment as between workers or groups of workers
(d) matters of discipline
(e) the membership or non-membership of a trade union on the part of a worker
(f) facilities for officials of trade unions
(g) machinery for negotiation or consultation, and other procedures, relating to any of the foregoing matters, including the recognition by employers or employers' associations of the right of a trade union to represent workers in any such negotiation or consultation or in the carrying out of such procedures
The relevant definition does not cover disputes:
- between workers and an employer other than their own employer
- not wholly or mainly about specified employment-related matters like pay and conditions
- between groups of workers or between trade unions, ie where no employer is involved in the dispute
- between a trade union and an employer, where none of that employer's workforce is in dispute with that employer
- relating to matters occurring overseas - except where workers taking action in the UK in support of the dispute are likely to be affected by its outcome
2. The need to hold an industrial action ballot
If a trade union decides to call on its members to take - or continue to take - industrial action, it will have no immunity unless it first holds a properly conducted secret ballot.
See conducting industrial action ballots.
3. The need to provide a notice of official industrial action to the employer
The union organising the industrial action must ensure that the employer receives written notice from the union which:
- Reaches the employer after the union has taken steps to notify the employer of the result of the industrial action ballot, but no less than seven days before the day - or the first of the days - specified in the notice.
- Specifies whether the union intends the industrial action to be 'continuous' or 'discontinuous'. The notice must also give the date on which any of the affected employees will be called on to begin the action (if continuous) or the dates on which any of them will be called on to take part (if discontinuous). Industrial action is 'discontinuous' if it involves industrial action other than on all the days when it might be taken by those concerned. An indefinite strike would, therefore, be continuous. However, an overtime ban might be continuous or discontinuous, depending on whether the ban applied to overtime working on all the days on which overtime would otherwise be worked or to overtime working on only some of those days.
- Provides a list of the categories and workplaces of the employees who are going to take part in the industrial action (the 'affected employees'), figures on the numbers of affected employees in each category, figures on the numbers of affected employees at each workplace and the total numbers of affected employees. The union must also explain how it worked out the figures it provides.
- Is given by any officer, official, or committee of the union which is inducing - and is therefore responsible for - the industrial action.
Note that the lists and figures mentioned above do not need to be provided in full where all of the affected workers pay their union subscriptions by deduction from pay at source, ie through the so-called 'check off' system.
In such circumstances, the notice must contain either:
- those same lists, figures, and explanations as set out above
- information that will allow the employer readily to work out the total number of workers concerned, the categories of workers to which they belong, the number of workers concerned in each of those categories, the workplaces at which the workers concerned work, and the number of them at each of these workplaces
Where only some of the affected workers pay their union subscriptions by the check-off, the union's notice may include both types of information, ie the lists, figures, and explanations should be provided for those who do not pay their subscriptions through the check-off, while information relating to check-off payments may suffice for those who do.
The lists and figures or information supplied should be as accurate as is reasonably practicable in the light of the information in the union's possession at the time when it complied with this requirement of the law.
4. The action is not 'secondary action'
It is unlawful for a union or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise secondary industrial action.
Secondary action - which is sometimes referred to as 'sympathy' or 'solidarity' action - means industrial action by workers whose employer is not a party to the trade dispute to which the action relates.
For these purposes:
- where more than one employer is in dispute with its workers, the dispute between each employer and its workers is treated as a separate dispute
- industrial action which is 'primary' action - ie in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute between workers and their own employer - is not regarded as 'secondary' action simply because it has some effect on another dispute between workers and a different employer
- the calls on workers to breach, or interfere with the performance of contracts will not be regarded as calls to take secondary action if made in the course of attendance for the purpose of peaceful picketing as the law allows
Note that secondary action can be taken not only by those working under contracts of employment - eg employees - but also by someone working under any contract where they personally do work or perform services for another, eg an agency worker or freelancer. Therefore, such workers can also be at risk of taking unlawful secondary action.
5. The action is not to promote closed-shop practices or against non-union firms
It is unlawful for a union or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise industrial action to establish or maintain any sort of union closed-shop practice.
This means that statutory immunity is therefore not available where the reason, or one of the reasons, for the industrial action is either:
- that an employer employs, has employed, or might employ a person who is not a member of a trade union
- to pressurise an employer into discriminating against a person on the grounds of non-membership of a trade union
'Trade union' here can mean any trade union, a particular trade union, or one of a number of particular trade unions.
An employer is discriminating against a person who is not a union member if its conduct in relation to its workers is:
- more favourable to those workers who are members
- different for union members and non-members
In addition, there is no immunity for a relevant act - such as calling for, threatening to call for, or otherwise organising industrial action - which is either:
- designed to exert pressure on an employer to persuade it to impose union-labour-only or recognition requirements on contractors
- taken by the workers of one employer and interferes with the supply (whether or not under a contract) of goods or services by a second employer where the reason, or one of the reasons, for the action, is that the supplier of the goods or services does not recognise, negotiate or consult with trade unions or trade union officials
6. The action is not in support of an employee dismissed for taking part in unofficial industrial action
A union or other person has no immunity if they call for, threaten to call for, or organise industrial action where both:
- the reason, or one of the reasons, for that action is the fact or belief that an employer has dismissed any employee
- the employee has no right to complain of unfair dismissal because they were dismissed while taking part in 'unofficial' industrial action
For these purposes, an 'employer' in relation to an employee includes, in the case where the employment has ceased, the employer they used to work for.
An 'employee' for these purposes who was a member of a union (other than for purposes unconnected with their employment) when they began to take the industrial action and/or at the time they were dismissed will be regarded as having been dismissed while taking 'unofficial' industrial action if, at the time of their dismissal, the act of calling for, threatening to call for or otherwise organising the industrial action, was not the act of the union.
This was because either:
- it was done by a person for whose acts the union was not responsible in law
- although done by a person for whose acts the union was responsible in law, their act has been 'effectively repudiated' by the union's executive committee, president, or general secretary
However, where the relevant act has been so 'repudiated', the employee is not regarded as taking 'unofficial' industrial action until a full working day has passed since the day the repudiation took place.
A 'working day' for these purposes means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, Christmas Day, Good Friday, or a bank holiday as defined under the [1971 c. 80.] Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971.
An employee who was not a union member when they began to take the industrial action in the course of which they were dismissed, and/or when they were actually dismissed, will not be regarded as having been dismissed while taking 'unofficial' action unless, at the time of dismissal, there were others also taking the action who were members of a union that had not authorised or endorsed the action.
7. The action doesn't involve unlawful picketing
For picketing to be lawful and therefore maintain the statutory immunity of those organising the industrial action, certain conditions must be met.
See legal issues during industrial action.
Failure to gain statutory immunity
Where a union or individual fails to meet any or all of the conditions set out above, any resulting industrial action will not be covered by statutory immunity.
As a result, employers and others who are damaged - or likely to be damaged - by the action may take civil proceedings in the courts against the union/individual.
See the legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/statutory-conditions-immunity-when-organising-industrial-action
Links
Lawful industrial action
The need to meet certain conditions before a union or individual can lawfully call for industrial action.
When a worker takes industrial action, they will usually be in breach of their contract of employment or contract for services.
This means that if a trade union calls for, threatens to call for, or otherwise organises industrial action, it is - in practice - calling for the breach, or interference with the performance, of employment contracts.
They may also be interfering with the ability of the employer of those taking the industrial action, and of other employers, to fulfil commercial contracts.
It is unlawful in civil law to induce - or threaten to induce - people to break a contract or to interfere with the performance of a contract. This means that a trade union would face legal action and claims for damages for calling for industrial action.
Therefore, to allow trade unions or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise industrial action lawfully, the law expressly gives them immunity from legal actions under civil law.
However, to obtain this immunity, they must meet certain statutory conditions when organising industrial action. These conditions are that:
- the action is called by someone authorised to do so, as set out in the Trade Union rule book
- there needs to be a 'trade dispute'
- an industrial action ballot must be held
- a notice of industrial action must be provided to the employer
- the action is not 'secondary action'
- the action is not to promote closed-shop practices
- the action is not in support of an employee dismissed for taking unofficial industrial action
- the action is not to enforce trade union membership against non-union firms
- the action doesn't involve unlawful picketing
See statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/lawful-industrial-action
Links
Legal issues during industrial action
The rules for dismissal during industrial action or picketing, and pay for striking workers.
You need to be aware of your own and your workers' legal position during industrial action.
1. Picketing
When pickets try to persuade people not to go to work or not to deliver or collect goods, they may - in effect - be inducing them to break or interfere with the performance of their employment contracts.
They may also be interfering with the ability of the employers of those people to fulfil their commercial contracts.
Such inducement in the course of picketing is not itself lawful simply because the industrial action supported by the picketing is lawfully organised. For the picketing to be lawful, it must satisfy certain conditions laid down by the law.
These conditions include the following:
- that the picketing is at or near the pickets' own place of work
- that the purpose of the picketing is to peacefully obtain or communicate information, or to peacefully persuade a person to work or not to work
However, there are three exceptions to the rule that an inducement in the course of picketing has immunity only if it is done at or near the pickets' own place of work:
- a trade union official may accompany a member of their union whom they represent so long as the member is picketing at their own place of work
- a person - eg a mobile worker - who does not normally work at one particular place, or for whom it is impracticable to picket at their actual place of work, may picket at the premises of the employer for whom they work or from which the work is administered
- a person who is not in employment may picket at their former place of work in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute, but only if the termination of their employment gave rise to - or is connected with - the dispute in support of which they are picketing
Picketing that is not peaceful and, for example, leads to violent or abusive behaviour, intimidation, or obstruction of the highway, is likely to involve offences under the criminal law. The law gives no protection to people who commit such offences in the course of picketing and they may be arrested and prosecuted by the police.
The Department for the Economy's statutory code of practice on picketing recommends that pickets and their organisers should ensure that in general, the number of pickets does not exceed six at any entrance to a workplace.
Failure to observe the provisions of the code does not in itself render a union, or anyone else, liable to any legal proceedings. However, where proceedings are brought against a union, the provisions of the code are admissible in evidence and may be taken into account by a court if they appear relevant to any question before it.
2. Notifying the employer before industrial action resumes
Where continuous industrial action is suspended, eg for further negotiations between the employer and union, the union must normally give the employer further notice before resuming the action.
The exception to this requirement is where the union agrees with the employer that the industrial action will cease to be authorised or endorsed with effect from a date specified in the agreement but that it may be authorised or endorsed again on or after another date specified in the agreement and the union:
- ceases to authorise or endorse the action with effect from the specified date
- subsequently reauthorises or re-endorses the action from a date on or after the originally specified date or such later date as may be agreed with the employer
For this exception to apply, the resumed industrial action must be of the same kind as covered in the original notice. This condition will not be met if, for example, the later action is taken by different or additional descriptions of workers. In order to avoid misunderstanding, both parties should put an agreement in writing.
3. Dismissal for taking industrial action
The dismissal of any striking employee during the first 12 weeks of lawfully organised official industrial action - the 'protected period' - will be deemed unfair if your reason for doing so is because the employee took industrial action.
The dismissal will also be unfair if the employee is dismissed after the protected period, but has stopped taking part in the industrial action before the end of the period.
If you 'lock out' your workforce during the protected period, the lock-out days are not counted when calculating the 12-week period.
The dismissal will also be unfair if:
- the employee is dismissed after the protected period - but had not stopped taking part in the industrial action before the end of the period
- you had failed to take reasonable steps to resolve the dispute
A dismissal can therefore be fair after the protected period if you can show that you made genuine attempts to negotiate a settlement with the trade union - including the proper use of any joint dispute resolution procedure, and have not unreasonably refused requests for third party conciliation or mediation.
Unfair dismissal claims may also be brought if you discriminate between employees by:
- dismissing some of those taking part in the action, but not others
- offering re-engagement selectively to some employees but not others within three months of the dismissal
An employee dismissed while taking part in unofficial action can't generally claim unfair dismissal. This is regardless of whether the employer has discriminated between those taking such action by dismissing - or re-engaging - only some of them.
However, there are cases where an employee who is dismissed during the course of unofficial industrial action will still be able to make a claim for unfair dismissal if they allege that the employer dismissed them for another reason. Generally, these cases relate to family reasons, health and safety, employee representation, and whistleblowing.
See dismissing employees.
4. Pay during industrial action
Where workers take strike action, they are in breach of contract and usually lose their right to pay for the hours they did not work. This may depend on the terms of the employment contract and the nature of the industrial action which the worker has taken.
The situation is more complex when workers take action short of an all-out strike, eg refusing to carry out particular duties. You may refuse to accept this conduct as satisfactory. However, if you accept partial performance of duties, you can't refuse to pay the worker for the part of the job they've carried out.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-issues-during-industrial-action
Links
Legal issues following industrial action
Re-engaging employees after a strike.
An employer may re-engage an employee dismissed during official industrial action on whatever terms the employer chooses, provided it offers the same terms to all dismissed workers.
During the three months following dismissal, an employer cannot selectively re-engage some employees and not others.
However, after three months, the employer can offer to re-engage any of the employees dismissed.
Any week during which an employee takes part in a strike doesn't count towards their continuous employment. This means that a calculation of an employee's length of employment will not include those days on which the employee was on strike. This could be important if an employee later needs to rely on their total length of employment to claim certain rights, eg statutory redundancy pay or unfair dismissal. See continuous employment and employee rights.
However, taking part in a strike won't break an employee's continuity of employment. This means that the terms and conditions of their employment contract won't be discontinued during the strike and then restarted afterward, but will effectively continue during the strike action.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-issues-following-industrial-action
Links
Conducting negotiations to resolve disputes
The importance of effective negotiating styles and skills when dealing with disputes.
Unless you have internal expertise, you may need external specialist negotiators to resolve some disputes.
Who should conduct the negotiations?
In most disputes, negotiating with your workers or their representatives face-to-face will be the quickest, cheapest, and easiest way of sorting out the problem. Both parties to the dispute will know what the issues are and can look for solutions that fit your needs.
Where written procedures exist, they will usually specify who should undertake the negotiations at the various stages and how they should be conducted. Such procedures will be the norm where trade unions are recognised.
In larger, more complex disputes, it may be better to enlist trained people to help with the negotiations.
Trade unions can supply their full-time officers to act as negotiators for their members. Employers' organisations and some firms of solicitors or other professional advisers can supply negotiators to employers. See choose a solicitor for your business.
It might be more cost-effective to train particular staff in negotiating skills. Trade unions also provide such training to their workplace representatives.
The Labour Relations Agency can help facilitate negotiations through collective conciliation.
Negotiating styles
There are two main ways to approach negotiations, and which one is used can affect how fast a dispute is resolved.
The first is the positional win-lose approach. Each negotiator will start by making demands, then each will try to trade off demands against concessions at the best rate they can. All possibilities will be considered as each side will put all their demands as early as possible to get them into the bargain, but this can sometimes be acrimonious and it can lead to long negotiations as each demand is discussed in detail.
The second style employed by negotiators is the principled win-win approach. The two sides compare their overall objectives to find common areas of benefit that can be agreed upon. Often this can be achieved by looking beyond the initial demands to discover the underlying ones.
For instance, do you really want to cut your wages bill or are you actually trying to find a way to increase profitability? Do your workers really want shorter hours or are they looking for more family-friendly and flexible working patterns? The win-win approach is less confrontational but risks being seen as a compromise that may not be the best result for anyone.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/conducting-negotiations-resolve-disputes
Links
The legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity
How the law works when the statutory immunities do not apply, making any subsequent industrial action unlawful.
Where statutory immunity for organising industrial action has not been met, eg because a union or individual has failed to organise a proper secret ballot, employers and others (such as their customers and suppliers) who are damaged - or likely to be damaged - by the action may take civil proceedings in the courts against the union or individual.
However, the person wishing to bring civil proceedings must still show that:
- an unlawful, unprotected act has been done or is threatened
- they are party to a contract which will be - or has been - broken or interfered with by the unlawful act
- they are likely to suffer - or have suffered - loss as a result
In addition, an individual deprived of goods or services because of the unlawful organisation of industrial action can also bring proceedings to stop this happening.
However, for this purpose, the individual does not need to show that they are party to a contract, which will be - or has been - broken or interfered with by the unlawful act.
Who can be sued as a result of unlawful industrial action?
Civil proceedings will normally be taken against the trade union or individual organising the industrial action.
However, in the case of picketing, it may be possible to sue the individual pickets as well as those who organised the unlawful picketing. This is because the pickets are inducing interference with the performance of contracts.
Note that even if it's a union that is responsible for organising unlawful industrial action, this does not prevent legal proceedings from being brought against the individual organisers.
Trade union liability for inducing breach of contract
The law states the circumstances in which a trade union is to be held responsible for a relevant act, eg inducing - or threatening to induce - a breach or interference with the performance of a contract.
Where these circumstances apply, a union will be held responsible for a relevant act regardless of any term or condition to the contrary in its own rules, or in any other contractual provision or rule of law.
A union will be liable for any relevant act, which is done, authorised, or endorsed by:
- its executive committee
- its general secretary or president
- any person given power under the union's own rules to do so
- any other committee of the union or any official of the union
For these purposes:
- A 'committee of the union' is any group of persons constituted in accordance with the rules of the union.
- A relevant act will be taken to have been done, authorised, or endorsed by an official if it was done, authorised, or endorsed by a group of persons, or any member of a group, to which an official belonged at the relevant time if the group's purposes include organising or co-ordinating industrial action.
- An 'official' is any person who is an officer of the union or a branch or section of the union or any person who is elected or appointed in accordance with the union's rules to be a representative of its members. This includes any person elected or appointed who is an employee of the same employer as the members, or one or more of the members, they are elected to represent, eg a shop steward.
However, if a relevant act that is done (or authorised or endorsed) by such a committee or official is 'effectively repudiated' by the union's executive committee, general secretary, or president, the union will not be held liable.
In order to avoid liability in this way, the executive committee, president, or general secretary of the union must repudiate the act as soon as reasonably practicable after it has come to the knowledge of any of them, and the union must, without delay:
- give written notice of the repudiation to the committee or official in question
- do its best to give individual written notice of the fact and date of the repudiation to every member of the union who it has reason to believe is taking part - or might otherwise take part - in industrial action as a result of the act and give similar written notice to the employer of every such member
The written notice of repudiation given to the union's members must contain the following statement:
"Your union has repudiated the call (or calls) for industrial action to which this notice relates and will give no support to unofficial industrial action taken in response to it (or them). If you are dismissed while taking unofficial industrial action, you will have no right to complain of unfair dismissal."
However, even if it takes these steps, a union will not be considered to have 'effectively repudiated' an act if:
- the executive committee, president, or general secretary subsequently behaves in a way that is inconsistent with the repudiation
- at any time up to three months after the repudiation, a party to a commercial contract that has been, or maybe, interfered with by the relevant act, requests the union's executive committee, president, or general secretary to confirm that the act has been repudiated, and written confirmation is not then given
Remedies
Where statutory immunity does not apply, those party to contracts which are broken, or the performance of which is interfered with, by the organisation of - or a threat to organise - industrial action, may seek an injunction against the organisers from the courts.
A court may, after examining the circumstances, grant an injunction on an interim basis pending a full hearing of the case. However, the union or individual against whom the order is sought will have the legal right to be given a chance to put their case forward.
If an injunction is not obeyed, those who sought it can go back to court and ask to have those concerned declared in contempt of court.
Anyone found to be in contempt of court may face heavy fines or other penalties which the court may consider appropriate. For example, a union may be deprived of its assets through sequestration. This is where the funds are placed in the control of a person appointed by the court who may, in particular, pay any fines or legal costs arising from the court proceedings.
It is also possible to claim damages for losses suffered - which may, but need not, be preceded by an application for an injunction - if the basis of the proceedings is a claim that an act involved breach, or interference with the performance of contracts.
Note that there are upper limits on the amounts a court can award by way of damages in any proceedings against a trade union. These limits depend on the size of the union concerned.
Limits on awards for damages against a union organising unlawful industrial action
Number of trade union members Upper limit on award for damages Fewer than 5,000 £10,000 5,000 - 24,999 £50,000 25,000 - 99,999 £125,000 100,000 or more £250,000
Other unlawful acts during industrial action
Those who have organised lawful industrial action are only protected from legal action for a relevant act, eg inducing breaches, or interference with the performance of contracts.
As such, there is no immunity for strikers or their organisers who commit other civil wrongs or criminal offences.
For example:
- if strikers or their organisers commit a criminal offence, such as intentional damage to property, they are liable to be arrested and prosecuted by the police in the same way as anyone else who commits such an offence
- if strikers or their organisers commit an unlawful trespass, eg by entering premises without authority or by staging a 'sit-in', they are liable to be sued for that and any other unlawful acts involved just like any other members of the public who occupy premises unlawfully
Also, note that the union has immunity only if the sole ground of liability is a relevant act - such as inducing a breach of contract. If some other non-protected ground of liability exists, immunity will be lost.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-consequences-failing-gain-statutory-immunity
Links
Conducting industrial action ballots
How a union must conduct a ballot before it can call for official industrial action.
If the employer and the union have exhausted all other available means of resolving a dispute, the union may feel that there is no alternative but to call on its members to take industrial action.
However, for the industrial action to be lawful, it must meet certain conditions. One of these is that the union calling for the action must hold a properly conducted secret ballot.
For information on the other conditions, see lawful industrial action.
The law sets out certain requirements that the union must satisfy for the ballot to be legitimate. These requirements are set out below.
1. Independent scrutiny
For a ballot where more than 50 members have the right to vote, the union must appoint a qualified independent person as the scrutineer of the ballot. Information on who qualifies as a scrutineer is available from the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) - contact the LRA.
The total number of members with the right to vote can be an aggregate number of members from one - or more than one - workplace and where this is more than 50, scrutiny procedures must be followed.
A scrutineer must be, to the best belief of the union, independent of the union and able to carry out their duties competently.
The scrutineer's terms of appointment must include producing a report on the conduct of the ballot. They must produce the report as soon as reasonably practicable after the date of the ballot - and not later than four weeks after that date.
The union must provide a copy of the scrutineer's report to any union member who was entitled to vote in the ballot and any employer of such a member who requests one within six months of the date of the ballot.
The copy must be supplied as soon as reasonably practicable and free of charge - or on payment of a reasonable fee specified by the union. The scrutineer's report must say whether or not the ballot has been conducted fairly and lawfully.
See the Department for the Economy's code of practice on industrial action ballots and notice to employers for further information on scrutineers.
2. Sending employers notice of the ballot and a sample voting paper
The union must take such steps as are reasonably necessary to ensure that any employer of any union members who are entitled to vote receives certain information.
The union must send this information not later than the seventh day before the intended opening day of the ballot, ie the first day when a voting paper is sent to any person entitled to vote.
The notice must be in writing and must:
- state that the union intends to hold the ballot
- specify the date which the union reasonably believes will be the opening day of the ballot
- provide a list of the categories of employee to which the employees concerned belong, a list of the workplaces at which the employees concerned work, figures on the number of employees in each category, the number of employees at each workplace, the total number of employees concerned plus an explanation of how these figures were arrived at
Note that the lists and figures mentioned above do not need to be provided in full where the workers concerned pay their union subscriptions by deduction from pay at source, ie through the so-called 'check off' system.
In such circumstances, the notice must contain either:
- those same lists, figures, and explanations as set out above
- information that will allow the employer to easily work out the total number of employees concerned, the categories of employee to which they belong, the number of employees concerned in each of those categories, the workplaces at which the employees concerned work, and the number of them at each of these workplaces
The 'employees concerned' are those whom the union reasonably believes will be entitled to vote in the ballot.
Not later than the third day before the intended opening day of the ballot, the union must send the employer a sample of the voting paper (and any variants of it) which will be sent to the workers concerned.
The paper must:
- state the name of the independent scrutineer, where appropriate
- give the return address, and the date, it is to be returned by
- have a number, which is one of a series of consecutive numbers used to give a different number to each voting paper
- make it clear whether voters are being asked if they are prepared to take part in - or to continue to take part in - industrial action which consists of a strike, or industrial action short of a strike (which includes overtime bans and call-out bans)
- specify the person(s) and/or class(es) of person(s) who the union intends to have authority to make the first call for industrial action relating to the ballot, if the vote is in favour of industrial action
The paper must also contain the following statement: "If you take part in strike or other industrial action, you may be in breach of your contract of employment. However, if you are dismissed for taking part in a strike or other industrial action which is called officially and is otherwise lawful, the dismissal will be unfair if it takes place fewer than twelve weeks after you started taking part in the action, and depending on the circumstances may be unfair if it takes place later."
That statement must not be qualified or commented upon by anything else on the voting paper.
3. Timing of the ballot and related action
If members vote in favour of industrial action, the action must begin within four weeks of the date of the ballot.
However, a union may be allowed to make its first call for industrial action more than four weeks after the date of the ballot if either:
- the employer and union agree on an extension of up to a further four weeks, eg to continue with talks that are making progress
- an injunction granted by a court (or an undertaking given by the union to the court) prohibits the union from calling for industrial action during some part, or the whole, of the four weeks following the date of the ballot, and the injunction subsequently lapses or is set aside, or the union is released from its undertaking
In the latter case, a union may apply for a court order which, if granted, would provide that the period of the prohibition would not count towards the four-week period for which ballots are normally effective.
The union must apply to the court no more than eight weeks after the date of the ballot. In such cases, the ballot cannot be effective if a union's first call for industrial action is made more than 12 weeks after the date of the ballot.
If the court believes that the result of a ballot no longer represents the views of union members, or that something has happened or is likely to happen that would result in union members voting against taking, or continuing with, action if there were a fresh ballot, it may not make such an order.
Note that a union cannot gain statutory immunity merely by holding a properly conducted secret ballot after previously calling for industrial action without one.
4. Entitlement to vote
All those members whom the union - at the time of the ballot - reasonably believes will be induced by the union to take part in or continue with the industrial action, must be given the equal entitlement to vote. No one else may be given a vote - otherwise, the ballot will be invalid.
The union may choose whether or not to give a vote to 'overseas members', ie members other than merchant seamen and offshore workers who are outside Northern Ireland at the time of the ballot.
However, members who are in Great Britain throughout the voting period for an industrial action ballot and who will be called upon to take part in, or continue with the industrial action must be given entitlement to vote in the ballot if either:
- their place of work is in Northern Ireland and the ballot is of members at their place of work
- the industrial action to which the ballot relates will involve members in Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland and the ballot is a general one covering workplaces in both Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Members required to be given entitlement to vote by either of these requirements do not count as 'overseas members' for the purposes of the law on industrial action balloting.
The ballot will also be invalid if anyone denied entitlement to vote is subsequently called on to take part in the action by the union with the exception of union members who either:
- were not members at the time of the ballot
- were members at the time of the ballot but who it was not reasonable for the union to expect to be called upon to take action, eg because they changed jobs after the ballot
Where the members of a union with different workplaces are to be balloted, a separate ballot will be necessary for each workplace unless one of the conditions set out below is met. It will be unlawful for the union to organise industrial action at any such workplace where a majority of those voting in the ballot for that workplace have not voted 'Yes' in response to the relevant required question(s). If a worker works at or from a single set of premises, their workplace is those premises. If not, it is the premises with which their employment has the closest connection.
In summary, the conditions for holding a single ballot for more than one workplace are that:
- at each of the workplaces covered by the single ballot there is at least one member of the union affected by the dispute
- entitlement to vote in the single ballot is given and limited to all of a union's members who, according to the union's reasonable belief, are employed in a particular occupation or occupations by one employer or any of a number of employers with whom the union is in dispute
- entitlement to vote in the single ballot is given and limited to all of a union's members who are employed by a particular employer or any of a number of employers with whom the union is in dispute
It is possible for a union to hold more than one ballot on a dispute at a single workplace. If the conditions above are met, some or all of those ballots may also cover members in other workplaces.
5. Voting procedures
Voting must be made by the marking of a voting paper. The union should have sent the employer a sample of this at least three days before the start of the voting.
Those voting must be allowed to do so without interference from or constraint imposed by the union or any of its members, officials, or workers.
So far as is reasonably practicable, every member properly entitled to vote must be:
- able to vote in secret
- given a convenient opportunity to vote by post at no direct cost to themselves
- sent a voting paper by post to their home address or any other address which they have asked the union, in writing, to treat as their postal address
There is a limited exception to these rules for the balloting of union members who are merchant seamen and the union reasonably believes that they will be employed in a ship at sea (or outside Northern Ireland) at some time during the voting period and that it will be convenient for them to vote while on the ship or where the ship is.
The voting paper must ask whether or not the voter is prepared to take part in - or continue to take part in - either:
- a strike
- action short of a strike, eg, an overtime or call-out ban
While the question(s) may be framed in different ways, the voter must be able to answer either 'Yes' or 'No' to indicate whether they are willing to take part in - or continue with - the industrial action.
The voting paper must specify the person(s) or description of the person(s) who the union intends to have authority to call for industrial action to which the ballot relates if the vote is in favour of industrial action.
For this purpose, anyone so specified need not be authorised under the union's rules to call on members to take industrial action but must be among those for whose acts the union is responsible in law.
6. Majority support
Majority support must be obtained in response to the question(s) on the voting paper that is appropriate to the type of industrial action concerned, ie:
- in the case of a strike, majority support must be obtained in response to a question on the voting paper which asks if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) strike action
- in the case of action short of a strike, majority support must be obtained in response to a question on the voting paper which asks if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) action short of a strike
- if the action consists or may consist of a strike and other industrial action, majority support must be obtained for each type of action in response to separate questions on the voting paper asking if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) each type
Majority support means the majority of those who actually vote, not the majority of those entitled to vote.
7. Announcing ballot results
A union must, as soon as reasonably practicable after holding an industrial action ballot, take steps to inform all those entitled to vote, and their employer(s), of the number of:
- votes cast in the ballot
- spoiled voting papers
- individuals answering 'No' to the required question(s)
- individuals answering 'Yes' to the required question(s)
Where separate workplace ballots are required, these details must be notified separately to those entitled to vote at each workplace.
If overseas members of a trade union have been given entitlement to vote in an industrial action ballot, the detailed information about its result need not be sent to them. However, the information supplied to non-overseas members in accordance with the statutory requirements must give separate details relating to overseas and non-overseas members. For these purposes, members in Great Britain given entitlement to vote do not count as overseas members.
8. Consequences of a union's failure to meet balloting requirements
If a union fails to satisfy the statutory requirements relating to the ballot or to give employers notice of industrial action (apart from certain small accidental failures that are unlikely to affect the result), this failure will give grounds for proceedings against a union by:
- a customer
- an employer
- a supplier of an employer
- an individual member of the public claiming that an effect or likely effect of the industrial action would be to prevent or delay the supply of goods or services to them or to reduce the quality of goods or services supplied
With the exception of failures to comply with the requirements to give notice to employers, such failures will also give grounds for action by the union's members.
If a union fails only to provide the required notice of intent to ballot or the sample voting paper to a particular employer who should have received it, only that employer or any individual deprived of goods or services because of the industrial action can bring proceedings.
Failure to satisfy any other balloting requirements will expose the union to proceedings brought by others, eg by its own members.
9. Calls for industrial action from individuals unspecified on the voting paper
A ballot will not give a union statutory immunity from legal proceedings if industrial action is called by a person not specified or described on the voting paper.
Therefore, if someone calls for action other than a specified person and no call is made by a specified person, the union would be at risk of proceedings being brought against it unless it effectively repudiated the call.
10. Statutory code of practice on industrial action notices and ballots
The Department for the Economy's statutory code of practice for industrial ballots and notice to employers promotes good practice in the conduct of industrial action ballots arranged by a trade union and in the preparation of notices to employers.
Failure to observe the provisions of the code does not in itself render a union, or anyone else, liable to any legal proceedings. However, where proceedings are brought against a union, the provisions of the code are admissible in evidence and may be taken into account by a court if they appear relevant to any question before it.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/conducting-industrial-action-ballots
Links
Lawful industrial action
In this guide:
- Industrial disputes
- Avoiding disputes with your workforce
- Dealing with industrial disputes
- Statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action
- Lawful industrial action
- Legal issues during industrial action
- Legal issues following industrial action
- Conducting negotiations to resolve disputes
- The legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity
- Conducting industrial action ballots
Avoiding disputes with your workforce
How open communication can help create a conflict-free working environment and prevent disputes from arising.
Good relations between you and your staff are key to creating a productive working environment. You should, therefore, seek to encourage a workplace culture that prevents conflicts from arising.
If you fail to do so, collective grievances could arise, which could, in turn, lead to workers making tribunal claims or calling for industrial action. See staff motivation.
Informing and consulting your workforce and their representatives
It is good practice to develop channels for informing and consulting your workforce and/or their representatives on employment matters and business developments. Indeed, in some cases, you are legally obliged to inform and consult them, eg about collective redundancy situations. See engaging with staff.
Depending on the size of the business, you could set up:
- voluntary recognition with a trade union for collective bargaining purposes
- regular consultations with a recognised trade union - an effective working relationship with union officials can pick up problems before they escalate
- a staff forum or joint working group to pass on information to, collect ideas from, and consult with workers
- an employee consultative body to discuss major issues as they arise
- team and group meetings and feedback sessions
Many employers, especially those which recognise trade unions, have written procedures in place to discuss collective grievances with representatives and other significant issues affecting all or part of the workforce. Procedures are important as they can help you to structure and address problems at an early stage.
If you already have such procedures, you should ensure you follow them effectively and consistently.
If you don't have such procedures, you could consider putting some together in consultation with workers and/or their representatives.
See managing conflict.
The role of Labour Relations Agency (LRA) in preventing disputes
The LRA is an independent statutory body whose role is to improve working life through better employment relations.
The LRA not only helps to resolve a dispute once it arises but also helps employers and workers (or their representatives) work together to prevent disputes from arising in the first place.
The LRA's Good Practice Facilitation and Advisory services are dedicated to preventing workplace disputes where a problem has arisen but has not yet developed into a serious dispute. It will facilitate and offer services such as - assisted bargaining, collaborative working, and joint problem-solving parties, with a view to helping to prevent a dispute by facilitating sustainable solutions that are acceptable to all parties. See LRA dispute resolution services.
The LRA also delivers training and runs briefings, seminars, webinars, and workshops aimed at helping organisations adopt or develop better employment relations practices. LRA good practice seminars.
Employment document toolkit
The LRA has a free online employment document toolkit, once employers are registered they can unlock our free core employment guides to help them build documents, policies, and procedures for their own organisation. Find out about the LRA's free employment document toolkit.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/avoiding-disputes-your-workforce
Links
Dealing with industrial disputes
Ways to resolve disputes with groups of workers through mediation, conciliation, and arbitration.
If a dispute arises, you should meet with representatives of your workers to resolve the problem as soon as possible. Where you have agreed on procedures to meet and discuss such matters with a recognised trade union or other representatives, these procedures should be followed.
The initial concerns of the meeting should be to:
- define the actual cause of the dispute
- clarify who speaks for each side
- explore what options are available to resolve the dispute
In many cases, this meeting, or negotiations that follow it, will resolve the dispute. However, if negotiations become deadlocked, it may be necessary to call in outside help, possibly from the Labour Relations Agency (LRA). Its services are free.
LRA collective conciliation
Collective conciliation is a voluntary process where the LRA conciliators attempt to help employers and employees (normally via trade unions) discuss their differences and reach mutually acceptable settlements of their collective disputes. Outcomes are not imposed or judgements made on the rights and wrongs of the matter in dispute.
The main issues referred for collective conciliation include annual pay reviews; other terms and conditions eg shift hours, bonuses, changes in working practices, redundancy selection; and trade union recognition. Collective conciliation is normally only appropriate when the parties have exhausted their own internal procedures, or they agree it's required.
LRA collective conciliation explained.
LRA mediation service
The mediation service focuses on restoring productive working relationships between individuals and/or groups where those have broken down. Mediation is delivered by the LRA in-house accredited workplace mediators. Mediation is especially suitable when the aim is to maintain the employment relationship. It is often most effective if used in the early stages of a dispute.
LRA arbitration service
The LRA offers the following arbitration services for industrial disputes:
- Industrial arbitrations - these are arranged by the LRA in accordance with its statutory powers under Article 84 of the Industrial Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1992. In accepting such arbitrations the Agency must be satisfied that any negotiating procedures have been exhausted or are unlikely to resolve the issue and that the dispute cannot be settled by conciliation. This service is provided to employers and unions and, in exceptional circumstances, to individual employees.
- Procedural arbitrations - these are where national or sectoral negotiating procedures provide for arbitration as the final stage in the procedures.
Industrial arbitration is also voluntary but the parties accept in advance to be bound by the arbitrator's resolution, made within agreed terms of reference for the arbitrator. The decision, however, is not legally binding (unlike the LRA Arbitration Scheme, which is legally binding).
The decision to go to arbitration may be ad-hoc or may be an agreed stage in the parties' dispute resolution procedure.
LRA Arbitration and Independent Appeals.
Failure to resolve a collective workplace dispute
If you fail to resolve a dispute with a group of workers and/or their representatives, they may consider taking industrial action.
However, in order for such action to be lawful, it must meet a number of conditions. See lawful industrial action.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dealing-industrial-disputes
Links
Statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action
The statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action.
A union or individual must meet certain statutory conditions when organising industrial action.
1. The need for there to be a trade dispute
A person or trade union who calls for, threatens to call for, or otherwise organises industrial action, has immunity from civil action for inducing a breach of contract or interfering with a contract's performance only if acting in contemplation or furtherance of a 'trade dispute'.
For there to be a trade dispute:
- there must be a dispute between workers and their own employer
- the dispute must be wholly or mainly about specified employment-related matters such as:
(a) terms and conditions of employment, or the physical conditions in which any workers are required to work
(b) engagement or non-engagement, or termination or suspension of employment or the duties of employment, of one or more workers
(c) allocation of work or the duties of employment as between workers or groups of workers
(d) matters of discipline
(e) the membership or non-membership of a trade union on the part of a worker
(f) facilities for officials of trade unions
(g) machinery for negotiation or consultation, and other procedures, relating to any of the foregoing matters, including the recognition by employers or employers' associations of the right of a trade union to represent workers in any such negotiation or consultation or in the carrying out of such procedures
The relevant definition does not cover disputes:
- between workers and an employer other than their own employer
- not wholly or mainly about specified employment-related matters like pay and conditions
- between groups of workers or between trade unions, ie where no employer is involved in the dispute
- between a trade union and an employer, where none of that employer's workforce is in dispute with that employer
- relating to matters occurring overseas - except where workers taking action in the UK in support of the dispute are likely to be affected by its outcome
2. The need to hold an industrial action ballot
If a trade union decides to call on its members to take - or continue to take - industrial action, it will have no immunity unless it first holds a properly conducted secret ballot.
See conducting industrial action ballots.
3. The need to provide a notice of official industrial action to the employer
The union organising the industrial action must ensure that the employer receives written notice from the union which:
- Reaches the employer after the union has taken steps to notify the employer of the result of the industrial action ballot, but no less than seven days before the day - or the first of the days - specified in the notice.
- Specifies whether the union intends the industrial action to be 'continuous' or 'discontinuous'. The notice must also give the date on which any of the affected employees will be called on to begin the action (if continuous) or the dates on which any of them will be called on to take part (if discontinuous). Industrial action is 'discontinuous' if it involves industrial action other than on all the days when it might be taken by those concerned. An indefinite strike would, therefore, be continuous. However, an overtime ban might be continuous or discontinuous, depending on whether the ban applied to overtime working on all the days on which overtime would otherwise be worked or to overtime working on only some of those days.
- Provides a list of the categories and workplaces of the employees who are going to take part in the industrial action (the 'affected employees'), figures on the numbers of affected employees in each category, figures on the numbers of affected employees at each workplace and the total numbers of affected employees. The union must also explain how it worked out the figures it provides.
- Is given by any officer, official, or committee of the union which is inducing - and is therefore responsible for - the industrial action.
Note that the lists and figures mentioned above do not need to be provided in full where all of the affected workers pay their union subscriptions by deduction from pay at source, ie through the so-called 'check off' system.
In such circumstances, the notice must contain either:
- those same lists, figures, and explanations as set out above
- information that will allow the employer readily to work out the total number of workers concerned, the categories of workers to which they belong, the number of workers concerned in each of those categories, the workplaces at which the workers concerned work, and the number of them at each of these workplaces
Where only some of the affected workers pay their union subscriptions by the check-off, the union's notice may include both types of information, ie the lists, figures, and explanations should be provided for those who do not pay their subscriptions through the check-off, while information relating to check-off payments may suffice for those who do.
The lists and figures or information supplied should be as accurate as is reasonably practicable in the light of the information in the union's possession at the time when it complied with this requirement of the law.
4. The action is not 'secondary action'
It is unlawful for a union or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise secondary industrial action.
Secondary action - which is sometimes referred to as 'sympathy' or 'solidarity' action - means industrial action by workers whose employer is not a party to the trade dispute to which the action relates.
For these purposes:
- where more than one employer is in dispute with its workers, the dispute between each employer and its workers is treated as a separate dispute
- industrial action which is 'primary' action - ie in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute between workers and their own employer - is not regarded as 'secondary' action simply because it has some effect on another dispute between workers and a different employer
- the calls on workers to breach, or interfere with the performance of contracts will not be regarded as calls to take secondary action if made in the course of attendance for the purpose of peaceful picketing as the law allows
Note that secondary action can be taken not only by those working under contracts of employment - eg employees - but also by someone working under any contract where they personally do work or perform services for another, eg an agency worker or freelancer. Therefore, such workers can also be at risk of taking unlawful secondary action.
5. The action is not to promote closed-shop practices or against non-union firms
It is unlawful for a union or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise industrial action to establish or maintain any sort of union closed-shop practice.
This means that statutory immunity is therefore not available where the reason, or one of the reasons, for the industrial action is either:
- that an employer employs, has employed, or might employ a person who is not a member of a trade union
- to pressurise an employer into discriminating against a person on the grounds of non-membership of a trade union
'Trade union' here can mean any trade union, a particular trade union, or one of a number of particular trade unions.
An employer is discriminating against a person who is not a union member if its conduct in relation to its workers is:
- more favourable to those workers who are members
- different for union members and non-members
In addition, there is no immunity for a relevant act - such as calling for, threatening to call for, or otherwise organising industrial action - which is either:
- designed to exert pressure on an employer to persuade it to impose union-labour-only or recognition requirements on contractors
- taken by the workers of one employer and interferes with the supply (whether or not under a contract) of goods or services by a second employer where the reason, or one of the reasons, for the action, is that the supplier of the goods or services does not recognise, negotiate or consult with trade unions or trade union officials
6. The action is not in support of an employee dismissed for taking part in unofficial industrial action
A union or other person has no immunity if they call for, threaten to call for, or organise industrial action where both:
- the reason, or one of the reasons, for that action is the fact or belief that an employer has dismissed any employee
- the employee has no right to complain of unfair dismissal because they were dismissed while taking part in 'unofficial' industrial action
For these purposes, an 'employer' in relation to an employee includes, in the case where the employment has ceased, the employer they used to work for.
An 'employee' for these purposes who was a member of a union (other than for purposes unconnected with their employment) when they began to take the industrial action and/or at the time they were dismissed will be regarded as having been dismissed while taking 'unofficial' industrial action if, at the time of their dismissal, the act of calling for, threatening to call for or otherwise organising the industrial action, was not the act of the union.
This was because either:
- it was done by a person for whose acts the union was not responsible in law
- although done by a person for whose acts the union was responsible in law, their act has been 'effectively repudiated' by the union's executive committee, president, or general secretary
However, where the relevant act has been so 'repudiated', the employee is not regarded as taking 'unofficial' industrial action until a full working day has passed since the day the repudiation took place.
A 'working day' for these purposes means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, Christmas Day, Good Friday, or a bank holiday as defined under the [1971 c. 80.] Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971.
An employee who was not a union member when they began to take the industrial action in the course of which they were dismissed, and/or when they were actually dismissed, will not be regarded as having been dismissed while taking 'unofficial' action unless, at the time of dismissal, there were others also taking the action who were members of a union that had not authorised or endorsed the action.
7. The action doesn't involve unlawful picketing
For picketing to be lawful and therefore maintain the statutory immunity of those organising the industrial action, certain conditions must be met.
See legal issues during industrial action.
Failure to gain statutory immunity
Where a union or individual fails to meet any or all of the conditions set out above, any resulting industrial action will not be covered by statutory immunity.
As a result, employers and others who are damaged - or likely to be damaged - by the action may take civil proceedings in the courts against the union/individual.
See the legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/statutory-conditions-immunity-when-organising-industrial-action
Links
Lawful industrial action
The need to meet certain conditions before a union or individual can lawfully call for industrial action.
When a worker takes industrial action, they will usually be in breach of their contract of employment or contract for services.
This means that if a trade union calls for, threatens to call for, or otherwise organises industrial action, it is - in practice - calling for the breach, or interference with the performance, of employment contracts.
They may also be interfering with the ability of the employer of those taking the industrial action, and of other employers, to fulfil commercial contracts.
It is unlawful in civil law to induce - or threaten to induce - people to break a contract or to interfere with the performance of a contract. This means that a trade union would face legal action and claims for damages for calling for industrial action.
Therefore, to allow trade unions or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise industrial action lawfully, the law expressly gives them immunity from legal actions under civil law.
However, to obtain this immunity, they must meet certain statutory conditions when organising industrial action. These conditions are that:
- the action is called by someone authorised to do so, as set out in the Trade Union rule book
- there needs to be a 'trade dispute'
- an industrial action ballot must be held
- a notice of industrial action must be provided to the employer
- the action is not 'secondary action'
- the action is not to promote closed-shop practices
- the action is not in support of an employee dismissed for taking unofficial industrial action
- the action is not to enforce trade union membership against non-union firms
- the action doesn't involve unlawful picketing
See statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/lawful-industrial-action
Links
Legal issues during industrial action
The rules for dismissal during industrial action or picketing, and pay for striking workers.
You need to be aware of your own and your workers' legal position during industrial action.
1. Picketing
When pickets try to persuade people not to go to work or not to deliver or collect goods, they may - in effect - be inducing them to break or interfere with the performance of their employment contracts.
They may also be interfering with the ability of the employers of those people to fulfil their commercial contracts.
Such inducement in the course of picketing is not itself lawful simply because the industrial action supported by the picketing is lawfully organised. For the picketing to be lawful, it must satisfy certain conditions laid down by the law.
These conditions include the following:
- that the picketing is at or near the pickets' own place of work
- that the purpose of the picketing is to peacefully obtain or communicate information, or to peacefully persuade a person to work or not to work
However, there are three exceptions to the rule that an inducement in the course of picketing has immunity only if it is done at or near the pickets' own place of work:
- a trade union official may accompany a member of their union whom they represent so long as the member is picketing at their own place of work
- a person - eg a mobile worker - who does not normally work at one particular place, or for whom it is impracticable to picket at their actual place of work, may picket at the premises of the employer for whom they work or from which the work is administered
- a person who is not in employment may picket at their former place of work in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute, but only if the termination of their employment gave rise to - or is connected with - the dispute in support of which they are picketing
Picketing that is not peaceful and, for example, leads to violent or abusive behaviour, intimidation, or obstruction of the highway, is likely to involve offences under the criminal law. The law gives no protection to people who commit such offences in the course of picketing and they may be arrested and prosecuted by the police.
The Department for the Economy's statutory code of practice on picketing recommends that pickets and their organisers should ensure that in general, the number of pickets does not exceed six at any entrance to a workplace.
Failure to observe the provisions of the code does not in itself render a union, or anyone else, liable to any legal proceedings. However, where proceedings are brought against a union, the provisions of the code are admissible in evidence and may be taken into account by a court if they appear relevant to any question before it.
2. Notifying the employer before industrial action resumes
Where continuous industrial action is suspended, eg for further negotiations between the employer and union, the union must normally give the employer further notice before resuming the action.
The exception to this requirement is where the union agrees with the employer that the industrial action will cease to be authorised or endorsed with effect from a date specified in the agreement but that it may be authorised or endorsed again on or after another date specified in the agreement and the union:
- ceases to authorise or endorse the action with effect from the specified date
- subsequently reauthorises or re-endorses the action from a date on or after the originally specified date or such later date as may be agreed with the employer
For this exception to apply, the resumed industrial action must be of the same kind as covered in the original notice. This condition will not be met if, for example, the later action is taken by different or additional descriptions of workers. In order to avoid misunderstanding, both parties should put an agreement in writing.
3. Dismissal for taking industrial action
The dismissal of any striking employee during the first 12 weeks of lawfully organised official industrial action - the 'protected period' - will be deemed unfair if your reason for doing so is because the employee took industrial action.
The dismissal will also be unfair if the employee is dismissed after the protected period, but has stopped taking part in the industrial action before the end of the period.
If you 'lock out' your workforce during the protected period, the lock-out days are not counted when calculating the 12-week period.
The dismissal will also be unfair if:
- the employee is dismissed after the protected period - but had not stopped taking part in the industrial action before the end of the period
- you had failed to take reasonable steps to resolve the dispute
A dismissal can therefore be fair after the protected period if you can show that you made genuine attempts to negotiate a settlement with the trade union - including the proper use of any joint dispute resolution procedure, and have not unreasonably refused requests for third party conciliation or mediation.
Unfair dismissal claims may also be brought if you discriminate between employees by:
- dismissing some of those taking part in the action, but not others
- offering re-engagement selectively to some employees but not others within three months of the dismissal
An employee dismissed while taking part in unofficial action can't generally claim unfair dismissal. This is regardless of whether the employer has discriminated between those taking such action by dismissing - or re-engaging - only some of them.
However, there are cases where an employee who is dismissed during the course of unofficial industrial action will still be able to make a claim for unfair dismissal if they allege that the employer dismissed them for another reason. Generally, these cases relate to family reasons, health and safety, employee representation, and whistleblowing.
See dismissing employees.
4. Pay during industrial action
Where workers take strike action, they are in breach of contract and usually lose their right to pay for the hours they did not work. This may depend on the terms of the employment contract and the nature of the industrial action which the worker has taken.
The situation is more complex when workers take action short of an all-out strike, eg refusing to carry out particular duties. You may refuse to accept this conduct as satisfactory. However, if you accept partial performance of duties, you can't refuse to pay the worker for the part of the job they've carried out.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-issues-during-industrial-action
Links
Legal issues following industrial action
Re-engaging employees after a strike.
An employer may re-engage an employee dismissed during official industrial action on whatever terms the employer chooses, provided it offers the same terms to all dismissed workers.
During the three months following dismissal, an employer cannot selectively re-engage some employees and not others.
However, after three months, the employer can offer to re-engage any of the employees dismissed.
Any week during which an employee takes part in a strike doesn't count towards their continuous employment. This means that a calculation of an employee's length of employment will not include those days on which the employee was on strike. This could be important if an employee later needs to rely on their total length of employment to claim certain rights, eg statutory redundancy pay or unfair dismissal. See continuous employment and employee rights.
However, taking part in a strike won't break an employee's continuity of employment. This means that the terms and conditions of their employment contract won't be discontinued during the strike and then restarted afterward, but will effectively continue during the strike action.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-issues-following-industrial-action
Links
Conducting negotiations to resolve disputes
The importance of effective negotiating styles and skills when dealing with disputes.
Unless you have internal expertise, you may need external specialist negotiators to resolve some disputes.
Who should conduct the negotiations?
In most disputes, negotiating with your workers or their representatives face-to-face will be the quickest, cheapest, and easiest way of sorting out the problem. Both parties to the dispute will know what the issues are and can look for solutions that fit your needs.
Where written procedures exist, they will usually specify who should undertake the negotiations at the various stages and how they should be conducted. Such procedures will be the norm where trade unions are recognised.
In larger, more complex disputes, it may be better to enlist trained people to help with the negotiations.
Trade unions can supply their full-time officers to act as negotiators for their members. Employers' organisations and some firms of solicitors or other professional advisers can supply negotiators to employers. See choose a solicitor for your business.
It might be more cost-effective to train particular staff in negotiating skills. Trade unions also provide such training to their workplace representatives.
The Labour Relations Agency can help facilitate negotiations through collective conciliation.
Negotiating styles
There are two main ways to approach negotiations, and which one is used can affect how fast a dispute is resolved.
The first is the positional win-lose approach. Each negotiator will start by making demands, then each will try to trade off demands against concessions at the best rate they can. All possibilities will be considered as each side will put all their demands as early as possible to get them into the bargain, but this can sometimes be acrimonious and it can lead to long negotiations as each demand is discussed in detail.
The second style employed by negotiators is the principled win-win approach. The two sides compare their overall objectives to find common areas of benefit that can be agreed upon. Often this can be achieved by looking beyond the initial demands to discover the underlying ones.
For instance, do you really want to cut your wages bill or are you actually trying to find a way to increase profitability? Do your workers really want shorter hours or are they looking for more family-friendly and flexible working patterns? The win-win approach is less confrontational but risks being seen as a compromise that may not be the best result for anyone.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/conducting-negotiations-resolve-disputes
Links
The legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity
How the law works when the statutory immunities do not apply, making any subsequent industrial action unlawful.
Where statutory immunity for organising industrial action has not been met, eg because a union or individual has failed to organise a proper secret ballot, employers and others (such as their customers and suppliers) who are damaged - or likely to be damaged - by the action may take civil proceedings in the courts against the union or individual.
However, the person wishing to bring civil proceedings must still show that:
- an unlawful, unprotected act has been done or is threatened
- they are party to a contract which will be - or has been - broken or interfered with by the unlawful act
- they are likely to suffer - or have suffered - loss as a result
In addition, an individual deprived of goods or services because of the unlawful organisation of industrial action can also bring proceedings to stop this happening.
However, for this purpose, the individual does not need to show that they are party to a contract, which will be - or has been - broken or interfered with by the unlawful act.
Who can be sued as a result of unlawful industrial action?
Civil proceedings will normally be taken against the trade union or individual organising the industrial action.
However, in the case of picketing, it may be possible to sue the individual pickets as well as those who organised the unlawful picketing. This is because the pickets are inducing interference with the performance of contracts.
Note that even if it's a union that is responsible for organising unlawful industrial action, this does not prevent legal proceedings from being brought against the individual organisers.
Trade union liability for inducing breach of contract
The law states the circumstances in which a trade union is to be held responsible for a relevant act, eg inducing - or threatening to induce - a breach or interference with the performance of a contract.
Where these circumstances apply, a union will be held responsible for a relevant act regardless of any term or condition to the contrary in its own rules, or in any other contractual provision or rule of law.
A union will be liable for any relevant act, which is done, authorised, or endorsed by:
- its executive committee
- its general secretary or president
- any person given power under the union's own rules to do so
- any other committee of the union or any official of the union
For these purposes:
- A 'committee of the union' is any group of persons constituted in accordance with the rules of the union.
- A relevant act will be taken to have been done, authorised, or endorsed by an official if it was done, authorised, or endorsed by a group of persons, or any member of a group, to which an official belonged at the relevant time if the group's purposes include organising or co-ordinating industrial action.
- An 'official' is any person who is an officer of the union or a branch or section of the union or any person who is elected or appointed in accordance with the union's rules to be a representative of its members. This includes any person elected or appointed who is an employee of the same employer as the members, or one or more of the members, they are elected to represent, eg a shop steward.
However, if a relevant act that is done (or authorised or endorsed) by such a committee or official is 'effectively repudiated' by the union's executive committee, general secretary, or president, the union will not be held liable.
In order to avoid liability in this way, the executive committee, president, or general secretary of the union must repudiate the act as soon as reasonably practicable after it has come to the knowledge of any of them, and the union must, without delay:
- give written notice of the repudiation to the committee or official in question
- do its best to give individual written notice of the fact and date of the repudiation to every member of the union who it has reason to believe is taking part - or might otherwise take part - in industrial action as a result of the act and give similar written notice to the employer of every such member
The written notice of repudiation given to the union's members must contain the following statement:
"Your union has repudiated the call (or calls) for industrial action to which this notice relates and will give no support to unofficial industrial action taken in response to it (or them). If you are dismissed while taking unofficial industrial action, you will have no right to complain of unfair dismissal."
However, even if it takes these steps, a union will not be considered to have 'effectively repudiated' an act if:
- the executive committee, president, or general secretary subsequently behaves in a way that is inconsistent with the repudiation
- at any time up to three months after the repudiation, a party to a commercial contract that has been, or maybe, interfered with by the relevant act, requests the union's executive committee, president, or general secretary to confirm that the act has been repudiated, and written confirmation is not then given
Remedies
Where statutory immunity does not apply, those party to contracts which are broken, or the performance of which is interfered with, by the organisation of - or a threat to organise - industrial action, may seek an injunction against the organisers from the courts.
A court may, after examining the circumstances, grant an injunction on an interim basis pending a full hearing of the case. However, the union or individual against whom the order is sought will have the legal right to be given a chance to put their case forward.
If an injunction is not obeyed, those who sought it can go back to court and ask to have those concerned declared in contempt of court.
Anyone found to be in contempt of court may face heavy fines or other penalties which the court may consider appropriate. For example, a union may be deprived of its assets through sequestration. This is where the funds are placed in the control of a person appointed by the court who may, in particular, pay any fines or legal costs arising from the court proceedings.
It is also possible to claim damages for losses suffered - which may, but need not, be preceded by an application for an injunction - if the basis of the proceedings is a claim that an act involved breach, or interference with the performance of contracts.
Note that there are upper limits on the amounts a court can award by way of damages in any proceedings against a trade union. These limits depend on the size of the union concerned.
Limits on awards for damages against a union organising unlawful industrial action
Number of trade union members Upper limit on award for damages Fewer than 5,000 £10,000 5,000 - 24,999 £50,000 25,000 - 99,999 £125,000 100,000 or more £250,000
Other unlawful acts during industrial action
Those who have organised lawful industrial action are only protected from legal action for a relevant act, eg inducing breaches, or interference with the performance of contracts.
As such, there is no immunity for strikers or their organisers who commit other civil wrongs or criminal offences.
For example:
- if strikers or their organisers commit a criminal offence, such as intentional damage to property, they are liable to be arrested and prosecuted by the police in the same way as anyone else who commits such an offence
- if strikers or their organisers commit an unlawful trespass, eg by entering premises without authority or by staging a 'sit-in', they are liable to be sued for that and any other unlawful acts involved just like any other members of the public who occupy premises unlawfully
Also, note that the union has immunity only if the sole ground of liability is a relevant act - such as inducing a breach of contract. If some other non-protected ground of liability exists, immunity will be lost.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-consequences-failing-gain-statutory-immunity
Links
Conducting industrial action ballots
How a union must conduct a ballot before it can call for official industrial action.
If the employer and the union have exhausted all other available means of resolving a dispute, the union may feel that there is no alternative but to call on its members to take industrial action.
However, for the industrial action to be lawful, it must meet certain conditions. One of these is that the union calling for the action must hold a properly conducted secret ballot.
For information on the other conditions, see lawful industrial action.
The law sets out certain requirements that the union must satisfy for the ballot to be legitimate. These requirements are set out below.
1. Independent scrutiny
For a ballot where more than 50 members have the right to vote, the union must appoint a qualified independent person as the scrutineer of the ballot. Information on who qualifies as a scrutineer is available from the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) - contact the LRA.
The total number of members with the right to vote can be an aggregate number of members from one - or more than one - workplace and where this is more than 50, scrutiny procedures must be followed.
A scrutineer must be, to the best belief of the union, independent of the union and able to carry out their duties competently.
The scrutineer's terms of appointment must include producing a report on the conduct of the ballot. They must produce the report as soon as reasonably practicable after the date of the ballot - and not later than four weeks after that date.
The union must provide a copy of the scrutineer's report to any union member who was entitled to vote in the ballot and any employer of such a member who requests one within six months of the date of the ballot.
The copy must be supplied as soon as reasonably practicable and free of charge - or on payment of a reasonable fee specified by the union. The scrutineer's report must say whether or not the ballot has been conducted fairly and lawfully.
See the Department for the Economy's code of practice on industrial action ballots and notice to employers for further information on scrutineers.
2. Sending employers notice of the ballot and a sample voting paper
The union must take such steps as are reasonably necessary to ensure that any employer of any union members who are entitled to vote receives certain information.
The union must send this information not later than the seventh day before the intended opening day of the ballot, ie the first day when a voting paper is sent to any person entitled to vote.
The notice must be in writing and must:
- state that the union intends to hold the ballot
- specify the date which the union reasonably believes will be the opening day of the ballot
- provide a list of the categories of employee to which the employees concerned belong, a list of the workplaces at which the employees concerned work, figures on the number of employees in each category, the number of employees at each workplace, the total number of employees concerned plus an explanation of how these figures were arrived at
Note that the lists and figures mentioned above do not need to be provided in full where the workers concerned pay their union subscriptions by deduction from pay at source, ie through the so-called 'check off' system.
In such circumstances, the notice must contain either:
- those same lists, figures, and explanations as set out above
- information that will allow the employer to easily work out the total number of employees concerned, the categories of employee to which they belong, the number of employees concerned in each of those categories, the workplaces at which the employees concerned work, and the number of them at each of these workplaces
The 'employees concerned' are those whom the union reasonably believes will be entitled to vote in the ballot.
Not later than the third day before the intended opening day of the ballot, the union must send the employer a sample of the voting paper (and any variants of it) which will be sent to the workers concerned.
The paper must:
- state the name of the independent scrutineer, where appropriate
- give the return address, and the date, it is to be returned by
- have a number, which is one of a series of consecutive numbers used to give a different number to each voting paper
- make it clear whether voters are being asked if they are prepared to take part in - or to continue to take part in - industrial action which consists of a strike, or industrial action short of a strike (which includes overtime bans and call-out bans)
- specify the person(s) and/or class(es) of person(s) who the union intends to have authority to make the first call for industrial action relating to the ballot, if the vote is in favour of industrial action
The paper must also contain the following statement: "If you take part in strike or other industrial action, you may be in breach of your contract of employment. However, if you are dismissed for taking part in a strike or other industrial action which is called officially and is otherwise lawful, the dismissal will be unfair if it takes place fewer than twelve weeks after you started taking part in the action, and depending on the circumstances may be unfair if it takes place later."
That statement must not be qualified or commented upon by anything else on the voting paper.
3. Timing of the ballot and related action
If members vote in favour of industrial action, the action must begin within four weeks of the date of the ballot.
However, a union may be allowed to make its first call for industrial action more than four weeks after the date of the ballot if either:
- the employer and union agree on an extension of up to a further four weeks, eg to continue with talks that are making progress
- an injunction granted by a court (or an undertaking given by the union to the court) prohibits the union from calling for industrial action during some part, or the whole, of the four weeks following the date of the ballot, and the injunction subsequently lapses or is set aside, or the union is released from its undertaking
In the latter case, a union may apply for a court order which, if granted, would provide that the period of the prohibition would not count towards the four-week period for which ballots are normally effective.
The union must apply to the court no more than eight weeks after the date of the ballot. In such cases, the ballot cannot be effective if a union's first call for industrial action is made more than 12 weeks after the date of the ballot.
If the court believes that the result of a ballot no longer represents the views of union members, or that something has happened or is likely to happen that would result in union members voting against taking, or continuing with, action if there were a fresh ballot, it may not make such an order.
Note that a union cannot gain statutory immunity merely by holding a properly conducted secret ballot after previously calling for industrial action without one.
4. Entitlement to vote
All those members whom the union - at the time of the ballot - reasonably believes will be induced by the union to take part in or continue with the industrial action, must be given the equal entitlement to vote. No one else may be given a vote - otherwise, the ballot will be invalid.
The union may choose whether or not to give a vote to 'overseas members', ie members other than merchant seamen and offshore workers who are outside Northern Ireland at the time of the ballot.
However, members who are in Great Britain throughout the voting period for an industrial action ballot and who will be called upon to take part in, or continue with the industrial action must be given entitlement to vote in the ballot if either:
- their place of work is in Northern Ireland and the ballot is of members at their place of work
- the industrial action to which the ballot relates will involve members in Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland and the ballot is a general one covering workplaces in both Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Members required to be given entitlement to vote by either of these requirements do not count as 'overseas members' for the purposes of the law on industrial action balloting.
The ballot will also be invalid if anyone denied entitlement to vote is subsequently called on to take part in the action by the union with the exception of union members who either:
- were not members at the time of the ballot
- were members at the time of the ballot but who it was not reasonable for the union to expect to be called upon to take action, eg because they changed jobs after the ballot
Where the members of a union with different workplaces are to be balloted, a separate ballot will be necessary for each workplace unless one of the conditions set out below is met. It will be unlawful for the union to organise industrial action at any such workplace where a majority of those voting in the ballot for that workplace have not voted 'Yes' in response to the relevant required question(s). If a worker works at or from a single set of premises, their workplace is those premises. If not, it is the premises with which their employment has the closest connection.
In summary, the conditions for holding a single ballot for more than one workplace are that:
- at each of the workplaces covered by the single ballot there is at least one member of the union affected by the dispute
- entitlement to vote in the single ballot is given and limited to all of a union's members who, according to the union's reasonable belief, are employed in a particular occupation or occupations by one employer or any of a number of employers with whom the union is in dispute
- entitlement to vote in the single ballot is given and limited to all of a union's members who are employed by a particular employer or any of a number of employers with whom the union is in dispute
It is possible for a union to hold more than one ballot on a dispute at a single workplace. If the conditions above are met, some or all of those ballots may also cover members in other workplaces.
5. Voting procedures
Voting must be made by the marking of a voting paper. The union should have sent the employer a sample of this at least three days before the start of the voting.
Those voting must be allowed to do so without interference from or constraint imposed by the union or any of its members, officials, or workers.
So far as is reasonably practicable, every member properly entitled to vote must be:
- able to vote in secret
- given a convenient opportunity to vote by post at no direct cost to themselves
- sent a voting paper by post to their home address or any other address which they have asked the union, in writing, to treat as their postal address
There is a limited exception to these rules for the balloting of union members who are merchant seamen and the union reasonably believes that they will be employed in a ship at sea (or outside Northern Ireland) at some time during the voting period and that it will be convenient for them to vote while on the ship or where the ship is.
The voting paper must ask whether or not the voter is prepared to take part in - or continue to take part in - either:
- a strike
- action short of a strike, eg, an overtime or call-out ban
While the question(s) may be framed in different ways, the voter must be able to answer either 'Yes' or 'No' to indicate whether they are willing to take part in - or continue with - the industrial action.
The voting paper must specify the person(s) or description of the person(s) who the union intends to have authority to call for industrial action to which the ballot relates if the vote is in favour of industrial action.
For this purpose, anyone so specified need not be authorised under the union's rules to call on members to take industrial action but must be among those for whose acts the union is responsible in law.
6. Majority support
Majority support must be obtained in response to the question(s) on the voting paper that is appropriate to the type of industrial action concerned, ie:
- in the case of a strike, majority support must be obtained in response to a question on the voting paper which asks if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) strike action
- in the case of action short of a strike, majority support must be obtained in response to a question on the voting paper which asks if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) action short of a strike
- if the action consists or may consist of a strike and other industrial action, majority support must be obtained for each type of action in response to separate questions on the voting paper asking if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) each type
Majority support means the majority of those who actually vote, not the majority of those entitled to vote.
7. Announcing ballot results
A union must, as soon as reasonably practicable after holding an industrial action ballot, take steps to inform all those entitled to vote, and their employer(s), of the number of:
- votes cast in the ballot
- spoiled voting papers
- individuals answering 'No' to the required question(s)
- individuals answering 'Yes' to the required question(s)
Where separate workplace ballots are required, these details must be notified separately to those entitled to vote at each workplace.
If overseas members of a trade union have been given entitlement to vote in an industrial action ballot, the detailed information about its result need not be sent to them. However, the information supplied to non-overseas members in accordance with the statutory requirements must give separate details relating to overseas and non-overseas members. For these purposes, members in Great Britain given entitlement to vote do not count as overseas members.
8. Consequences of a union's failure to meet balloting requirements
If a union fails to satisfy the statutory requirements relating to the ballot or to give employers notice of industrial action (apart from certain small accidental failures that are unlikely to affect the result), this failure will give grounds for proceedings against a union by:
- a customer
- an employer
- a supplier of an employer
- an individual member of the public claiming that an effect or likely effect of the industrial action would be to prevent or delay the supply of goods or services to them or to reduce the quality of goods or services supplied
With the exception of failures to comply with the requirements to give notice to employers, such failures will also give grounds for action by the union's members.
If a union fails only to provide the required notice of intent to ballot or the sample voting paper to a particular employer who should have received it, only that employer or any individual deprived of goods or services because of the industrial action can bring proceedings.
Failure to satisfy any other balloting requirements will expose the union to proceedings brought by others, eg by its own members.
9. Calls for industrial action from individuals unspecified on the voting paper
A ballot will not give a union statutory immunity from legal proceedings if industrial action is called by a person not specified or described on the voting paper.
Therefore, if someone calls for action other than a specified person and no call is made by a specified person, the union would be at risk of proceedings being brought against it unless it effectively repudiated the call.
10. Statutory code of practice on industrial action notices and ballots
The Department for the Economy's statutory code of practice for industrial ballots and notice to employers promotes good practice in the conduct of industrial action ballots arranged by a trade union and in the preparation of notices to employers.
Failure to observe the provisions of the code does not in itself render a union, or anyone else, liable to any legal proceedings. However, where proceedings are brought against a union, the provisions of the code are admissible in evidence and may be taken into account by a court if they appear relevant to any question before it.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/conducting-industrial-action-ballots
Links
Conducting negotiations to resolve disputes
In this guide:
- Industrial disputes
- Avoiding disputes with your workforce
- Dealing with industrial disputes
- Statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action
- Lawful industrial action
- Legal issues during industrial action
- Legal issues following industrial action
- Conducting negotiations to resolve disputes
- The legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity
- Conducting industrial action ballots
Avoiding disputes with your workforce
How open communication can help create a conflict-free working environment and prevent disputes from arising.
Good relations between you and your staff are key to creating a productive working environment. You should, therefore, seek to encourage a workplace culture that prevents conflicts from arising.
If you fail to do so, collective grievances could arise, which could, in turn, lead to workers making tribunal claims or calling for industrial action. See staff motivation.
Informing and consulting your workforce and their representatives
It is good practice to develop channels for informing and consulting your workforce and/or their representatives on employment matters and business developments. Indeed, in some cases, you are legally obliged to inform and consult them, eg about collective redundancy situations. See engaging with staff.
Depending on the size of the business, you could set up:
- voluntary recognition with a trade union for collective bargaining purposes
- regular consultations with a recognised trade union - an effective working relationship with union officials can pick up problems before they escalate
- a staff forum or joint working group to pass on information to, collect ideas from, and consult with workers
- an employee consultative body to discuss major issues as they arise
- team and group meetings and feedback sessions
Many employers, especially those which recognise trade unions, have written procedures in place to discuss collective grievances with representatives and other significant issues affecting all or part of the workforce. Procedures are important as they can help you to structure and address problems at an early stage.
If you already have such procedures, you should ensure you follow them effectively and consistently.
If you don't have such procedures, you could consider putting some together in consultation with workers and/or their representatives.
See managing conflict.
The role of Labour Relations Agency (LRA) in preventing disputes
The LRA is an independent statutory body whose role is to improve working life through better employment relations.
The LRA not only helps to resolve a dispute once it arises but also helps employers and workers (or their representatives) work together to prevent disputes from arising in the first place.
The LRA's Good Practice Facilitation and Advisory services are dedicated to preventing workplace disputes where a problem has arisen but has not yet developed into a serious dispute. It will facilitate and offer services such as - assisted bargaining, collaborative working, and joint problem-solving parties, with a view to helping to prevent a dispute by facilitating sustainable solutions that are acceptable to all parties. See LRA dispute resolution services.
The LRA also delivers training and runs briefings, seminars, webinars, and workshops aimed at helping organisations adopt or develop better employment relations practices. LRA good practice seminars.
Employment document toolkit
The LRA has a free online employment document toolkit, once employers are registered they can unlock our free core employment guides to help them build documents, policies, and procedures for their own organisation. Find out about the LRA's free employment document toolkit.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/avoiding-disputes-your-workforce
Links
Dealing with industrial disputes
Ways to resolve disputes with groups of workers through mediation, conciliation, and arbitration.
If a dispute arises, you should meet with representatives of your workers to resolve the problem as soon as possible. Where you have agreed on procedures to meet and discuss such matters with a recognised trade union or other representatives, these procedures should be followed.
The initial concerns of the meeting should be to:
- define the actual cause of the dispute
- clarify who speaks for each side
- explore what options are available to resolve the dispute
In many cases, this meeting, or negotiations that follow it, will resolve the dispute. However, if negotiations become deadlocked, it may be necessary to call in outside help, possibly from the Labour Relations Agency (LRA). Its services are free.
LRA collective conciliation
Collective conciliation is a voluntary process where the LRA conciliators attempt to help employers and employees (normally via trade unions) discuss their differences and reach mutually acceptable settlements of their collective disputes. Outcomes are not imposed or judgements made on the rights and wrongs of the matter in dispute.
The main issues referred for collective conciliation include annual pay reviews; other terms and conditions eg shift hours, bonuses, changes in working practices, redundancy selection; and trade union recognition. Collective conciliation is normally only appropriate when the parties have exhausted their own internal procedures, or they agree it's required.
LRA collective conciliation explained.
LRA mediation service
The mediation service focuses on restoring productive working relationships between individuals and/or groups where those have broken down. Mediation is delivered by the LRA in-house accredited workplace mediators. Mediation is especially suitable when the aim is to maintain the employment relationship. It is often most effective if used in the early stages of a dispute.
LRA arbitration service
The LRA offers the following arbitration services for industrial disputes:
- Industrial arbitrations - these are arranged by the LRA in accordance with its statutory powers under Article 84 of the Industrial Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1992. In accepting such arbitrations the Agency must be satisfied that any negotiating procedures have been exhausted or are unlikely to resolve the issue and that the dispute cannot be settled by conciliation. This service is provided to employers and unions and, in exceptional circumstances, to individual employees.
- Procedural arbitrations - these are where national or sectoral negotiating procedures provide for arbitration as the final stage in the procedures.
Industrial arbitration is also voluntary but the parties accept in advance to be bound by the arbitrator's resolution, made within agreed terms of reference for the arbitrator. The decision, however, is not legally binding (unlike the LRA Arbitration Scheme, which is legally binding).
The decision to go to arbitration may be ad-hoc or may be an agreed stage in the parties' dispute resolution procedure.
LRA Arbitration and Independent Appeals.
Failure to resolve a collective workplace dispute
If you fail to resolve a dispute with a group of workers and/or their representatives, they may consider taking industrial action.
However, in order for such action to be lawful, it must meet a number of conditions. See lawful industrial action.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dealing-industrial-disputes
Links
Statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action
The statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action.
A union or individual must meet certain statutory conditions when organising industrial action.
1. The need for there to be a trade dispute
A person or trade union who calls for, threatens to call for, or otherwise organises industrial action, has immunity from civil action for inducing a breach of contract or interfering with a contract's performance only if acting in contemplation or furtherance of a 'trade dispute'.
For there to be a trade dispute:
- there must be a dispute between workers and their own employer
- the dispute must be wholly or mainly about specified employment-related matters such as:
(a) terms and conditions of employment, or the physical conditions in which any workers are required to work
(b) engagement or non-engagement, or termination or suspension of employment or the duties of employment, of one or more workers
(c) allocation of work or the duties of employment as between workers or groups of workers
(d) matters of discipline
(e) the membership or non-membership of a trade union on the part of a worker
(f) facilities for officials of trade unions
(g) machinery for negotiation or consultation, and other procedures, relating to any of the foregoing matters, including the recognition by employers or employers' associations of the right of a trade union to represent workers in any such negotiation or consultation or in the carrying out of such procedures
The relevant definition does not cover disputes:
- between workers and an employer other than their own employer
- not wholly or mainly about specified employment-related matters like pay and conditions
- between groups of workers or between trade unions, ie where no employer is involved in the dispute
- between a trade union and an employer, where none of that employer's workforce is in dispute with that employer
- relating to matters occurring overseas - except where workers taking action in the UK in support of the dispute are likely to be affected by its outcome
2. The need to hold an industrial action ballot
If a trade union decides to call on its members to take - or continue to take - industrial action, it will have no immunity unless it first holds a properly conducted secret ballot.
See conducting industrial action ballots.
3. The need to provide a notice of official industrial action to the employer
The union organising the industrial action must ensure that the employer receives written notice from the union which:
- Reaches the employer after the union has taken steps to notify the employer of the result of the industrial action ballot, but no less than seven days before the day - or the first of the days - specified in the notice.
- Specifies whether the union intends the industrial action to be 'continuous' or 'discontinuous'. The notice must also give the date on which any of the affected employees will be called on to begin the action (if continuous) or the dates on which any of them will be called on to take part (if discontinuous). Industrial action is 'discontinuous' if it involves industrial action other than on all the days when it might be taken by those concerned. An indefinite strike would, therefore, be continuous. However, an overtime ban might be continuous or discontinuous, depending on whether the ban applied to overtime working on all the days on which overtime would otherwise be worked or to overtime working on only some of those days.
- Provides a list of the categories and workplaces of the employees who are going to take part in the industrial action (the 'affected employees'), figures on the numbers of affected employees in each category, figures on the numbers of affected employees at each workplace and the total numbers of affected employees. The union must also explain how it worked out the figures it provides.
- Is given by any officer, official, or committee of the union which is inducing - and is therefore responsible for - the industrial action.
Note that the lists and figures mentioned above do not need to be provided in full where all of the affected workers pay their union subscriptions by deduction from pay at source, ie through the so-called 'check off' system.
In such circumstances, the notice must contain either:
- those same lists, figures, and explanations as set out above
- information that will allow the employer readily to work out the total number of workers concerned, the categories of workers to which they belong, the number of workers concerned in each of those categories, the workplaces at which the workers concerned work, and the number of them at each of these workplaces
Where only some of the affected workers pay their union subscriptions by the check-off, the union's notice may include both types of information, ie the lists, figures, and explanations should be provided for those who do not pay their subscriptions through the check-off, while information relating to check-off payments may suffice for those who do.
The lists and figures or information supplied should be as accurate as is reasonably practicable in the light of the information in the union's possession at the time when it complied with this requirement of the law.
4. The action is not 'secondary action'
It is unlawful for a union or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise secondary industrial action.
Secondary action - which is sometimes referred to as 'sympathy' or 'solidarity' action - means industrial action by workers whose employer is not a party to the trade dispute to which the action relates.
For these purposes:
- where more than one employer is in dispute with its workers, the dispute between each employer and its workers is treated as a separate dispute
- industrial action which is 'primary' action - ie in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute between workers and their own employer - is not regarded as 'secondary' action simply because it has some effect on another dispute between workers and a different employer
- the calls on workers to breach, or interfere with the performance of contracts will not be regarded as calls to take secondary action if made in the course of attendance for the purpose of peaceful picketing as the law allows
Note that secondary action can be taken not only by those working under contracts of employment - eg employees - but also by someone working under any contract where they personally do work or perform services for another, eg an agency worker or freelancer. Therefore, such workers can also be at risk of taking unlawful secondary action.
5. The action is not to promote closed-shop practices or against non-union firms
It is unlawful for a union or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise industrial action to establish or maintain any sort of union closed-shop practice.
This means that statutory immunity is therefore not available where the reason, or one of the reasons, for the industrial action is either:
- that an employer employs, has employed, or might employ a person who is not a member of a trade union
- to pressurise an employer into discriminating against a person on the grounds of non-membership of a trade union
'Trade union' here can mean any trade union, a particular trade union, or one of a number of particular trade unions.
An employer is discriminating against a person who is not a union member if its conduct in relation to its workers is:
- more favourable to those workers who are members
- different for union members and non-members
In addition, there is no immunity for a relevant act - such as calling for, threatening to call for, or otherwise organising industrial action - which is either:
- designed to exert pressure on an employer to persuade it to impose union-labour-only or recognition requirements on contractors
- taken by the workers of one employer and interferes with the supply (whether or not under a contract) of goods or services by a second employer where the reason, or one of the reasons, for the action, is that the supplier of the goods or services does not recognise, negotiate or consult with trade unions or trade union officials
6. The action is not in support of an employee dismissed for taking part in unofficial industrial action
A union or other person has no immunity if they call for, threaten to call for, or organise industrial action where both:
- the reason, or one of the reasons, for that action is the fact or belief that an employer has dismissed any employee
- the employee has no right to complain of unfair dismissal because they were dismissed while taking part in 'unofficial' industrial action
For these purposes, an 'employer' in relation to an employee includes, in the case where the employment has ceased, the employer they used to work for.
An 'employee' for these purposes who was a member of a union (other than for purposes unconnected with their employment) when they began to take the industrial action and/or at the time they were dismissed will be regarded as having been dismissed while taking 'unofficial' industrial action if, at the time of their dismissal, the act of calling for, threatening to call for or otherwise organising the industrial action, was not the act of the union.
This was because either:
- it was done by a person for whose acts the union was not responsible in law
- although done by a person for whose acts the union was responsible in law, their act has been 'effectively repudiated' by the union's executive committee, president, or general secretary
However, where the relevant act has been so 'repudiated', the employee is not regarded as taking 'unofficial' industrial action until a full working day has passed since the day the repudiation took place.
A 'working day' for these purposes means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, Christmas Day, Good Friday, or a bank holiday as defined under the [1971 c. 80.] Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971.
An employee who was not a union member when they began to take the industrial action in the course of which they were dismissed, and/or when they were actually dismissed, will not be regarded as having been dismissed while taking 'unofficial' action unless, at the time of dismissal, there were others also taking the action who were members of a union that had not authorised or endorsed the action.
7. The action doesn't involve unlawful picketing
For picketing to be lawful and therefore maintain the statutory immunity of those organising the industrial action, certain conditions must be met.
See legal issues during industrial action.
Failure to gain statutory immunity
Where a union or individual fails to meet any or all of the conditions set out above, any resulting industrial action will not be covered by statutory immunity.
As a result, employers and others who are damaged - or likely to be damaged - by the action may take civil proceedings in the courts against the union/individual.
See the legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/statutory-conditions-immunity-when-organising-industrial-action
Links
Lawful industrial action
The need to meet certain conditions before a union or individual can lawfully call for industrial action.
When a worker takes industrial action, they will usually be in breach of their contract of employment or contract for services.
This means that if a trade union calls for, threatens to call for, or otherwise organises industrial action, it is - in practice - calling for the breach, or interference with the performance, of employment contracts.
They may also be interfering with the ability of the employer of those taking the industrial action, and of other employers, to fulfil commercial contracts.
It is unlawful in civil law to induce - or threaten to induce - people to break a contract or to interfere with the performance of a contract. This means that a trade union would face legal action and claims for damages for calling for industrial action.
Therefore, to allow trade unions or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise industrial action lawfully, the law expressly gives them immunity from legal actions under civil law.
However, to obtain this immunity, they must meet certain statutory conditions when organising industrial action. These conditions are that:
- the action is called by someone authorised to do so, as set out in the Trade Union rule book
- there needs to be a 'trade dispute'
- an industrial action ballot must be held
- a notice of industrial action must be provided to the employer
- the action is not 'secondary action'
- the action is not to promote closed-shop practices
- the action is not in support of an employee dismissed for taking unofficial industrial action
- the action is not to enforce trade union membership against non-union firms
- the action doesn't involve unlawful picketing
See statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/lawful-industrial-action
Links
Legal issues during industrial action
The rules for dismissal during industrial action or picketing, and pay for striking workers.
You need to be aware of your own and your workers' legal position during industrial action.
1. Picketing
When pickets try to persuade people not to go to work or not to deliver or collect goods, they may - in effect - be inducing them to break or interfere with the performance of their employment contracts.
They may also be interfering with the ability of the employers of those people to fulfil their commercial contracts.
Such inducement in the course of picketing is not itself lawful simply because the industrial action supported by the picketing is lawfully organised. For the picketing to be lawful, it must satisfy certain conditions laid down by the law.
These conditions include the following:
- that the picketing is at or near the pickets' own place of work
- that the purpose of the picketing is to peacefully obtain or communicate information, or to peacefully persuade a person to work or not to work
However, there are three exceptions to the rule that an inducement in the course of picketing has immunity only if it is done at or near the pickets' own place of work:
- a trade union official may accompany a member of their union whom they represent so long as the member is picketing at their own place of work
- a person - eg a mobile worker - who does not normally work at one particular place, or for whom it is impracticable to picket at their actual place of work, may picket at the premises of the employer for whom they work or from which the work is administered
- a person who is not in employment may picket at their former place of work in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute, but only if the termination of their employment gave rise to - or is connected with - the dispute in support of which they are picketing
Picketing that is not peaceful and, for example, leads to violent or abusive behaviour, intimidation, or obstruction of the highway, is likely to involve offences under the criminal law. The law gives no protection to people who commit such offences in the course of picketing and they may be arrested and prosecuted by the police.
The Department for the Economy's statutory code of practice on picketing recommends that pickets and their organisers should ensure that in general, the number of pickets does not exceed six at any entrance to a workplace.
Failure to observe the provisions of the code does not in itself render a union, or anyone else, liable to any legal proceedings. However, where proceedings are brought against a union, the provisions of the code are admissible in evidence and may be taken into account by a court if they appear relevant to any question before it.
2. Notifying the employer before industrial action resumes
Where continuous industrial action is suspended, eg for further negotiations between the employer and union, the union must normally give the employer further notice before resuming the action.
The exception to this requirement is where the union agrees with the employer that the industrial action will cease to be authorised or endorsed with effect from a date specified in the agreement but that it may be authorised or endorsed again on or after another date specified in the agreement and the union:
- ceases to authorise or endorse the action with effect from the specified date
- subsequently reauthorises or re-endorses the action from a date on or after the originally specified date or such later date as may be agreed with the employer
For this exception to apply, the resumed industrial action must be of the same kind as covered in the original notice. This condition will not be met if, for example, the later action is taken by different or additional descriptions of workers. In order to avoid misunderstanding, both parties should put an agreement in writing.
3. Dismissal for taking industrial action
The dismissal of any striking employee during the first 12 weeks of lawfully organised official industrial action - the 'protected period' - will be deemed unfair if your reason for doing so is because the employee took industrial action.
The dismissal will also be unfair if the employee is dismissed after the protected period, but has stopped taking part in the industrial action before the end of the period.
If you 'lock out' your workforce during the protected period, the lock-out days are not counted when calculating the 12-week period.
The dismissal will also be unfair if:
- the employee is dismissed after the protected period - but had not stopped taking part in the industrial action before the end of the period
- you had failed to take reasonable steps to resolve the dispute
A dismissal can therefore be fair after the protected period if you can show that you made genuine attempts to negotiate a settlement with the trade union - including the proper use of any joint dispute resolution procedure, and have not unreasonably refused requests for third party conciliation or mediation.
Unfair dismissal claims may also be brought if you discriminate between employees by:
- dismissing some of those taking part in the action, but not others
- offering re-engagement selectively to some employees but not others within three months of the dismissal
An employee dismissed while taking part in unofficial action can't generally claim unfair dismissal. This is regardless of whether the employer has discriminated between those taking such action by dismissing - or re-engaging - only some of them.
However, there are cases where an employee who is dismissed during the course of unofficial industrial action will still be able to make a claim for unfair dismissal if they allege that the employer dismissed them for another reason. Generally, these cases relate to family reasons, health and safety, employee representation, and whistleblowing.
See dismissing employees.
4. Pay during industrial action
Where workers take strike action, they are in breach of contract and usually lose their right to pay for the hours they did not work. This may depend on the terms of the employment contract and the nature of the industrial action which the worker has taken.
The situation is more complex when workers take action short of an all-out strike, eg refusing to carry out particular duties. You may refuse to accept this conduct as satisfactory. However, if you accept partial performance of duties, you can't refuse to pay the worker for the part of the job they've carried out.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-issues-during-industrial-action
Links
Legal issues following industrial action
Re-engaging employees after a strike.
An employer may re-engage an employee dismissed during official industrial action on whatever terms the employer chooses, provided it offers the same terms to all dismissed workers.
During the three months following dismissal, an employer cannot selectively re-engage some employees and not others.
However, after three months, the employer can offer to re-engage any of the employees dismissed.
Any week during which an employee takes part in a strike doesn't count towards their continuous employment. This means that a calculation of an employee's length of employment will not include those days on which the employee was on strike. This could be important if an employee later needs to rely on their total length of employment to claim certain rights, eg statutory redundancy pay or unfair dismissal. See continuous employment and employee rights.
However, taking part in a strike won't break an employee's continuity of employment. This means that the terms and conditions of their employment contract won't be discontinued during the strike and then restarted afterward, but will effectively continue during the strike action.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-issues-following-industrial-action
Links
Conducting negotiations to resolve disputes
The importance of effective negotiating styles and skills when dealing with disputes.
Unless you have internal expertise, you may need external specialist negotiators to resolve some disputes.
Who should conduct the negotiations?
In most disputes, negotiating with your workers or their representatives face-to-face will be the quickest, cheapest, and easiest way of sorting out the problem. Both parties to the dispute will know what the issues are and can look for solutions that fit your needs.
Where written procedures exist, they will usually specify who should undertake the negotiations at the various stages and how they should be conducted. Such procedures will be the norm where trade unions are recognised.
In larger, more complex disputes, it may be better to enlist trained people to help with the negotiations.
Trade unions can supply their full-time officers to act as negotiators for their members. Employers' organisations and some firms of solicitors or other professional advisers can supply negotiators to employers. See choose a solicitor for your business.
It might be more cost-effective to train particular staff in negotiating skills. Trade unions also provide such training to their workplace representatives.
The Labour Relations Agency can help facilitate negotiations through collective conciliation.
Negotiating styles
There are two main ways to approach negotiations, and which one is used can affect how fast a dispute is resolved.
The first is the positional win-lose approach. Each negotiator will start by making demands, then each will try to trade off demands against concessions at the best rate they can. All possibilities will be considered as each side will put all their demands as early as possible to get them into the bargain, but this can sometimes be acrimonious and it can lead to long negotiations as each demand is discussed in detail.
The second style employed by negotiators is the principled win-win approach. The two sides compare their overall objectives to find common areas of benefit that can be agreed upon. Often this can be achieved by looking beyond the initial demands to discover the underlying ones.
For instance, do you really want to cut your wages bill or are you actually trying to find a way to increase profitability? Do your workers really want shorter hours or are they looking for more family-friendly and flexible working patterns? The win-win approach is less confrontational but risks being seen as a compromise that may not be the best result for anyone.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/conducting-negotiations-resolve-disputes
Links
The legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity
How the law works when the statutory immunities do not apply, making any subsequent industrial action unlawful.
Where statutory immunity for organising industrial action has not been met, eg because a union or individual has failed to organise a proper secret ballot, employers and others (such as their customers and suppliers) who are damaged - or likely to be damaged - by the action may take civil proceedings in the courts against the union or individual.
However, the person wishing to bring civil proceedings must still show that:
- an unlawful, unprotected act has been done or is threatened
- they are party to a contract which will be - or has been - broken or interfered with by the unlawful act
- they are likely to suffer - or have suffered - loss as a result
In addition, an individual deprived of goods or services because of the unlawful organisation of industrial action can also bring proceedings to stop this happening.
However, for this purpose, the individual does not need to show that they are party to a contract, which will be - or has been - broken or interfered with by the unlawful act.
Who can be sued as a result of unlawful industrial action?
Civil proceedings will normally be taken against the trade union or individual organising the industrial action.
However, in the case of picketing, it may be possible to sue the individual pickets as well as those who organised the unlawful picketing. This is because the pickets are inducing interference with the performance of contracts.
Note that even if it's a union that is responsible for organising unlawful industrial action, this does not prevent legal proceedings from being brought against the individual organisers.
Trade union liability for inducing breach of contract
The law states the circumstances in which a trade union is to be held responsible for a relevant act, eg inducing - or threatening to induce - a breach or interference with the performance of a contract.
Where these circumstances apply, a union will be held responsible for a relevant act regardless of any term or condition to the contrary in its own rules, or in any other contractual provision or rule of law.
A union will be liable for any relevant act, which is done, authorised, or endorsed by:
- its executive committee
- its general secretary or president
- any person given power under the union's own rules to do so
- any other committee of the union or any official of the union
For these purposes:
- A 'committee of the union' is any group of persons constituted in accordance with the rules of the union.
- A relevant act will be taken to have been done, authorised, or endorsed by an official if it was done, authorised, or endorsed by a group of persons, or any member of a group, to which an official belonged at the relevant time if the group's purposes include organising or co-ordinating industrial action.
- An 'official' is any person who is an officer of the union or a branch or section of the union or any person who is elected or appointed in accordance with the union's rules to be a representative of its members. This includes any person elected or appointed who is an employee of the same employer as the members, or one or more of the members, they are elected to represent, eg a shop steward.
However, if a relevant act that is done (or authorised or endorsed) by such a committee or official is 'effectively repudiated' by the union's executive committee, general secretary, or president, the union will not be held liable.
In order to avoid liability in this way, the executive committee, president, or general secretary of the union must repudiate the act as soon as reasonably practicable after it has come to the knowledge of any of them, and the union must, without delay:
- give written notice of the repudiation to the committee or official in question
- do its best to give individual written notice of the fact and date of the repudiation to every member of the union who it has reason to believe is taking part - or might otherwise take part - in industrial action as a result of the act and give similar written notice to the employer of every such member
The written notice of repudiation given to the union's members must contain the following statement:
"Your union has repudiated the call (or calls) for industrial action to which this notice relates and will give no support to unofficial industrial action taken in response to it (or them). If you are dismissed while taking unofficial industrial action, you will have no right to complain of unfair dismissal."
However, even if it takes these steps, a union will not be considered to have 'effectively repudiated' an act if:
- the executive committee, president, or general secretary subsequently behaves in a way that is inconsistent with the repudiation
- at any time up to three months after the repudiation, a party to a commercial contract that has been, or maybe, interfered with by the relevant act, requests the union's executive committee, president, or general secretary to confirm that the act has been repudiated, and written confirmation is not then given
Remedies
Where statutory immunity does not apply, those party to contracts which are broken, or the performance of which is interfered with, by the organisation of - or a threat to organise - industrial action, may seek an injunction against the organisers from the courts.
A court may, after examining the circumstances, grant an injunction on an interim basis pending a full hearing of the case. However, the union or individual against whom the order is sought will have the legal right to be given a chance to put their case forward.
If an injunction is not obeyed, those who sought it can go back to court and ask to have those concerned declared in contempt of court.
Anyone found to be in contempt of court may face heavy fines or other penalties which the court may consider appropriate. For example, a union may be deprived of its assets through sequestration. This is where the funds are placed in the control of a person appointed by the court who may, in particular, pay any fines or legal costs arising from the court proceedings.
It is also possible to claim damages for losses suffered - which may, but need not, be preceded by an application for an injunction - if the basis of the proceedings is a claim that an act involved breach, or interference with the performance of contracts.
Note that there are upper limits on the amounts a court can award by way of damages in any proceedings against a trade union. These limits depend on the size of the union concerned.
Limits on awards for damages against a union organising unlawful industrial action
Number of trade union members Upper limit on award for damages Fewer than 5,000 £10,000 5,000 - 24,999 £50,000 25,000 - 99,999 £125,000 100,000 or more £250,000
Other unlawful acts during industrial action
Those who have organised lawful industrial action are only protected from legal action for a relevant act, eg inducing breaches, or interference with the performance of contracts.
As such, there is no immunity for strikers or their organisers who commit other civil wrongs or criminal offences.
For example:
- if strikers or their organisers commit a criminal offence, such as intentional damage to property, they are liable to be arrested and prosecuted by the police in the same way as anyone else who commits such an offence
- if strikers or their organisers commit an unlawful trespass, eg by entering premises without authority or by staging a 'sit-in', they are liable to be sued for that and any other unlawful acts involved just like any other members of the public who occupy premises unlawfully
Also, note that the union has immunity only if the sole ground of liability is a relevant act - such as inducing a breach of contract. If some other non-protected ground of liability exists, immunity will be lost.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-consequences-failing-gain-statutory-immunity
Links
Conducting industrial action ballots
How a union must conduct a ballot before it can call for official industrial action.
If the employer and the union have exhausted all other available means of resolving a dispute, the union may feel that there is no alternative but to call on its members to take industrial action.
However, for the industrial action to be lawful, it must meet certain conditions. One of these is that the union calling for the action must hold a properly conducted secret ballot.
For information on the other conditions, see lawful industrial action.
The law sets out certain requirements that the union must satisfy for the ballot to be legitimate. These requirements are set out below.
1. Independent scrutiny
For a ballot where more than 50 members have the right to vote, the union must appoint a qualified independent person as the scrutineer of the ballot. Information on who qualifies as a scrutineer is available from the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) - contact the LRA.
The total number of members with the right to vote can be an aggregate number of members from one - or more than one - workplace and where this is more than 50, scrutiny procedures must be followed.
A scrutineer must be, to the best belief of the union, independent of the union and able to carry out their duties competently.
The scrutineer's terms of appointment must include producing a report on the conduct of the ballot. They must produce the report as soon as reasonably practicable after the date of the ballot - and not later than four weeks after that date.
The union must provide a copy of the scrutineer's report to any union member who was entitled to vote in the ballot and any employer of such a member who requests one within six months of the date of the ballot.
The copy must be supplied as soon as reasonably practicable and free of charge - or on payment of a reasonable fee specified by the union. The scrutineer's report must say whether or not the ballot has been conducted fairly and lawfully.
See the Department for the Economy's code of practice on industrial action ballots and notice to employers for further information on scrutineers.
2. Sending employers notice of the ballot and a sample voting paper
The union must take such steps as are reasonably necessary to ensure that any employer of any union members who are entitled to vote receives certain information.
The union must send this information not later than the seventh day before the intended opening day of the ballot, ie the first day when a voting paper is sent to any person entitled to vote.
The notice must be in writing and must:
- state that the union intends to hold the ballot
- specify the date which the union reasonably believes will be the opening day of the ballot
- provide a list of the categories of employee to which the employees concerned belong, a list of the workplaces at which the employees concerned work, figures on the number of employees in each category, the number of employees at each workplace, the total number of employees concerned plus an explanation of how these figures were arrived at
Note that the lists and figures mentioned above do not need to be provided in full where the workers concerned pay their union subscriptions by deduction from pay at source, ie through the so-called 'check off' system.
In such circumstances, the notice must contain either:
- those same lists, figures, and explanations as set out above
- information that will allow the employer to easily work out the total number of employees concerned, the categories of employee to which they belong, the number of employees concerned in each of those categories, the workplaces at which the employees concerned work, and the number of them at each of these workplaces
The 'employees concerned' are those whom the union reasonably believes will be entitled to vote in the ballot.
Not later than the third day before the intended opening day of the ballot, the union must send the employer a sample of the voting paper (and any variants of it) which will be sent to the workers concerned.
The paper must:
- state the name of the independent scrutineer, where appropriate
- give the return address, and the date, it is to be returned by
- have a number, which is one of a series of consecutive numbers used to give a different number to each voting paper
- make it clear whether voters are being asked if they are prepared to take part in - or to continue to take part in - industrial action which consists of a strike, or industrial action short of a strike (which includes overtime bans and call-out bans)
- specify the person(s) and/or class(es) of person(s) who the union intends to have authority to make the first call for industrial action relating to the ballot, if the vote is in favour of industrial action
The paper must also contain the following statement: "If you take part in strike or other industrial action, you may be in breach of your contract of employment. However, if you are dismissed for taking part in a strike or other industrial action which is called officially and is otherwise lawful, the dismissal will be unfair if it takes place fewer than twelve weeks after you started taking part in the action, and depending on the circumstances may be unfair if it takes place later."
That statement must not be qualified or commented upon by anything else on the voting paper.
3. Timing of the ballot and related action
If members vote in favour of industrial action, the action must begin within four weeks of the date of the ballot.
However, a union may be allowed to make its first call for industrial action more than four weeks after the date of the ballot if either:
- the employer and union agree on an extension of up to a further four weeks, eg to continue with talks that are making progress
- an injunction granted by a court (or an undertaking given by the union to the court) prohibits the union from calling for industrial action during some part, or the whole, of the four weeks following the date of the ballot, and the injunction subsequently lapses or is set aside, or the union is released from its undertaking
In the latter case, a union may apply for a court order which, if granted, would provide that the period of the prohibition would not count towards the four-week period for which ballots are normally effective.
The union must apply to the court no more than eight weeks after the date of the ballot. In such cases, the ballot cannot be effective if a union's first call for industrial action is made more than 12 weeks after the date of the ballot.
If the court believes that the result of a ballot no longer represents the views of union members, or that something has happened or is likely to happen that would result in union members voting against taking, or continuing with, action if there were a fresh ballot, it may not make such an order.
Note that a union cannot gain statutory immunity merely by holding a properly conducted secret ballot after previously calling for industrial action without one.
4. Entitlement to vote
All those members whom the union - at the time of the ballot - reasonably believes will be induced by the union to take part in or continue with the industrial action, must be given the equal entitlement to vote. No one else may be given a vote - otherwise, the ballot will be invalid.
The union may choose whether or not to give a vote to 'overseas members', ie members other than merchant seamen and offshore workers who are outside Northern Ireland at the time of the ballot.
However, members who are in Great Britain throughout the voting period for an industrial action ballot and who will be called upon to take part in, or continue with the industrial action must be given entitlement to vote in the ballot if either:
- their place of work is in Northern Ireland and the ballot is of members at their place of work
- the industrial action to which the ballot relates will involve members in Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland and the ballot is a general one covering workplaces in both Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Members required to be given entitlement to vote by either of these requirements do not count as 'overseas members' for the purposes of the law on industrial action balloting.
The ballot will also be invalid if anyone denied entitlement to vote is subsequently called on to take part in the action by the union with the exception of union members who either:
- were not members at the time of the ballot
- were members at the time of the ballot but who it was not reasonable for the union to expect to be called upon to take action, eg because they changed jobs after the ballot
Where the members of a union with different workplaces are to be balloted, a separate ballot will be necessary for each workplace unless one of the conditions set out below is met. It will be unlawful for the union to organise industrial action at any such workplace where a majority of those voting in the ballot for that workplace have not voted 'Yes' in response to the relevant required question(s). If a worker works at or from a single set of premises, their workplace is those premises. If not, it is the premises with which their employment has the closest connection.
In summary, the conditions for holding a single ballot for more than one workplace are that:
- at each of the workplaces covered by the single ballot there is at least one member of the union affected by the dispute
- entitlement to vote in the single ballot is given and limited to all of a union's members who, according to the union's reasonable belief, are employed in a particular occupation or occupations by one employer or any of a number of employers with whom the union is in dispute
- entitlement to vote in the single ballot is given and limited to all of a union's members who are employed by a particular employer or any of a number of employers with whom the union is in dispute
It is possible for a union to hold more than one ballot on a dispute at a single workplace. If the conditions above are met, some or all of those ballots may also cover members in other workplaces.
5. Voting procedures
Voting must be made by the marking of a voting paper. The union should have sent the employer a sample of this at least three days before the start of the voting.
Those voting must be allowed to do so without interference from or constraint imposed by the union or any of its members, officials, or workers.
So far as is reasonably practicable, every member properly entitled to vote must be:
- able to vote in secret
- given a convenient opportunity to vote by post at no direct cost to themselves
- sent a voting paper by post to their home address or any other address which they have asked the union, in writing, to treat as their postal address
There is a limited exception to these rules for the balloting of union members who are merchant seamen and the union reasonably believes that they will be employed in a ship at sea (or outside Northern Ireland) at some time during the voting period and that it will be convenient for them to vote while on the ship or where the ship is.
The voting paper must ask whether or not the voter is prepared to take part in - or continue to take part in - either:
- a strike
- action short of a strike, eg, an overtime or call-out ban
While the question(s) may be framed in different ways, the voter must be able to answer either 'Yes' or 'No' to indicate whether they are willing to take part in - or continue with - the industrial action.
The voting paper must specify the person(s) or description of the person(s) who the union intends to have authority to call for industrial action to which the ballot relates if the vote is in favour of industrial action.
For this purpose, anyone so specified need not be authorised under the union's rules to call on members to take industrial action but must be among those for whose acts the union is responsible in law.
6. Majority support
Majority support must be obtained in response to the question(s) on the voting paper that is appropriate to the type of industrial action concerned, ie:
- in the case of a strike, majority support must be obtained in response to a question on the voting paper which asks if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) strike action
- in the case of action short of a strike, majority support must be obtained in response to a question on the voting paper which asks if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) action short of a strike
- if the action consists or may consist of a strike and other industrial action, majority support must be obtained for each type of action in response to separate questions on the voting paper asking if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) each type
Majority support means the majority of those who actually vote, not the majority of those entitled to vote.
7. Announcing ballot results
A union must, as soon as reasonably practicable after holding an industrial action ballot, take steps to inform all those entitled to vote, and their employer(s), of the number of:
- votes cast in the ballot
- spoiled voting papers
- individuals answering 'No' to the required question(s)
- individuals answering 'Yes' to the required question(s)
Where separate workplace ballots are required, these details must be notified separately to those entitled to vote at each workplace.
If overseas members of a trade union have been given entitlement to vote in an industrial action ballot, the detailed information about its result need not be sent to them. However, the information supplied to non-overseas members in accordance with the statutory requirements must give separate details relating to overseas and non-overseas members. For these purposes, members in Great Britain given entitlement to vote do not count as overseas members.
8. Consequences of a union's failure to meet balloting requirements
If a union fails to satisfy the statutory requirements relating to the ballot or to give employers notice of industrial action (apart from certain small accidental failures that are unlikely to affect the result), this failure will give grounds for proceedings against a union by:
- a customer
- an employer
- a supplier of an employer
- an individual member of the public claiming that an effect or likely effect of the industrial action would be to prevent or delay the supply of goods or services to them or to reduce the quality of goods or services supplied
With the exception of failures to comply with the requirements to give notice to employers, such failures will also give grounds for action by the union's members.
If a union fails only to provide the required notice of intent to ballot or the sample voting paper to a particular employer who should have received it, only that employer or any individual deprived of goods or services because of the industrial action can bring proceedings.
Failure to satisfy any other balloting requirements will expose the union to proceedings brought by others, eg by its own members.
9. Calls for industrial action from individuals unspecified on the voting paper
A ballot will not give a union statutory immunity from legal proceedings if industrial action is called by a person not specified or described on the voting paper.
Therefore, if someone calls for action other than a specified person and no call is made by a specified person, the union would be at risk of proceedings being brought against it unless it effectively repudiated the call.
10. Statutory code of practice on industrial action notices and ballots
The Department for the Economy's statutory code of practice for industrial ballots and notice to employers promotes good practice in the conduct of industrial action ballots arranged by a trade union and in the preparation of notices to employers.
Failure to observe the provisions of the code does not in itself render a union, or anyone else, liable to any legal proceedings. However, where proceedings are brought against a union, the provisions of the code are admissible in evidence and may be taken into account by a court if they appear relevant to any question before it.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/conducting-industrial-action-ballots
Links
Dealing with industrial disputes
In this guide:
- Industrial disputes
- Avoiding disputes with your workforce
- Dealing with industrial disputes
- Statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action
- Lawful industrial action
- Legal issues during industrial action
- Legal issues following industrial action
- Conducting negotiations to resolve disputes
- The legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity
- Conducting industrial action ballots
Avoiding disputes with your workforce
How open communication can help create a conflict-free working environment and prevent disputes from arising.
Good relations between you and your staff are key to creating a productive working environment. You should, therefore, seek to encourage a workplace culture that prevents conflicts from arising.
If you fail to do so, collective grievances could arise, which could, in turn, lead to workers making tribunal claims or calling for industrial action. See staff motivation.
Informing and consulting your workforce and their representatives
It is good practice to develop channels for informing and consulting your workforce and/or their representatives on employment matters and business developments. Indeed, in some cases, you are legally obliged to inform and consult them, eg about collective redundancy situations. See engaging with staff.
Depending on the size of the business, you could set up:
- voluntary recognition with a trade union for collective bargaining purposes
- regular consultations with a recognised trade union - an effective working relationship with union officials can pick up problems before they escalate
- a staff forum or joint working group to pass on information to, collect ideas from, and consult with workers
- an employee consultative body to discuss major issues as they arise
- team and group meetings and feedback sessions
Many employers, especially those which recognise trade unions, have written procedures in place to discuss collective grievances with representatives and other significant issues affecting all or part of the workforce. Procedures are important as they can help you to structure and address problems at an early stage.
If you already have such procedures, you should ensure you follow them effectively and consistently.
If you don't have such procedures, you could consider putting some together in consultation with workers and/or their representatives.
See managing conflict.
The role of Labour Relations Agency (LRA) in preventing disputes
The LRA is an independent statutory body whose role is to improve working life through better employment relations.
The LRA not only helps to resolve a dispute once it arises but also helps employers and workers (or their representatives) work together to prevent disputes from arising in the first place.
The LRA's Good Practice Facilitation and Advisory services are dedicated to preventing workplace disputes where a problem has arisen but has not yet developed into a serious dispute. It will facilitate and offer services such as - assisted bargaining, collaborative working, and joint problem-solving parties, with a view to helping to prevent a dispute by facilitating sustainable solutions that are acceptable to all parties. See LRA dispute resolution services.
The LRA also delivers training and runs briefings, seminars, webinars, and workshops aimed at helping organisations adopt or develop better employment relations practices. LRA good practice seminars.
Employment document toolkit
The LRA has a free online employment document toolkit, once employers are registered they can unlock our free core employment guides to help them build documents, policies, and procedures for their own organisation. Find out about the LRA's free employment document toolkit.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/avoiding-disputes-your-workforce
Links
Dealing with industrial disputes
Ways to resolve disputes with groups of workers through mediation, conciliation, and arbitration.
If a dispute arises, you should meet with representatives of your workers to resolve the problem as soon as possible. Where you have agreed on procedures to meet and discuss such matters with a recognised trade union or other representatives, these procedures should be followed.
The initial concerns of the meeting should be to:
- define the actual cause of the dispute
- clarify who speaks for each side
- explore what options are available to resolve the dispute
In many cases, this meeting, or negotiations that follow it, will resolve the dispute. However, if negotiations become deadlocked, it may be necessary to call in outside help, possibly from the Labour Relations Agency (LRA). Its services are free.
LRA collective conciliation
Collective conciliation is a voluntary process where the LRA conciliators attempt to help employers and employees (normally via trade unions) discuss their differences and reach mutually acceptable settlements of their collective disputes. Outcomes are not imposed or judgements made on the rights and wrongs of the matter in dispute.
The main issues referred for collective conciliation include annual pay reviews; other terms and conditions eg shift hours, bonuses, changes in working practices, redundancy selection; and trade union recognition. Collective conciliation is normally only appropriate when the parties have exhausted their own internal procedures, or they agree it's required.
LRA collective conciliation explained.
LRA mediation service
The mediation service focuses on restoring productive working relationships between individuals and/or groups where those have broken down. Mediation is delivered by the LRA in-house accredited workplace mediators. Mediation is especially suitable when the aim is to maintain the employment relationship. It is often most effective if used in the early stages of a dispute.
LRA arbitration service
The LRA offers the following arbitration services for industrial disputes:
- Industrial arbitrations - these are arranged by the LRA in accordance with its statutory powers under Article 84 of the Industrial Relations (Northern Ireland) Order 1992. In accepting such arbitrations the Agency must be satisfied that any negotiating procedures have been exhausted or are unlikely to resolve the issue and that the dispute cannot be settled by conciliation. This service is provided to employers and unions and, in exceptional circumstances, to individual employees.
- Procedural arbitrations - these are where national or sectoral negotiating procedures provide for arbitration as the final stage in the procedures.
Industrial arbitration is also voluntary but the parties accept in advance to be bound by the arbitrator's resolution, made within agreed terms of reference for the arbitrator. The decision, however, is not legally binding (unlike the LRA Arbitration Scheme, which is legally binding).
The decision to go to arbitration may be ad-hoc or may be an agreed stage in the parties' dispute resolution procedure.
LRA Arbitration and Independent Appeals.
Failure to resolve a collective workplace dispute
If you fail to resolve a dispute with a group of workers and/or their representatives, they may consider taking industrial action.
However, in order for such action to be lawful, it must meet a number of conditions. See lawful industrial action.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/dealing-industrial-disputes
Links
Statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action
The statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action.
A union or individual must meet certain statutory conditions when organising industrial action.
1. The need for there to be a trade dispute
A person or trade union who calls for, threatens to call for, or otherwise organises industrial action, has immunity from civil action for inducing a breach of contract or interfering with a contract's performance only if acting in contemplation or furtherance of a 'trade dispute'.
For there to be a trade dispute:
- there must be a dispute between workers and their own employer
- the dispute must be wholly or mainly about specified employment-related matters such as:
(a) terms and conditions of employment, or the physical conditions in which any workers are required to work
(b) engagement or non-engagement, or termination or suspension of employment or the duties of employment, of one or more workers
(c) allocation of work or the duties of employment as between workers or groups of workers
(d) matters of discipline
(e) the membership or non-membership of a trade union on the part of a worker
(f) facilities for officials of trade unions
(g) machinery for negotiation or consultation, and other procedures, relating to any of the foregoing matters, including the recognition by employers or employers' associations of the right of a trade union to represent workers in any such negotiation or consultation or in the carrying out of such procedures
The relevant definition does not cover disputes:
- between workers and an employer other than their own employer
- not wholly or mainly about specified employment-related matters like pay and conditions
- between groups of workers or between trade unions, ie where no employer is involved in the dispute
- between a trade union and an employer, where none of that employer's workforce is in dispute with that employer
- relating to matters occurring overseas - except where workers taking action in the UK in support of the dispute are likely to be affected by its outcome
2. The need to hold an industrial action ballot
If a trade union decides to call on its members to take - or continue to take - industrial action, it will have no immunity unless it first holds a properly conducted secret ballot.
See conducting industrial action ballots.
3. The need to provide a notice of official industrial action to the employer
The union organising the industrial action must ensure that the employer receives written notice from the union which:
- Reaches the employer after the union has taken steps to notify the employer of the result of the industrial action ballot, but no less than seven days before the day - or the first of the days - specified in the notice.
- Specifies whether the union intends the industrial action to be 'continuous' or 'discontinuous'. The notice must also give the date on which any of the affected employees will be called on to begin the action (if continuous) or the dates on which any of them will be called on to take part (if discontinuous). Industrial action is 'discontinuous' if it involves industrial action other than on all the days when it might be taken by those concerned. An indefinite strike would, therefore, be continuous. However, an overtime ban might be continuous or discontinuous, depending on whether the ban applied to overtime working on all the days on which overtime would otherwise be worked or to overtime working on only some of those days.
- Provides a list of the categories and workplaces of the employees who are going to take part in the industrial action (the 'affected employees'), figures on the numbers of affected employees in each category, figures on the numbers of affected employees at each workplace and the total numbers of affected employees. The union must also explain how it worked out the figures it provides.
- Is given by any officer, official, or committee of the union which is inducing - and is therefore responsible for - the industrial action.
Note that the lists and figures mentioned above do not need to be provided in full where all of the affected workers pay their union subscriptions by deduction from pay at source, ie through the so-called 'check off' system.
In such circumstances, the notice must contain either:
- those same lists, figures, and explanations as set out above
- information that will allow the employer readily to work out the total number of workers concerned, the categories of workers to which they belong, the number of workers concerned in each of those categories, the workplaces at which the workers concerned work, and the number of them at each of these workplaces
Where only some of the affected workers pay their union subscriptions by the check-off, the union's notice may include both types of information, ie the lists, figures, and explanations should be provided for those who do not pay their subscriptions through the check-off, while information relating to check-off payments may suffice for those who do.
The lists and figures or information supplied should be as accurate as is reasonably practicable in the light of the information in the union's possession at the time when it complied with this requirement of the law.
4. The action is not 'secondary action'
It is unlawful for a union or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise secondary industrial action.
Secondary action - which is sometimes referred to as 'sympathy' or 'solidarity' action - means industrial action by workers whose employer is not a party to the trade dispute to which the action relates.
For these purposes:
- where more than one employer is in dispute with its workers, the dispute between each employer and its workers is treated as a separate dispute
- industrial action which is 'primary' action - ie in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute between workers and their own employer - is not regarded as 'secondary' action simply because it has some effect on another dispute between workers and a different employer
- the calls on workers to breach, or interfere with the performance of contracts will not be regarded as calls to take secondary action if made in the course of attendance for the purpose of peaceful picketing as the law allows
Note that secondary action can be taken not only by those working under contracts of employment - eg employees - but also by someone working under any contract where they personally do work or perform services for another, eg an agency worker or freelancer. Therefore, such workers can also be at risk of taking unlawful secondary action.
5. The action is not to promote closed-shop practices or against non-union firms
It is unlawful for a union or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise industrial action to establish or maintain any sort of union closed-shop practice.
This means that statutory immunity is therefore not available where the reason, or one of the reasons, for the industrial action is either:
- that an employer employs, has employed, or might employ a person who is not a member of a trade union
- to pressurise an employer into discriminating against a person on the grounds of non-membership of a trade union
'Trade union' here can mean any trade union, a particular trade union, or one of a number of particular trade unions.
An employer is discriminating against a person who is not a union member if its conduct in relation to its workers is:
- more favourable to those workers who are members
- different for union members and non-members
In addition, there is no immunity for a relevant act - such as calling for, threatening to call for, or otherwise organising industrial action - which is either:
- designed to exert pressure on an employer to persuade it to impose union-labour-only or recognition requirements on contractors
- taken by the workers of one employer and interferes with the supply (whether or not under a contract) of goods or services by a second employer where the reason, or one of the reasons, for the action, is that the supplier of the goods or services does not recognise, negotiate or consult with trade unions or trade union officials
6. The action is not in support of an employee dismissed for taking part in unofficial industrial action
A union or other person has no immunity if they call for, threaten to call for, or organise industrial action where both:
- the reason, or one of the reasons, for that action is the fact or belief that an employer has dismissed any employee
- the employee has no right to complain of unfair dismissal because they were dismissed while taking part in 'unofficial' industrial action
For these purposes, an 'employer' in relation to an employee includes, in the case where the employment has ceased, the employer they used to work for.
An 'employee' for these purposes who was a member of a union (other than for purposes unconnected with their employment) when they began to take the industrial action and/or at the time they were dismissed will be regarded as having been dismissed while taking 'unofficial' industrial action if, at the time of their dismissal, the act of calling for, threatening to call for or otherwise organising the industrial action, was not the act of the union.
This was because either:
- it was done by a person for whose acts the union was not responsible in law
- although done by a person for whose acts the union was responsible in law, their act has been 'effectively repudiated' by the union's executive committee, president, or general secretary
However, where the relevant act has been so 'repudiated', the employee is not regarded as taking 'unofficial' industrial action until a full working day has passed since the day the repudiation took place.
A 'working day' for these purposes means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, Christmas Day, Good Friday, or a bank holiday as defined under the [1971 c. 80.] Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971.
An employee who was not a union member when they began to take the industrial action in the course of which they were dismissed, and/or when they were actually dismissed, will not be regarded as having been dismissed while taking 'unofficial' action unless, at the time of dismissal, there were others also taking the action who were members of a union that had not authorised or endorsed the action.
7. The action doesn't involve unlawful picketing
For picketing to be lawful and therefore maintain the statutory immunity of those organising the industrial action, certain conditions must be met.
See legal issues during industrial action.
Failure to gain statutory immunity
Where a union or individual fails to meet any or all of the conditions set out above, any resulting industrial action will not be covered by statutory immunity.
As a result, employers and others who are damaged - or likely to be damaged - by the action may take civil proceedings in the courts against the union/individual.
See the legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/statutory-conditions-immunity-when-organising-industrial-action
Links
Lawful industrial action
The need to meet certain conditions before a union or individual can lawfully call for industrial action.
When a worker takes industrial action, they will usually be in breach of their contract of employment or contract for services.
This means that if a trade union calls for, threatens to call for, or otherwise organises industrial action, it is - in practice - calling for the breach, or interference with the performance, of employment contracts.
They may also be interfering with the ability of the employer of those taking the industrial action, and of other employers, to fulfil commercial contracts.
It is unlawful in civil law to induce - or threaten to induce - people to break a contract or to interfere with the performance of a contract. This means that a trade union would face legal action and claims for damages for calling for industrial action.
Therefore, to allow trade unions or others to call for, threaten to call for, or otherwise organise industrial action lawfully, the law expressly gives them immunity from legal actions under civil law.
However, to obtain this immunity, they must meet certain statutory conditions when organising industrial action. These conditions are that:
- the action is called by someone authorised to do so, as set out in the Trade Union rule book
- there needs to be a 'trade dispute'
- an industrial action ballot must be held
- a notice of industrial action must be provided to the employer
- the action is not 'secondary action'
- the action is not to promote closed-shop practices
- the action is not in support of an employee dismissed for taking unofficial industrial action
- the action is not to enforce trade union membership against non-union firms
- the action doesn't involve unlawful picketing
See statutory conditions for immunity when organising industrial action.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/lawful-industrial-action
Links
Legal issues during industrial action
The rules for dismissal during industrial action or picketing, and pay for striking workers.
You need to be aware of your own and your workers' legal position during industrial action.
1. Picketing
When pickets try to persuade people not to go to work or not to deliver or collect goods, they may - in effect - be inducing them to break or interfere with the performance of their employment contracts.
They may also be interfering with the ability of the employers of those people to fulfil their commercial contracts.
Such inducement in the course of picketing is not itself lawful simply because the industrial action supported by the picketing is lawfully organised. For the picketing to be lawful, it must satisfy certain conditions laid down by the law.
These conditions include the following:
- that the picketing is at or near the pickets' own place of work
- that the purpose of the picketing is to peacefully obtain or communicate information, or to peacefully persuade a person to work or not to work
However, there are three exceptions to the rule that an inducement in the course of picketing has immunity only if it is done at or near the pickets' own place of work:
- a trade union official may accompany a member of their union whom they represent so long as the member is picketing at their own place of work
- a person - eg a mobile worker - who does not normally work at one particular place, or for whom it is impracticable to picket at their actual place of work, may picket at the premises of the employer for whom they work or from which the work is administered
- a person who is not in employment may picket at their former place of work in contemplation or furtherance of a trade dispute, but only if the termination of their employment gave rise to - or is connected with - the dispute in support of which they are picketing
Picketing that is not peaceful and, for example, leads to violent or abusive behaviour, intimidation, or obstruction of the highway, is likely to involve offences under the criminal law. The law gives no protection to people who commit such offences in the course of picketing and they may be arrested and prosecuted by the police.
The Department for the Economy's statutory code of practice on picketing recommends that pickets and their organisers should ensure that in general, the number of pickets does not exceed six at any entrance to a workplace.
Failure to observe the provisions of the code does not in itself render a union, or anyone else, liable to any legal proceedings. However, where proceedings are brought against a union, the provisions of the code are admissible in evidence and may be taken into account by a court if they appear relevant to any question before it.
2. Notifying the employer before industrial action resumes
Where continuous industrial action is suspended, eg for further negotiations between the employer and union, the union must normally give the employer further notice before resuming the action.
The exception to this requirement is where the union agrees with the employer that the industrial action will cease to be authorised or endorsed with effect from a date specified in the agreement but that it may be authorised or endorsed again on or after another date specified in the agreement and the union:
- ceases to authorise or endorse the action with effect from the specified date
- subsequently reauthorises or re-endorses the action from a date on or after the originally specified date or such later date as may be agreed with the employer
For this exception to apply, the resumed industrial action must be of the same kind as covered in the original notice. This condition will not be met if, for example, the later action is taken by different or additional descriptions of workers. In order to avoid misunderstanding, both parties should put an agreement in writing.
3. Dismissal for taking industrial action
The dismissal of any striking employee during the first 12 weeks of lawfully organised official industrial action - the 'protected period' - will be deemed unfair if your reason for doing so is because the employee took industrial action.
The dismissal will also be unfair if the employee is dismissed after the protected period, but has stopped taking part in the industrial action before the end of the period.
If you 'lock out' your workforce during the protected period, the lock-out days are not counted when calculating the 12-week period.
The dismissal will also be unfair if:
- the employee is dismissed after the protected period - but had not stopped taking part in the industrial action before the end of the period
- you had failed to take reasonable steps to resolve the dispute
A dismissal can therefore be fair after the protected period if you can show that you made genuine attempts to negotiate a settlement with the trade union - including the proper use of any joint dispute resolution procedure, and have not unreasonably refused requests for third party conciliation or mediation.
Unfair dismissal claims may also be brought if you discriminate between employees by:
- dismissing some of those taking part in the action, but not others
- offering re-engagement selectively to some employees but not others within three months of the dismissal
An employee dismissed while taking part in unofficial action can't generally claim unfair dismissal. This is regardless of whether the employer has discriminated between those taking such action by dismissing - or re-engaging - only some of them.
However, there are cases where an employee who is dismissed during the course of unofficial industrial action will still be able to make a claim for unfair dismissal if they allege that the employer dismissed them for another reason. Generally, these cases relate to family reasons, health and safety, employee representation, and whistleblowing.
See dismissing employees.
4. Pay during industrial action
Where workers take strike action, they are in breach of contract and usually lose their right to pay for the hours they did not work. This may depend on the terms of the employment contract and the nature of the industrial action which the worker has taken.
The situation is more complex when workers take action short of an all-out strike, eg refusing to carry out particular duties. You may refuse to accept this conduct as satisfactory. However, if you accept partial performance of duties, you can't refuse to pay the worker for the part of the job they've carried out.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-issues-during-industrial-action
Links
Legal issues following industrial action
Re-engaging employees after a strike.
An employer may re-engage an employee dismissed during official industrial action on whatever terms the employer chooses, provided it offers the same terms to all dismissed workers.
During the three months following dismissal, an employer cannot selectively re-engage some employees and not others.
However, after three months, the employer can offer to re-engage any of the employees dismissed.
Any week during which an employee takes part in a strike doesn't count towards their continuous employment. This means that a calculation of an employee's length of employment will not include those days on which the employee was on strike. This could be important if an employee later needs to rely on their total length of employment to claim certain rights, eg statutory redundancy pay or unfair dismissal. See continuous employment and employee rights.
However, taking part in a strike won't break an employee's continuity of employment. This means that the terms and conditions of their employment contract won't be discontinued during the strike and then restarted afterward, but will effectively continue during the strike action.
Developed withActionsAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-issues-following-industrial-action
Links
Conducting negotiations to resolve disputes
The importance of effective negotiating styles and skills when dealing with disputes.
Unless you have internal expertise, you may need external specialist negotiators to resolve some disputes.
Who should conduct the negotiations?
In most disputes, negotiating with your workers or their representatives face-to-face will be the quickest, cheapest, and easiest way of sorting out the problem. Both parties to the dispute will know what the issues are and can look for solutions that fit your needs.
Where written procedures exist, they will usually specify who should undertake the negotiations at the various stages and how they should be conducted. Such procedures will be the norm where trade unions are recognised.
In larger, more complex disputes, it may be better to enlist trained people to help with the negotiations.
Trade unions can supply their full-time officers to act as negotiators for their members. Employers' organisations and some firms of solicitors or other professional advisers can supply negotiators to employers. See choose a solicitor for your business.
It might be more cost-effective to train particular staff in negotiating skills. Trade unions also provide such training to their workplace representatives.
The Labour Relations Agency can help facilitate negotiations through collective conciliation.
Negotiating styles
There are two main ways to approach negotiations, and which one is used can affect how fast a dispute is resolved.
The first is the positional win-lose approach. Each negotiator will start by making demands, then each will try to trade off demands against concessions at the best rate they can. All possibilities will be considered as each side will put all their demands as early as possible to get them into the bargain, but this can sometimes be acrimonious and it can lead to long negotiations as each demand is discussed in detail.
The second style employed by negotiators is the principled win-win approach. The two sides compare their overall objectives to find common areas of benefit that can be agreed upon. Often this can be achieved by looking beyond the initial demands to discover the underlying ones.
For instance, do you really want to cut your wages bill or are you actually trying to find a way to increase profitability? Do your workers really want shorter hours or are they looking for more family-friendly and flexible working patterns? The win-win approach is less confrontational but risks being seen as a compromise that may not be the best result for anyone.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/conducting-negotiations-resolve-disputes
Links
The legal consequences of failing to gain statutory immunity
How the law works when the statutory immunities do not apply, making any subsequent industrial action unlawful.
Where statutory immunity for organising industrial action has not been met, eg because a union or individual has failed to organise a proper secret ballot, employers and others (such as their customers and suppliers) who are damaged - or likely to be damaged - by the action may take civil proceedings in the courts against the union or individual.
However, the person wishing to bring civil proceedings must still show that:
- an unlawful, unprotected act has been done or is threatened
- they are party to a contract which will be - or has been - broken or interfered with by the unlawful act
- they are likely to suffer - or have suffered - loss as a result
In addition, an individual deprived of goods or services because of the unlawful organisation of industrial action can also bring proceedings to stop this happening.
However, for this purpose, the individual does not need to show that they are party to a contract, which will be - or has been - broken or interfered with by the unlawful act.
Who can be sued as a result of unlawful industrial action?
Civil proceedings will normally be taken against the trade union or individual organising the industrial action.
However, in the case of picketing, it may be possible to sue the individual pickets as well as those who organised the unlawful picketing. This is because the pickets are inducing interference with the performance of contracts.
Note that even if it's a union that is responsible for organising unlawful industrial action, this does not prevent legal proceedings from being brought against the individual organisers.
Trade union liability for inducing breach of contract
The law states the circumstances in which a trade union is to be held responsible for a relevant act, eg inducing - or threatening to induce - a breach or interference with the performance of a contract.
Where these circumstances apply, a union will be held responsible for a relevant act regardless of any term or condition to the contrary in its own rules, or in any other contractual provision or rule of law.
A union will be liable for any relevant act, which is done, authorised, or endorsed by:
- its executive committee
- its general secretary or president
- any person given power under the union's own rules to do so
- any other committee of the union or any official of the union
For these purposes:
- A 'committee of the union' is any group of persons constituted in accordance with the rules of the union.
- A relevant act will be taken to have been done, authorised, or endorsed by an official if it was done, authorised, or endorsed by a group of persons, or any member of a group, to which an official belonged at the relevant time if the group's purposes include organising or co-ordinating industrial action.
- An 'official' is any person who is an officer of the union or a branch or section of the union or any person who is elected or appointed in accordance with the union's rules to be a representative of its members. This includes any person elected or appointed who is an employee of the same employer as the members, or one or more of the members, they are elected to represent, eg a shop steward.
However, if a relevant act that is done (or authorised or endorsed) by such a committee or official is 'effectively repudiated' by the union's executive committee, general secretary, or president, the union will not be held liable.
In order to avoid liability in this way, the executive committee, president, or general secretary of the union must repudiate the act as soon as reasonably practicable after it has come to the knowledge of any of them, and the union must, without delay:
- give written notice of the repudiation to the committee or official in question
- do its best to give individual written notice of the fact and date of the repudiation to every member of the union who it has reason to believe is taking part - or might otherwise take part - in industrial action as a result of the act and give similar written notice to the employer of every such member
The written notice of repudiation given to the union's members must contain the following statement:
"Your union has repudiated the call (or calls) for industrial action to which this notice relates and will give no support to unofficial industrial action taken in response to it (or them). If you are dismissed while taking unofficial industrial action, you will have no right to complain of unfair dismissal."
However, even if it takes these steps, a union will not be considered to have 'effectively repudiated' an act if:
- the executive committee, president, or general secretary subsequently behaves in a way that is inconsistent with the repudiation
- at any time up to three months after the repudiation, a party to a commercial contract that has been, or maybe, interfered with by the relevant act, requests the union's executive committee, president, or general secretary to confirm that the act has been repudiated, and written confirmation is not then given
Remedies
Where statutory immunity does not apply, those party to contracts which are broken, or the performance of which is interfered with, by the organisation of - or a threat to organise - industrial action, may seek an injunction against the organisers from the courts.
A court may, after examining the circumstances, grant an injunction on an interim basis pending a full hearing of the case. However, the union or individual against whom the order is sought will have the legal right to be given a chance to put their case forward.
If an injunction is not obeyed, those who sought it can go back to court and ask to have those concerned declared in contempt of court.
Anyone found to be in contempt of court may face heavy fines or other penalties which the court may consider appropriate. For example, a union may be deprived of its assets through sequestration. This is where the funds are placed in the control of a person appointed by the court who may, in particular, pay any fines or legal costs arising from the court proceedings.
It is also possible to claim damages for losses suffered - which may, but need not, be preceded by an application for an injunction - if the basis of the proceedings is a claim that an act involved breach, or interference with the performance of contracts.
Note that there are upper limits on the amounts a court can award by way of damages in any proceedings against a trade union. These limits depend on the size of the union concerned.
Limits on awards for damages against a union organising unlawful industrial action
Number of trade union members Upper limit on award for damages Fewer than 5,000 £10,000 5,000 - 24,999 £50,000 25,000 - 99,999 £125,000 100,000 or more £250,000
Other unlawful acts during industrial action
Those who have organised lawful industrial action are only protected from legal action for a relevant act, eg inducing breaches, or interference with the performance of contracts.
As such, there is no immunity for strikers or their organisers who commit other civil wrongs or criminal offences.
For example:
- if strikers or their organisers commit a criminal offence, such as intentional damage to property, they are liable to be arrested and prosecuted by the police in the same way as anyone else who commits such an offence
- if strikers or their organisers commit an unlawful trespass, eg by entering premises without authority or by staging a 'sit-in', they are liable to be sued for that and any other unlawful acts involved just like any other members of the public who occupy premises unlawfully
Also, note that the union has immunity only if the sole ground of liability is a relevant act - such as inducing a breach of contract. If some other non-protected ground of liability exists, immunity will be lost.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/legal-consequences-failing-gain-statutory-immunity
Links
Conducting industrial action ballots
How a union must conduct a ballot before it can call for official industrial action.
If the employer and the union have exhausted all other available means of resolving a dispute, the union may feel that there is no alternative but to call on its members to take industrial action.
However, for the industrial action to be lawful, it must meet certain conditions. One of these is that the union calling for the action must hold a properly conducted secret ballot.
For information on the other conditions, see lawful industrial action.
The law sets out certain requirements that the union must satisfy for the ballot to be legitimate. These requirements are set out below.
1. Independent scrutiny
For a ballot where more than 50 members have the right to vote, the union must appoint a qualified independent person as the scrutineer of the ballot. Information on who qualifies as a scrutineer is available from the Labour Relations Agency (LRA) - contact the LRA.
The total number of members with the right to vote can be an aggregate number of members from one - or more than one - workplace and where this is more than 50, scrutiny procedures must be followed.
A scrutineer must be, to the best belief of the union, independent of the union and able to carry out their duties competently.
The scrutineer's terms of appointment must include producing a report on the conduct of the ballot. They must produce the report as soon as reasonably practicable after the date of the ballot - and not later than four weeks after that date.
The union must provide a copy of the scrutineer's report to any union member who was entitled to vote in the ballot and any employer of such a member who requests one within six months of the date of the ballot.
The copy must be supplied as soon as reasonably practicable and free of charge - or on payment of a reasonable fee specified by the union. The scrutineer's report must say whether or not the ballot has been conducted fairly and lawfully.
See the Department for the Economy's code of practice on industrial action ballots and notice to employers for further information on scrutineers.
2. Sending employers notice of the ballot and a sample voting paper
The union must take such steps as are reasonably necessary to ensure that any employer of any union members who are entitled to vote receives certain information.
The union must send this information not later than the seventh day before the intended opening day of the ballot, ie the first day when a voting paper is sent to any person entitled to vote.
The notice must be in writing and must:
- state that the union intends to hold the ballot
- specify the date which the union reasonably believes will be the opening day of the ballot
- provide a list of the categories of employee to which the employees concerned belong, a list of the workplaces at which the employees concerned work, figures on the number of employees in each category, the number of employees at each workplace, the total number of employees concerned plus an explanation of how these figures were arrived at
Note that the lists and figures mentioned above do not need to be provided in full where the workers concerned pay their union subscriptions by deduction from pay at source, ie through the so-called 'check off' system.
In such circumstances, the notice must contain either:
- those same lists, figures, and explanations as set out above
- information that will allow the employer to easily work out the total number of employees concerned, the categories of employee to which they belong, the number of employees concerned in each of those categories, the workplaces at which the employees concerned work, and the number of them at each of these workplaces
The 'employees concerned' are those whom the union reasonably believes will be entitled to vote in the ballot.
Not later than the third day before the intended opening day of the ballot, the union must send the employer a sample of the voting paper (and any variants of it) which will be sent to the workers concerned.
The paper must:
- state the name of the independent scrutineer, where appropriate
- give the return address, and the date, it is to be returned by
- have a number, which is one of a series of consecutive numbers used to give a different number to each voting paper
- make it clear whether voters are being asked if they are prepared to take part in - or to continue to take part in - industrial action which consists of a strike, or industrial action short of a strike (which includes overtime bans and call-out bans)
- specify the person(s) and/or class(es) of person(s) who the union intends to have authority to make the first call for industrial action relating to the ballot, if the vote is in favour of industrial action
The paper must also contain the following statement: "If you take part in strike or other industrial action, you may be in breach of your contract of employment. However, if you are dismissed for taking part in a strike or other industrial action which is called officially and is otherwise lawful, the dismissal will be unfair if it takes place fewer than twelve weeks after you started taking part in the action, and depending on the circumstances may be unfair if it takes place later."
That statement must not be qualified or commented upon by anything else on the voting paper.
3. Timing of the ballot and related action
If members vote in favour of industrial action, the action must begin within four weeks of the date of the ballot.
However, a union may be allowed to make its first call for industrial action more than four weeks after the date of the ballot if either:
- the employer and union agree on an extension of up to a further four weeks, eg to continue with talks that are making progress
- an injunction granted by a court (or an undertaking given by the union to the court) prohibits the union from calling for industrial action during some part, or the whole, of the four weeks following the date of the ballot, and the injunction subsequently lapses or is set aside, or the union is released from its undertaking
In the latter case, a union may apply for a court order which, if granted, would provide that the period of the prohibition would not count towards the four-week period for which ballots are normally effective.
The union must apply to the court no more than eight weeks after the date of the ballot. In such cases, the ballot cannot be effective if a union's first call for industrial action is made more than 12 weeks after the date of the ballot.
If the court believes that the result of a ballot no longer represents the views of union members, or that something has happened or is likely to happen that would result in union members voting against taking, or continuing with, action if there were a fresh ballot, it may not make such an order.
Note that a union cannot gain statutory immunity merely by holding a properly conducted secret ballot after previously calling for industrial action without one.
4. Entitlement to vote
All those members whom the union - at the time of the ballot - reasonably believes will be induced by the union to take part in or continue with the industrial action, must be given the equal entitlement to vote. No one else may be given a vote - otherwise, the ballot will be invalid.
The union may choose whether or not to give a vote to 'overseas members', ie members other than merchant seamen and offshore workers who are outside Northern Ireland at the time of the ballot.
However, members who are in Great Britain throughout the voting period for an industrial action ballot and who will be called upon to take part in, or continue with the industrial action must be given entitlement to vote in the ballot if either:
- their place of work is in Northern Ireland and the ballot is of members at their place of work
- the industrial action to which the ballot relates will involve members in Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland and the ballot is a general one covering workplaces in both Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Members required to be given entitlement to vote by either of these requirements do not count as 'overseas members' for the purposes of the law on industrial action balloting.
The ballot will also be invalid if anyone denied entitlement to vote is subsequently called on to take part in the action by the union with the exception of union members who either:
- were not members at the time of the ballot
- were members at the time of the ballot but who it was not reasonable for the union to expect to be called upon to take action, eg because they changed jobs after the ballot
Where the members of a union with different workplaces are to be balloted, a separate ballot will be necessary for each workplace unless one of the conditions set out below is met. It will be unlawful for the union to organise industrial action at any such workplace where a majority of those voting in the ballot for that workplace have not voted 'Yes' in response to the relevant required question(s). If a worker works at or from a single set of premises, their workplace is those premises. If not, it is the premises with which their employment has the closest connection.
In summary, the conditions for holding a single ballot for more than one workplace are that:
- at each of the workplaces covered by the single ballot there is at least one member of the union affected by the dispute
- entitlement to vote in the single ballot is given and limited to all of a union's members who, according to the union's reasonable belief, are employed in a particular occupation or occupations by one employer or any of a number of employers with whom the union is in dispute
- entitlement to vote in the single ballot is given and limited to all of a union's members who are employed by a particular employer or any of a number of employers with whom the union is in dispute
It is possible for a union to hold more than one ballot on a dispute at a single workplace. If the conditions above are met, some or all of those ballots may also cover members in other workplaces.
5. Voting procedures
Voting must be made by the marking of a voting paper. The union should have sent the employer a sample of this at least three days before the start of the voting.
Those voting must be allowed to do so without interference from or constraint imposed by the union or any of its members, officials, or workers.
So far as is reasonably practicable, every member properly entitled to vote must be:
- able to vote in secret
- given a convenient opportunity to vote by post at no direct cost to themselves
- sent a voting paper by post to their home address or any other address which they have asked the union, in writing, to treat as their postal address
There is a limited exception to these rules for the balloting of union members who are merchant seamen and the union reasonably believes that they will be employed in a ship at sea (or outside Northern Ireland) at some time during the voting period and that it will be convenient for them to vote while on the ship or where the ship is.
The voting paper must ask whether or not the voter is prepared to take part in - or continue to take part in - either:
- a strike
- action short of a strike, eg, an overtime or call-out ban
While the question(s) may be framed in different ways, the voter must be able to answer either 'Yes' or 'No' to indicate whether they are willing to take part in - or continue with - the industrial action.
The voting paper must specify the person(s) or description of the person(s) who the union intends to have authority to call for industrial action to which the ballot relates if the vote is in favour of industrial action.
For this purpose, anyone so specified need not be authorised under the union's rules to call on members to take industrial action but must be among those for whose acts the union is responsible in law.
6. Majority support
Majority support must be obtained in response to the question(s) on the voting paper that is appropriate to the type of industrial action concerned, ie:
- in the case of a strike, majority support must be obtained in response to a question on the voting paper which asks if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) strike action
- in the case of action short of a strike, majority support must be obtained in response to a question on the voting paper which asks if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) action short of a strike
- if the action consists or may consist of a strike and other industrial action, majority support must be obtained for each type of action in response to separate questions on the voting paper asking if members are prepared to take part in (or continue with) each type
Majority support means the majority of those who actually vote, not the majority of those entitled to vote.
7. Announcing ballot results
A union must, as soon as reasonably practicable after holding an industrial action ballot, take steps to inform all those entitled to vote, and their employer(s), of the number of:
- votes cast in the ballot
- spoiled voting papers
- individuals answering 'No' to the required question(s)
- individuals answering 'Yes' to the required question(s)
Where separate workplace ballots are required, these details must be notified separately to those entitled to vote at each workplace.
If overseas members of a trade union have been given entitlement to vote in an industrial action ballot, the detailed information about its result need not be sent to them. However, the information supplied to non-overseas members in accordance with the statutory requirements must give separate details relating to overseas and non-overseas members. For these purposes, members in Great Britain given entitlement to vote do not count as overseas members.
8. Consequences of a union's failure to meet balloting requirements
If a union fails to satisfy the statutory requirements relating to the ballot or to give employers notice of industrial action (apart from certain small accidental failures that are unlikely to affect the result), this failure will give grounds for proceedings against a union by:
- a customer
- an employer
- a supplier of an employer
- an individual member of the public claiming that an effect or likely effect of the industrial action would be to prevent or delay the supply of goods or services to them or to reduce the quality of goods or services supplied
With the exception of failures to comply with the requirements to give notice to employers, such failures will also give grounds for action by the union's members.
If a union fails only to provide the required notice of intent to ballot or the sample voting paper to a particular employer who should have received it, only that employer or any individual deprived of goods or services because of the industrial action can bring proceedings.
Failure to satisfy any other balloting requirements will expose the union to proceedings brought by others, eg by its own members.
9. Calls for industrial action from individuals unspecified on the voting paper
A ballot will not give a union statutory immunity from legal proceedings if industrial action is called by a person not specified or described on the voting paper.
Therefore, if someone calls for action other than a specified person and no call is made by a specified person, the union would be at risk of proceedings being brought against it unless it effectively repudiated the call.
10. Statutory code of practice on industrial action notices and ballots
The Department for the Economy's statutory code of practice for industrial ballots and notice to employers promotes good practice in the conduct of industrial action ballots arranged by a trade union and in the preparation of notices to employers.
Failure to observe the provisions of the code does not in itself render a union, or anyone else, liable to any legal proceedings. However, where proceedings are brought against a union, the provisions of the code are admissible in evidence and may be taken into account by a court if they appear relevant to any question before it.
Developed withAlso on this siteContent category
Source URL
/content/conducting-industrial-action-ballots
Links